Higher relevance of mechanical determinants for short-distance performance and metabolic determinants for middle-distance performance in female adolescent swimmers at national level.
{"title":"Higher relevance of mechanical determinants for short-distance performance and metabolic determinants for middle-distance performance in female adolescent swimmers at national level.","authors":"Sebastian Keller, Patrick Wahl","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-92056-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study investigated associations of metabolic, anthropometric, and neuromuscular parameters with 50 to 400 m front crawl performance. Competition performances of 24 female swimmers (14.9 ± 1.3 years) were recorded and metabolic determinants (maximal oxygen uptake and lactate accumulation [ċLa<sub>max</sub>], cost of swimming [C], and lactate threshold 1 [LT1] using 200 m all-out, 20 s sprint, 500 m submaximal, and 3 min incremental test, respectively), anthropometry and dryland strength (squat and bench press 1 repetition maximum [1RM<sub>SQ</sub>/1RM<sub>BP</sub>] and mean propulsive power [MPP<sub>SQ</sub>/MPP<sub>BP</sub>]) were assessed. 1RM<sub>SQ</sub> (61.9 ± 13.3 kg) and MPP<sub>BP</sub> (207 ± 45 W) correlated significantly with 50 (1.84 ± 0.07 m∙s<sup>-1</sup>) and 100 m performance (1.68 ± 0.06 m∙s<sup>-1</sup>) (r ≥ 0.45) and ċLamax (0.35 ± 0.12 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>·s<sup>-1</sup>) and body mass (60.1 ± 7.0 kg) with 50 and 100 m, respectively (r ≥ 0.44). Only LT1 (1.23 ± 0.04 m∙s<sup>-1</sup>) correlated significantly with 200 (1.52 ± 0.05 m∙s<sup>-1</sup>) and 400 m performance (1.43 ± 0.06 m∙s<sup>-1</sup>) (r ≥ 0.56). Multiple regression explained 33-35% and 61-86% of the variance in short- and middle-distance performance based on 1RM<sub>SQ</sub> and arm span and LT1, C, and fat percentage, respectively. Based on the analyses, mechanical determinants are more predictive of short- and metabolic determinants of middle-distance performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"7132"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92056-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The study investigated associations of metabolic, anthropometric, and neuromuscular parameters with 50 to 400 m front crawl performance. Competition performances of 24 female swimmers (14.9 ± 1.3 years) were recorded and metabolic determinants (maximal oxygen uptake and lactate accumulation [ċLamax], cost of swimming [C], and lactate threshold 1 [LT1] using 200 m all-out, 20 s sprint, 500 m submaximal, and 3 min incremental test, respectively), anthropometry and dryland strength (squat and bench press 1 repetition maximum [1RMSQ/1RMBP] and mean propulsive power [MPPSQ/MPPBP]) were assessed. 1RMSQ (61.9 ± 13.3 kg) and MPPBP (207 ± 45 W) correlated significantly with 50 (1.84 ± 0.07 m∙s-1) and 100 m performance (1.68 ± 0.06 m∙s-1) (r ≥ 0.45) and ċLamax (0.35 ± 0.12 mmol·L-1·s-1) and body mass (60.1 ± 7.0 kg) with 50 and 100 m, respectively (r ≥ 0.44). Only LT1 (1.23 ± 0.04 m∙s-1) correlated significantly with 200 (1.52 ± 0.05 m∙s-1) and 400 m performance (1.43 ± 0.06 m∙s-1) (r ≥ 0.56). Multiple regression explained 33-35% and 61-86% of the variance in short- and middle-distance performance based on 1RMSQ and arm span and LT1, C, and fat percentage, respectively. Based on the analyses, mechanical determinants are more predictive of short- and metabolic determinants of middle-distance performance.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.