Study on the Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty of Ultrasonic Evaporation Sensor

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
MAPAN Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1007/s12647-024-00796-5
Mingming Wei, Yan Qi, Jun Meng, Taocheng Zhou
{"title":"Study on the Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty of Ultrasonic Evaporation Sensor","authors":"Mingming Wei,&nbsp;Yan Qi,&nbsp;Jun Meng,&nbsp;Taocheng Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s12647-024-00796-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In order to effectively improve the accuracy of measurement data from the ultrasonic evaporation sensor (UES), research is conducted on evaluating the measurement uncertainty of the UES.The UES calibration results for the AG2.0 model are used as an example and are looked at using the Monte Carlo method (MCM), the adaptive Monte Carlo method (AMCM), and the guide to the expression uncertainty in measurement (GUM). This is done to see how well the different evaluation methods work in this area. Firstly, the basic principles of MCM, AMCM, and GUM are introduced, respectively. Then, the UES's working principle and calibration process are looked at. A measurement model that fits is made, and the 60 mm calibration point is used to get calibration results. Finally, MCM, AMCM, and GUM are used to carry out measurement uncertainty on the calibration results, respectively. The results show that those evaluated by MCM and AMCM are basically similar; however, AMCM requires much fewer simulations than MCM (only 3% of those required by MCM). The GUM's applicability has not been verified. Therefore, in uncertainty evaluation in this field, both AMMC and MCM have similar effects, but AMCM's ability to save program running resources and improve evaluation efficiency is significantly better than that offered by MCM. It is recommended to use AMCM, as GUM is no longer applicable for evaluating measurement uncertainty in this field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":689,"journal":{"name":"MAPAN","volume":"40 1","pages":"139 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MAPAN","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12647-024-00796-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to effectively improve the accuracy of measurement data from the ultrasonic evaporation sensor (UES), research is conducted on evaluating the measurement uncertainty of the UES.The UES calibration results for the AG2.0 model are used as an example and are looked at using the Monte Carlo method (MCM), the adaptive Monte Carlo method (AMCM), and the guide to the expression uncertainty in measurement (GUM). This is done to see how well the different evaluation methods work in this area. Firstly, the basic principles of MCM, AMCM, and GUM are introduced, respectively. Then, the UES's working principle and calibration process are looked at. A measurement model that fits is made, and the 60 mm calibration point is used to get calibration results. Finally, MCM, AMCM, and GUM are used to carry out measurement uncertainty on the calibration results, respectively. The results show that those evaluated by MCM and AMCM are basically similar; however, AMCM requires much fewer simulations than MCM (only 3% of those required by MCM). The GUM's applicability has not been verified. Therefore, in uncertainty evaluation in this field, both AMMC and MCM have similar effects, but AMCM's ability to save program running resources and improve evaluation efficiency is significantly better than that offered by MCM. It is recommended to use AMCM, as GUM is no longer applicable for evaluating measurement uncertainty in this field.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MAPAN
MAPAN 工程技术-物理:应用
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: MAPAN-Journal Metrology Society of India is a quarterly publication. It is exclusively devoted to Metrology (Scientific, Industrial or Legal). It has been fulfilling an important need of Metrologists and particularly of quality practitioners by publishing exclusive articles on scientific, industrial and legal metrology. The journal publishes research communication or technical articles of current interest in measurement science; original work, tutorial or survey papers in any metrology related area; reviews and analytical studies in metrology; case studies on reliability, uncertainty in measurements; and reports and results of intercomparison and proficiency testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信