Collective Violence, Strengths, and Perceived Posttraumatic Growth: A Scoping Review.

IF 5.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Matthew Brooks, Rachel Olivia O'Brien, Maria Livanou, Martin J Turner, Kate Whittenbury
{"title":"Collective Violence, Strengths, and Perceived Posttraumatic Growth: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Matthew Brooks, Rachel Olivia O'Brien, Maria Livanou, Martin J Turner, Kate Whittenbury","doi":"10.1177/15248380241309383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Collective violence-such as armed conflict, state-sponsored violence, and terrorism-represents a profound form of trauma, which can harm individuals, communities, and societies. Existing research has largely examined risk factors and negative psychosocial outcomes from collective violence, neglecting the potential for survivors to draw upon a range of strengths that may allow them to perceive benefits from their experiences, known as posttraumatic growth (PTG). This scoping review uses the resilience portfolio model to highlight a potential portfolio of meaning-making, regulatory, and interpersonal-ecological strength-based resources and assets that are conducive to perceived PTG (PPTG) and possible better functioning following collective violence. The present review identified 52 papers from CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycArticles, and PsychInfo, spanning from January 1995 to May 2023, which specifically focused on strengths and PTG in populations who reside (or had resided) in over 20 countries. This review highlights individual- and group-level meaning making, regulatory, and interpersonal strengths used by survivors in both individualistic and collectivist societies, providing a more comprehensive understanding of resilience and PPTG after collective violence. Some strengths, such as religious coping, positive reappraisal, and social support, demonstrated mixed relations with PPTG. The research also identified previously uncategorized ecological/systemic supports for PPTG such as political climate, access to education, and sanitation infrastructure, which require more research. The findings call for culturally sensitive approaches that recognize and promote individual and community efforts to enhance well-being among populations disproportionately affected by collective violence.</p>","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":"26 2","pages":"342-355"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11872054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241309383","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collective violence-such as armed conflict, state-sponsored violence, and terrorism-represents a profound form of trauma, which can harm individuals, communities, and societies. Existing research has largely examined risk factors and negative psychosocial outcomes from collective violence, neglecting the potential for survivors to draw upon a range of strengths that may allow them to perceive benefits from their experiences, known as posttraumatic growth (PTG). This scoping review uses the resilience portfolio model to highlight a potential portfolio of meaning-making, regulatory, and interpersonal-ecological strength-based resources and assets that are conducive to perceived PTG (PPTG) and possible better functioning following collective violence. The present review identified 52 papers from CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycArticles, and PsychInfo, spanning from January 1995 to May 2023, which specifically focused on strengths and PTG in populations who reside (or had resided) in over 20 countries. This review highlights individual- and group-level meaning making, regulatory, and interpersonal strengths used by survivors in both individualistic and collectivist societies, providing a more comprehensive understanding of resilience and PPTG after collective violence. Some strengths, such as religious coping, positive reappraisal, and social support, demonstrated mixed relations with PPTG. The research also identified previously uncategorized ecological/systemic supports for PPTG such as political climate, access to education, and sanitation infrastructure, which require more research. The findings call for culturally sensitive approaches that recognize and promote individual and community efforts to enhance well-being among populations disproportionately affected by collective violence.

集体暴力--如武装冲突、国家支持的暴力和恐怖主义--是一种深刻的创伤形式,会对个人、社区和社会造成伤害。现有研究在很大程度上研究了集体暴力的风险因素和负面社会心理后果,却忽视了幸存者利用一系列力量的潜力,这些力量可能使他们从自己的经历中获益,即所谓的创伤后成长(PTG)。本范围界定综述使用复原力组合模型来强调潜在的意义建构、调节和人际生态力量型资源和资产组合,这些资源和资产有利于感知创伤后成长(PPTG),并可能在集体暴力后更好地发挥作用。本综述从 CINAHL、MEDLINE、PsycArticles 和 PsychInfo 中找到了 52 篇论文,时间跨度从 1995 年 1 月到 2023 年 5 月,这些论文特别关注居住在(或曾经居住在)20 多个国家的人群的力量和 PTG。本综述强调了幸存者在个人主义和集体主义社会中使用的个人和群体层面的意义建构、调节和人际交往优势,从而更全面地了解集体暴力后的复原力和PPTG。一些力量,如宗教应对、积极再评价和社会支持,与 PPTG 的关系不一。研究还发现了以前未被归类的对 PPTG 的生态/系统支持,如政治气候、受教育机会和卫生基础设施,这些都需要更多的研究。研究结果呼吁采取对文化敏感的方法,承认并促进个人和社区的努力,以提高受集体暴力影响尤为严重的人群的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is devoted to organizing, synthesizing, and expanding knowledge on all force of trauma, abuse, and violence. This peer-reviewed journal is practitioner oriented and will publish only reviews of research, conceptual or theoretical articles, and law review articles. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is dedicated to professionals and advanced students in clinical training who work with any form of trauma, abuse, and violence. It is intended to compile knowledge that clearly affects practice, policy, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信