Anatomical validation of the sonographic detection of small nervous structures.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Shalimar Abdullah, Muhammad Shafiq Azhar, Sabarul Afian Mokhtar, Lim Chia Hua, Elaine Soh Zi Fan, Juliana Fairuz Maktar, Suraya Aziz, Emilia Rosniza Mohammed Rusli, Aina Shamira Noor Hisham, Vaikunthan Rajaratnam
{"title":"Anatomical validation of the sonographic detection of small nervous structures.","authors":"Shalimar Abdullah, Muhammad Shafiq Azhar, Sabarul Afian Mokhtar, Lim Chia Hua, Elaine Soh Zi Fan, Juliana Fairuz Maktar, Suraya Aziz, Emilia Rosniza Mohammed Rusli, Aina Shamira Noor Hisham, Vaikunthan Rajaratnam","doi":"10.1007/s00276-025-03596-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ultrasound is a primary imaging modality for diagnosing and managing nerve-related injuries, particularly for identifying peripheral nerve locations. However, its accuracy and reliability in surgical applications remain insufficiently explored, potentially limiting its utility in nerve surgery.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to assess the precision of ultrasound in identifying upper limb peripheral nerves by comparing ultrasonographic findings with direct human cadaveric dissection.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Fourteen fresh-frozen upper limb specimens were examined in February 2023. Ultrasound assessments were performed by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists using three linear probes (15 MHz, 24 MHz, and a 22 MHz hockey stick probe). Seven peripheral nerves were identified and marked using dye injections. Subsequent dissections were conducted under loupe magnification by hand surgeons.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The recurrent motor branch of the median nerve exhibited the lowest discrepancy (mean 1.014 ± 1.459 mm) and the highest accuracy (64.29% of specimens). The greatest discrepancy was observed in the branch of the musculocutaneous nerve to the brachialis (mean 5.114 ± 3.758 mm). The interrater correlation coefficient (ICC) varied across nerve sites, ranging from - 6.298 to 0.795, with the highest ICC observed in the superficial branch of the ulnar nerve (0.795, 0.066).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that ultrasound is a valid and effective tool for identifying peripheral nerve branches in the upper limb, particularly for superficial nerves. Improved accuracy in ultrasound-guided nerve identification may enhance surgical precision and reduce complications in nerve-related procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":49461,"journal":{"name":"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy","volume":"47 1","pages":"85"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-025-03596-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasound is a primary imaging modality for diagnosing and managing nerve-related injuries, particularly for identifying peripheral nerve locations. However, its accuracy and reliability in surgical applications remain insufficiently explored, potentially limiting its utility in nerve surgery.

Purpose: This study aims to assess the precision of ultrasound in identifying upper limb peripheral nerves by comparing ultrasonographic findings with direct human cadaveric dissection.

Method: Fourteen fresh-frozen upper limb specimens were examined in February 2023. Ultrasound assessments were performed by two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists using three linear probes (15 MHz, 24 MHz, and a 22 MHz hockey stick probe). Seven peripheral nerves were identified and marked using dye injections. Subsequent dissections were conducted under loupe magnification by hand surgeons.

Result: The recurrent motor branch of the median nerve exhibited the lowest discrepancy (mean 1.014 ± 1.459 mm) and the highest accuracy (64.29% of specimens). The greatest discrepancy was observed in the branch of the musculocutaneous nerve to the brachialis (mean 5.114 ± 3.758 mm). The interrater correlation coefficient (ICC) varied across nerve sites, ranging from - 6.298 to 0.795, with the highest ICC observed in the superficial branch of the ulnar nerve (0.795, 0.066).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that ultrasound is a valid and effective tool for identifying peripheral nerve branches in the upper limb, particularly for superficial nerves. Improved accuracy in ultrasound-guided nerve identification may enhance surgical precision and reduce complications in nerve-related procedures.

小神经结构超声检测的解剖学验证。
简介:超声是诊断和治疗神经相关损伤的主要成像方式,特别是用于识别周围神经的位置。然而,它在外科应用中的准确性和可靠性仍然没有得到充分的探索,这可能限制了它在神经外科手术中的应用。目的:通过与直接解剖人体尸体的超声表现进行比较,评价超声识别上肢周围神经的准确性。方法:于2023年2月对14例新鲜冷冻上肢标本进行检查。超声评估由两名经验丰富的肌肉骨骼放射科医生使用三个线性探头(15 MHz, 24 MHz和22 MHz曲棍球棒探头)进行。用染料注射识别和标记7个周围神经。随后由手外科医生在放大镜下进行解剖。结果:正中神经运动复发支误差最小(平均1.014±1.459 mm),准确率最高(64.29%)。肌皮神经至肱肌的分支差异最大(平均5.114±3.758 mm)。各神经部位间相关系数(ICC)变化范围为- 6.298 ~ 0.795,其中尺神经浅支间相关系数最高(0.795、0.066)。结论:超声是识别上肢周围神经分支,特别是浅表神经分支的有效工具。超声引导下神经识别准确性的提高可以提高手术精度,减少神经相关手术的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Anatomy is a morphological science which cannot fail to interest the clinician. The practical application of anatomical research to clinical problems necessitates special adaptation and selectivity in choosing from numerous international works. Although there is a tendency to believe that meaningful advances in anatomy are unlikely, constant revision is necessary. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, the first international journal of Clinical anatomy has been created in this spirit. Its goal is to serve clinicians, regardless of speciality-physicians, surgeons, radiologists or other specialists-as an indispensable aid with which they can improve their knowledge of anatomy. Each issue includes: Original papers, review articles, articles on the anatomical bases of medical, surgical and radiological techniques, articles of normal radiologic anatomy, brief reviews of anatomical publications of clinical interest. Particular attention is given to high quality illustrations, which are indispensable for a better understanding of anatomical problems. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy is a journal written by anatomists for clinicians with a special interest in anatomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信