Role and perception of healthcare professionals in referring cancer patients to online cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Louise Zanni, Jonathan Journiac, Josée Savard, Estelle Guerdoux, Guilhem Paillard-Brunet, Léonor Fasse, Jean-Bernard Le Provost, Cécile Charles, Sarah Dauchy, Diane Boinon
{"title":"Role and perception of healthcare professionals in referring cancer patients to online cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia.","authors":"Louise Zanni, Jonathan Journiac, Josée Savard, Estelle Guerdoux, Guilhem Paillard-Brunet, Léonor Fasse, Jean-Bernard Le Provost, Cécile Charles, Sarah Dauchy, Diane Boinon","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09284-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Insomnia represents a major issue in oncology, which can be successfully treated by online Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia, such as the Insomnet program. However, promoting its successful implementation in routine care requires healthcare providers' involvement. This study aimed to explore healthcare professionals' perceptions of this online program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was a part of the French Sleep-4-All-2.0 multicentric study. It explored, through two focus groups including 19 healthcare professionals of three cancer centers, their perceptions regarding their role in patient referral, and the perceived barriers and facilitators in accessing this type of intervention. The content of the focus groups was subjected to a descriptive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four major themes were identified: (1) ambivalent representations of online tools (including patients convinced by remote intervention, evolution of representations in relation to the health context, adapted to sleep disorders, professionals' preconceptions of online tools), (2) barriers to implementation (including few perceived barriers, forgetting patients' particularities, professionals' lack of knowledge, a possible threat to the patient-caregiver relationship, financial cost), (3) levers for implementation (including real benefits for patients, professionals who feel confident, preserved patient-caregiver relationship, institutional innovations to remedy dysfunctions), and (4) professional involvement in implementation (what they need, what to avoid, what they already do, what they see themselves doing).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Online (healthcare) services were reported to help increase access to healthcare, but that should not replace the relationship between patients and healthcare professionals. All professionals must be informed and trained to refer patients to these programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 3","pages":"239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09284-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Insomnia represents a major issue in oncology, which can be successfully treated by online Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia, such as the Insomnet program. However, promoting its successful implementation in routine care requires healthcare providers' involvement. This study aimed to explore healthcare professionals' perceptions of this online program.

Methods: This qualitative study was a part of the French Sleep-4-All-2.0 multicentric study. It explored, through two focus groups including 19 healthcare professionals of three cancer centers, their perceptions regarding their role in patient referral, and the perceived barriers and facilitators in accessing this type of intervention. The content of the focus groups was subjected to a descriptive thematic analysis.

Results: Four major themes were identified: (1) ambivalent representations of online tools (including patients convinced by remote intervention, evolution of representations in relation to the health context, adapted to sleep disorders, professionals' preconceptions of online tools), (2) barriers to implementation (including few perceived barriers, forgetting patients' particularities, professionals' lack of knowledge, a possible threat to the patient-caregiver relationship, financial cost), (3) levers for implementation (including real benefits for patients, professionals who feel confident, preserved patient-caregiver relationship, institutional innovations to remedy dysfunctions), and (4) professional involvement in implementation (what they need, what to avoid, what they already do, what they see themselves doing).

Conclusion: Online (healthcare) services were reported to help increase access to healthcare, but that should not replace the relationship between patients and healthcare professionals. All professionals must be informed and trained to refer patients to these programs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信