Sublingual sufentanil after orthopaedic and abdominal surgery: long-term outcome and safety.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Michael Borck, Jan D Wandrey, Claudia Spies, Sascha Tafelski
{"title":"Sublingual sufentanil after orthopaedic and abdominal surgery: long-term outcome and safety.","authors":"Michael Borck, Jan D Wandrey, Claudia Spies, Sascha Tafelski","doi":"10.1186/s13741-025-00506-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute postoperative pain management often requires opioid treatment with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Non-invasive PCA with a sublingual sufentanil tablet system (SSTS) may reduce acute pain sufficiently, but opioids are associated with central nerve system side effects and risk of long-term opioid use postoperatively. The objective of this study was to observe the SSTS to assess the incidence of postoperative chronic pain (PCP) and postoperative delirium (POD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a longitudinal cohort study based at a university hospital between November 2017 and November 2021. Adults undergoing elective orthopaedic knee or abdominal surgery planned for PCA as postoperative pain management were included. They received the SSTS in addition to a standardised pain medication protocol depending on the surgery they underwent. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, emergency surgery, concurrent participation in another clinical trial and chronic opioid use before surgery. Patients were followed after surgery in hospital and over 3 and 12 months for pain, cognitive function and side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether N = 80 patients were included with SSTS postoperatively. Daily pain experience decreased from pre-operatively 89.2% of patients to 45.7% and 22.5% at 3 and 12 months. None of our patients developed postoperative delirium after surgery. Patients reported high overall satisfaction with SSTS (median 8.0/10 points, IQR 3). However, 51% of patients had difficulties with handling the SSTS and required acute replacement of the authentication tag.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SSTS sufficiently treated acute postoperative pain without incidence of POD and demonstrated good tolerability and overall ease. Postoperative pain improved significantly over time but 22% still reported chronic pain related to surgery. Technical issues with the identification thumb tag limited the feasibility of SSTS.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This prospective longitudinal cohort study was approved by the ethics committee of the Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Ethics committee 2, Campus Charité Virchow Klinikum, EA2/041/17, Prof. Dr. jur. R. Seeland, 21.03.2017) and was registered in the study register ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03133858 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11869576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-025-00506-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute postoperative pain management often requires opioid treatment with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Non-invasive PCA with a sublingual sufentanil tablet system (SSTS) may reduce acute pain sufficiently, but opioids are associated with central nerve system side effects and risk of long-term opioid use postoperatively. The objective of this study was to observe the SSTS to assess the incidence of postoperative chronic pain (PCP) and postoperative delirium (POD).

Methods: This was a longitudinal cohort study based at a university hospital between November 2017 and November 2021. Adults undergoing elective orthopaedic knee or abdominal surgery planned for PCA as postoperative pain management were included. They received the SSTS in addition to a standardised pain medication protocol depending on the surgery they underwent. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, emergency surgery, concurrent participation in another clinical trial and chronic opioid use before surgery. Patients were followed after surgery in hospital and over 3 and 12 months for pain, cognitive function and side effects.

Results: Altogether N = 80 patients were included with SSTS postoperatively. Daily pain experience decreased from pre-operatively 89.2% of patients to 45.7% and 22.5% at 3 and 12 months. None of our patients developed postoperative delirium after surgery. Patients reported high overall satisfaction with SSTS (median 8.0/10 points, IQR 3). However, 51% of patients had difficulties with handling the SSTS and required acute replacement of the authentication tag.

Conclusions: SSTS sufficiently treated acute postoperative pain without incidence of POD and demonstrated good tolerability and overall ease. Postoperative pain improved significantly over time but 22% still reported chronic pain related to surgery. Technical issues with the identification thumb tag limited the feasibility of SSTS.

Trial registration: This prospective longitudinal cohort study was approved by the ethics committee of the Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Ethics committee 2, Campus Charité Virchow Klinikum, EA2/041/17, Prof. Dr. jur. R. Seeland, 21.03.2017) and was registered in the study register ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03133858 ).

骨科和腹部手术后舌下含服舒芬太尼:长期疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信