Effects of reinforcement sensitivity, impulsivity, and working memory on shoot/don't shoot performance in law enforcement officers and civilians under normal and high cognitive load.
Robert R Horn, Skylar Paletta, Gustavo Sandri Heidner, William J Lewinski, Lon Bartel, Daniel Gwon, Nicholas P Murray
{"title":"Effects of reinforcement sensitivity, impulsivity, and working memory on shoot/don't shoot performance in law enforcement officers and civilians under normal and high cognitive load.","authors":"Robert R Horn, Skylar Paletta, Gustavo Sandri Heidner, William J Lewinski, Lon Bartel, Daniel Gwon, Nicholas P Murray","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2025.2466013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We compared shoot/don't shoot task (SDST) performance in law enforcement officers (LEOs) and non-officers under normal cognitive load, and under higher load induced by processing a complex dispatch message. We also examined the effects of participants' behavioural activation (BAS) and inhibition (BIS) systems, impulsivity, and working memory on SDST performance. Stimuli were videos of shoot and don't shoot variations performed by three actors. Dependent measures were shoot errors, fail-to-shoot errors, response time, and shooting accuracy. Compared to non-officers, LEOs were more accurate and adapted to make fewer fail-to-shoot errors. They were not faster, and did not make fewer shoot errors. Compared to normal cognitive load, under higher load, participants were quicker and more accurate, but made more shoot errors. The higher cognitive load condition revealed effects that were not present under normal load. Participants making more shoot errors had higher BAS, and BIS than those making fewer or no errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2466013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We compared shoot/don't shoot task (SDST) performance in law enforcement officers (LEOs) and non-officers under normal cognitive load, and under higher load induced by processing a complex dispatch message. We also examined the effects of participants' behavioural activation (BAS) and inhibition (BIS) systems, impulsivity, and working memory on SDST performance. Stimuli were videos of shoot and don't shoot variations performed by three actors. Dependent measures were shoot errors, fail-to-shoot errors, response time, and shooting accuracy. Compared to non-officers, LEOs were more accurate and adapted to make fewer fail-to-shoot errors. They were not faster, and did not make fewer shoot errors. Compared to normal cognitive load, under higher load, participants were quicker and more accurate, but made more shoot errors. The higher cognitive load condition revealed effects that were not present under normal load. Participants making more shoot errors had higher BAS, and BIS than those making fewer or no errors.
期刊介绍:
Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives.
The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people.
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.