Breastfeeding Support Provided by Lactation Consultants

IF 24.7 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Curtis J. D’Hollander, Victoria A. McCredie, Elizabeth M. Uleryk, Michaela Kucab, Rosella M. Le, Ofri Hayosh, Charles D. G. Keown-Stoneman, Catherine S. Birken, Jonathon L. Maguire
{"title":"Breastfeeding Support Provided by Lactation Consultants","authors":"Curtis J. D’Hollander, Victoria A. McCredie, Elizabeth M. Uleryk, Michaela Kucab, Rosella M. Le, Ofri Hayosh, Charles D. G. Keown-Stoneman, Catherine S. Birken, Jonathon L. Maguire","doi":"10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.6810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceBreast milk offers numerous health benefits, yet breastfeeding recommendations are met less than half of the time in high-income countries.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of lactation consultant (LC) interventions on breastfeeding, maternal breastfeeding self-efficacy, and infant growth compared to usual care.Data SourcesThe Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and the gray literature were searched for articles published between January 1985 and July 2024. The search took place on July 10, 2024, and data analysis was performed from July to August 2024.Study SelectionRandomized clinical trials of LC interventions in high-income countries published in any language were eligible for inclusion.Data Extraction and SynthesisData extracted included study design, participant and intervention characteristics, and outcome data. To account for studies that reported outcomes at multiple time points, effect estimates were pooled with 3-level correlated and hierarchical effects models. Meta-regression was performed for clinically important characteristics, such as the time point when the outcome was measured, intervention intensity, and participant income.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was stopping exclusive breastfeeding. Secondary outcomes included stopping any breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding and any breastfeeding duration, maternal breastfeeding self-efficacy, infant overweight and obesity, and infant growth.ResultsThe search yielded 6476 records, of which 40 studies were included involving 8582 participants. Studies were published between 1992 and 2024, and most studies (n = 22) were conducted in the US. Compared to usual care, LC interventions reduced the risk of stopping exclusive breastfeeding (risk ratio [RR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99) and any breastfeeding (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87-0.96) and increased any breastfeeding duration by 3.63 weeks (95% CI, 0.13-7.12). There was weak evidence that LC interventions increased exclusive breastfeeding duration (mean difference [MD], 1.44 weeks; 95% CI, −2.73 to 5.60), maternal breastfeeding self-efficacy (MD, 2.83; 95% CI, −1.23 to 6.90), or the risk of infant overweight and obesity (RR, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.94-2.46). Meta-regression showed that LC interventions were more effective at reducing the risk for stopping exclusive breastfeeding (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .01) and any breastfeeding (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001) the earlier that breastfeeding was measured in the postpartum period. LC interventions with a higher intensity (ie, number of LC visits) were more effective at reducing the risk for stopping any breastfeeding (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .04).Conclusions and RelevanceAccording to the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis, LC interventions are a promising intervention for improving exclusive breastfeeding and any breastfeeding in high-income countries.","PeriodicalId":14683,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Pediatrics","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":24.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.6810","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ImportanceBreast milk offers numerous health benefits, yet breastfeeding recommendations are met less than half of the time in high-income countries.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of lactation consultant (LC) interventions on breastfeeding, maternal breastfeeding self-efficacy, and infant growth compared to usual care.Data SourcesThe Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and the gray literature were searched for articles published between January 1985 and July 2024. The search took place on July 10, 2024, and data analysis was performed from July to August 2024.Study SelectionRandomized clinical trials of LC interventions in high-income countries published in any language were eligible for inclusion.Data Extraction and SynthesisData extracted included study design, participant and intervention characteristics, and outcome data. To account for studies that reported outcomes at multiple time points, effect estimates were pooled with 3-level correlated and hierarchical effects models. Meta-regression was performed for clinically important characteristics, such as the time point when the outcome was measured, intervention intensity, and participant income.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was stopping exclusive breastfeeding. Secondary outcomes included stopping any breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding and any breastfeeding duration, maternal breastfeeding self-efficacy, infant overweight and obesity, and infant growth.ResultsThe search yielded 6476 records, of which 40 studies were included involving 8582 participants. Studies were published between 1992 and 2024, and most studies (n = 22) were conducted in the US. Compared to usual care, LC interventions reduced the risk of stopping exclusive breastfeeding (risk ratio [RR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99) and any breastfeeding (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87-0.96) and increased any breastfeeding duration by 3.63 weeks (95% CI, 0.13-7.12). There was weak evidence that LC interventions increased exclusive breastfeeding duration (mean difference [MD], 1.44 weeks; 95% CI, −2.73 to 5.60), maternal breastfeeding self-efficacy (MD, 2.83; 95% CI, −1.23 to 6.90), or the risk of infant overweight and obesity (RR, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.94-2.46). Meta-regression showed that LC interventions were more effective at reducing the risk for stopping exclusive breastfeeding (P = .01) and any breastfeeding (P &amp;lt; .001) the earlier that breastfeeding was measured in the postpartum period. LC interventions with a higher intensity (ie, number of LC visits) were more effective at reducing the risk for stopping any breastfeeding (P = .04).Conclusions and RelevanceAccording to the results of this systematic review and meta-analysis, LC interventions are a promising intervention for improving exclusive breastfeeding and any breastfeeding in high-income countries.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Pediatrics
JAMA Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
31.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
357
期刊介绍: JAMA Pediatrics, the oldest continuously published pediatric journal in the US since 1911, is an international peer-reviewed publication and a part of the JAMA Network. Published weekly online and in 12 issues annually, it garners over 8.4 million article views and downloads yearly. All research articles become freely accessible online after 12 months without any author fees, and through the WHO's HINARI program, the online version is accessible to institutions in developing countries. With a focus on advancing the health of infants, children, and adolescents, JAMA Pediatrics serves as a platform for discussing crucial issues and policies in child and adolescent health care. Leveraging the latest technology, it ensures timely access to information for its readers worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信