{"title":"Efficacy and safety of rituximab in anti-MuSK myasthenia Gravis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Siripong Chayanopparat, Perasin Banyatcharoen, Jiraporn Jitprapaikulsan, Ekdanai Uawithya, Natnasak Apiraksattayakul, Vasinee Viarasilpa","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-90937-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness and safety of rituximab in patients with myasthenia gravis harboring antibodies to muscle-specific kinase (anti-MuSK). Four databases were searched from inception to December 23, 2023. We included adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) who were diagnosed with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis and who received rituximab. The outcomes assessed were the proportions of patients who achieved minimal manifestations or better and those who achieved complete stable remission or pharmacologic remission, according to the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Postintervention Status (MGFA-PIS) scale at the last follow-up. Additional outcomes were mean glucocorticoid dose reduction and severe adverse events. Twelve studies with 111 participants were included. Overall, 82% (95% CI, 71‒91%; I<sup>2</sup> = 30.12%, P = 0.15) of patients achieved MGFA-PIS minimal manifestations or better, and 56% (95% CI, 45‒67%; I<sup>2</sup> = 0.00%, P = 0.60) achieved MGFA-PIS complete stable remission or pharmacologic remission. The mean reduction in the glucocorticoid dose was 17.15 mg (95% CI, 11.77‒22.53; I<sup>2</sup> = 32.40%, P = 0.19). Only one patient developed osteomyelitis during rituximab treatment. This study demonstrated that rituximab is a safe and effective treatment for anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis, helping patients achieve minimal manifestations, complete stable remission, or pharmacologic remission with minimal serious adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"7219"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90937-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness and safety of rituximab in patients with myasthenia gravis harboring antibodies to muscle-specific kinase (anti-MuSK). Four databases were searched from inception to December 23, 2023. We included adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) who were diagnosed with anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis and who received rituximab. The outcomes assessed were the proportions of patients who achieved minimal manifestations or better and those who achieved complete stable remission or pharmacologic remission, according to the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Postintervention Status (MGFA-PIS) scale at the last follow-up. Additional outcomes were mean glucocorticoid dose reduction and severe adverse events. Twelve studies with 111 participants were included. Overall, 82% (95% CI, 71‒91%; I2 = 30.12%, P = 0.15) of patients achieved MGFA-PIS minimal manifestations or better, and 56% (95% CI, 45‒67%; I2 = 0.00%, P = 0.60) achieved MGFA-PIS complete stable remission or pharmacologic remission. The mean reduction in the glucocorticoid dose was 17.15 mg (95% CI, 11.77‒22.53; I2 = 32.40%, P = 0.19). Only one patient developed osteomyelitis during rituximab treatment. This study demonstrated that rituximab is a safe and effective treatment for anti-MuSK myasthenia gravis, helping patients achieve minimal manifestations, complete stable remission, or pharmacologic remission with minimal serious adverse events.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.