Strengths for Helping Professionals Exposed to Secondary Trauma: A Scoping Review.

IF 5.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Kate Whittenbury, Shelby L Clark, Matthew Brooks, Tessa Murphy, Martin J Turner, Hannah Fawcett
{"title":"Strengths for Helping Professionals Exposed to Secondary Trauma: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Kate Whittenbury, Shelby L Clark, Matthew Brooks, Tessa Murphy, Martin J Turner, Hannah Fawcett","doi":"10.1177/15248380241309371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Helping professionals working with people who have experienced trauma are at risk of developing psychological distress. To date, most studies exploring psychological distress among helping professionals have focused on risk factors associated with the development of adverse reactions to secondary trauma, and few have identified strengths or protective factors, which may buffer and/or alleviate distress. Therefore, this scoping review uses the Resilience Portfolio Model (Grych et al., 2015) to synthesize literature on individual and environmental strengths, which may mitigate adverse reactions to secondary trauma in helping professionals. Utilizing the CINAHL, PsycArticles, PsycInfo, and MEDLINE databases, 43 articles published between 1990 and May 2023 from over 20 countries were identified. The findings suggest that professionals draw upon a portfolio of meaning-making, regulatory, interpersonal, and ecological strengths to increase their protective resources. Most studies identified were quantitative, and usually explored organizational factors, such as supervision. Further empirical investigations could help identify individual strengths that could be targeted within interventions to protect professionals against the impact of secondary traumatic stress. Additionally, more research is needed to investigate the interconnectedness of individual, organizational, and systemic factors that buffer helping professionals from the deleterious effects of trauma work.</p>","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":"26 2","pages":"251-264"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241309371","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Helping professionals working with people who have experienced trauma are at risk of developing psychological distress. To date, most studies exploring psychological distress among helping professionals have focused on risk factors associated with the development of adverse reactions to secondary trauma, and few have identified strengths or protective factors, which may buffer and/or alleviate distress. Therefore, this scoping review uses the Resilience Portfolio Model (Grych et al., 2015) to synthesize literature on individual and environmental strengths, which may mitigate adverse reactions to secondary trauma in helping professionals. Utilizing the CINAHL, PsycArticles, PsycInfo, and MEDLINE databases, 43 articles published between 1990 and May 2023 from over 20 countries were identified. The findings suggest that professionals draw upon a portfolio of meaning-making, regulatory, interpersonal, and ecological strengths to increase their protective resources. Most studies identified were quantitative, and usually explored organizational factors, such as supervision. Further empirical investigations could help identify individual strengths that could be targeted within interventions to protect professionals against the impact of secondary traumatic stress. Additionally, more research is needed to investigate the interconnectedness of individual, organizational, and systemic factors that buffer helping professionals from the deleterious effects of trauma work.

帮助暴露于继发性创伤的专业人员的优势:范围审查。
帮助那些与经历过创伤的人一起工作的专业人士有产生心理困扰的风险。到目前为止,大多数关于帮助专业人员心理困扰的研究都集中在与继发性创伤不良反应发展相关的风险因素上,很少有研究确定可以缓冲和/或减轻痛苦的优势或保护因素。因此,本综述使用弹性组合模型(Grych et al., 2015)来综合有关个人和环境优势的文献,这可能会减轻帮助专业人员对继发性创伤的不良反应。利用CINAHL、PsycArticles、PsycInfo和MEDLINE数据库,对1990年至2023年5月期间来自20多个国家发表的43篇文章进行了鉴定。研究结果表明,专业人员利用意义创造、监管、人际关系和生态优势的组合来增加他们的保护资源。大多数研究都是定量的,通常探讨组织因素,如监督。进一步的实证调查可以帮助确定个体优势,这些优势可以在干预措施中成为目标,以保护专业人员免受继发性创伤压力的影响。此外,需要更多的研究来调查个人、组织和系统因素之间的相互联系,这些因素可以缓冲帮助专业人员免受创伤工作的有害影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is devoted to organizing, synthesizing, and expanding knowledge on all force of trauma, abuse, and violence. This peer-reviewed journal is practitioner oriented and will publish only reviews of research, conceptual or theoretical articles, and law review articles. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is dedicated to professionals and advanced students in clinical training who work with any form of trauma, abuse, and violence. It is intended to compile knowledge that clearly affects practice, policy, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信