Riccardo Testa, Antonino Galati, Giorgio Schifani, Giuseppina Migliore
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of conventional and precision agriculture sprayers in Southern Italian vineyards: A break-even point analysis","authors":"Riccardo Testa, Antonino Galati, Giorgio Schifani, Giuseppina Migliore","doi":"10.1007/s11119-025-10233-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Through targeted spray applications, precision agriculture can provide not only environmental benefits but also lower production costs, improving farm competitiveness. Nevertheless, few studies have focused on the cost-effectiveness of precision agriculture sprayers in vineyards, which are among the most widespread specialty crops. Therefore, this is the first study that aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of variable rate technology (VRT) and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayers compared to a conventional sprayer in a hypothetical and representative vineyard area of southern Italy. The economic analysis, based on technological parameters in the literature, enabled the identification of the minimum farm size (break-even point) for introducing precision agriculture sprayers (PAS), considering the annual cost of the pesticide treatments (equipment and pesticide costs). Our findings revealed that the UAV sprayer—if permitted by law—could be the most convenient option for farms larger than 2.27 ha, whereas the VRT sprayer should be chosen by farms over 17.02 ha. However, public subsidies, such as those provided by the Italian Recovery Plan, make adopting VRT sprayers also economically viable for areas as small as 3.03 ha. Finally, the sensitivity analysis confirmed that the purchase price and pesticide cost are the most sensitive parameters affecting the break-even points. Our findings shed light on the economic sustainability of these innovative sprayers, a key driver for their adoption by farmers and for setting future strategies for facing the current agricultural crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":20423,"journal":{"name":"Precision Agriculture","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-025-10233-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Through targeted spray applications, precision agriculture can provide not only environmental benefits but also lower production costs, improving farm competitiveness. Nevertheless, few studies have focused on the cost-effectiveness of precision agriculture sprayers in vineyards, which are among the most widespread specialty crops. Therefore, this is the first study that aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of variable rate technology (VRT) and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayers compared to a conventional sprayer in a hypothetical and representative vineyard area of southern Italy. The economic analysis, based on technological parameters in the literature, enabled the identification of the minimum farm size (break-even point) for introducing precision agriculture sprayers (PAS), considering the annual cost of the pesticide treatments (equipment and pesticide costs). Our findings revealed that the UAV sprayer—if permitted by law—could be the most convenient option for farms larger than 2.27 ha, whereas the VRT sprayer should be chosen by farms over 17.02 ha. However, public subsidies, such as those provided by the Italian Recovery Plan, make adopting VRT sprayers also economically viable for areas as small as 3.03 ha. Finally, the sensitivity analysis confirmed that the purchase price and pesticide cost are the most sensitive parameters affecting the break-even points. Our findings shed light on the economic sustainability of these innovative sprayers, a key driver for their adoption by farmers and for setting future strategies for facing the current agricultural crisis.
期刊介绍:
Precision Agriculture promotes the most innovative results coming from the research in the field of precision agriculture. It provides an effective forum for disseminating original and fundamental research and experience in the rapidly advancing area of precision farming.
There are many topics in the field of precision agriculture; therefore, the topics that are addressed include, but are not limited to:
Natural Resources Variability: Soil and landscape variability, digital elevation models, soil mapping, geostatistics, geographic information systems, microclimate, weather forecasting, remote sensing, management units, scale, etc.
Managing Variability: Sampling techniques, site-specific nutrient and crop protection chemical recommendation, crop quality, tillage, seed density, seed variety, yield mapping, remote sensing, record keeping systems, data interpretation and use, crops (corn, wheat, sugar beets, potatoes, peanut, cotton, vegetables, etc.), management scale, etc.
Engineering Technology: Computers, positioning systems, DGPS, machinery, tillage, planting, nutrient and crop protection implements, manure, irrigation, fertigation, yield monitor and mapping, soil physical and chemical characteristic sensors, weed/pest mapping, etc.
Profitability: MEY, net returns, BMPs, optimum recommendations, crop quality, technology cost, sustainability, social impacts, marketing, cooperatives, farm scale, crop type, etc.
Environment: Nutrient, crop protection chemicals, sediments, leaching, runoff, practices, field, watershed, on/off farm, artificial drainage, ground water, surface water, etc.
Technology Transfer: Skill needs, education, training, outreach, methods, surveys, agri-business, producers, distance education, Internet, simulations models, decision support systems, expert systems, on-farm experimentation, partnerships, quality of rural life, etc.