Cyril A Etaka, Daniel L Weller, Alexis M Hamilton, Faith Critzer, Laura K Strawn
{"title":"Sanitation Interventions for Reducing Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella on Canvas and Cordura® Harvest Bags.","authors":"Cyril A Etaka, Daniel L Weller, Alexis M Hamilton, Faith Critzer, Laura K Strawn","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Food contact surfaces, including harvest bags, are potential vectors for cross-contamination in produce operations, yet recommendations for their sanitation are limited. This study evaluated the efficacy of wet- and dry-based sanitizers in reducing Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella on two harvest bag materials, canvas, and Cordura®. Coupons (25cm<sup>2</sup>) were inoculated with 5-strain cocktails of L. monocytogenes or Salmonella (∼7 log CFU/coupon) before treatment. Treatments included chlorine (200 ppm; pH 7), peroxyacetic acid (PAA; 200 ppm), isopropyl alcohol with quaternary ammonium compounds (IPAQuats; ready-to-use), steam, and water. Sanitizers were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions for a 1-minute contact time. After treatment, pathogen concentrations were enumerated on selective (Modified Oxford, Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate) and non-selective (Tryptic Soy Agar) media. Duplicate experiments were conducted with five replicates per treatment (n=10) and pathogen reductions were evaluated using log-linear mixed-effects models. IPAQuats observed the highest reductions with L. monocytogenes reductions of 5.16±0.93 log CFU/coupon and 6.01±0.49 log CFU/coupon, and Salmonella reductions of 4.61 ± 1.03 log CFU/coupon and 5.90 ± 0.57 log CFU/coupon on canvas and Cordura®, respectively. PAA resulted in L. monocytogenes reductions of 2.63±0.56 and 3.92±0.81 log CFU/coupon and Salmonella reductions of 3.68±0.79 and 3.21±1.14 log CFU/coupon on canvas and Cordura®, respectively. Chlorine and steam were less effective with reductions of <3 log CFU/coupon for both pathogens and materials. While no difference in L. monocytogenes reduction was observed between materials by treatment, Salmonella reductions on Cordura® were significantly higher than reductions on canvas after treatments with IPAQuats (1.62 log CFU/coupon; 95% CI=1.19, 2.05) and steam (0.84 log CFU/coupon; 95% CI=0.42, 1.28). Results provide recommendations for produce growers on effective sanitation of harvest bags.</p>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":" ","pages":"100472"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Food contact surfaces, including harvest bags, are potential vectors for cross-contamination in produce operations, yet recommendations for their sanitation are limited. This study evaluated the efficacy of wet- and dry-based sanitizers in reducing Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella on two harvest bag materials, canvas, and Cordura®. Coupons (25cm2) were inoculated with 5-strain cocktails of L. monocytogenes or Salmonella (∼7 log CFU/coupon) before treatment. Treatments included chlorine (200 ppm; pH 7), peroxyacetic acid (PAA; 200 ppm), isopropyl alcohol with quaternary ammonium compounds (IPAQuats; ready-to-use), steam, and water. Sanitizers were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions for a 1-minute contact time. After treatment, pathogen concentrations were enumerated on selective (Modified Oxford, Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate) and non-selective (Tryptic Soy Agar) media. Duplicate experiments were conducted with five replicates per treatment (n=10) and pathogen reductions were evaluated using log-linear mixed-effects models. IPAQuats observed the highest reductions with L. monocytogenes reductions of 5.16±0.93 log CFU/coupon and 6.01±0.49 log CFU/coupon, and Salmonella reductions of 4.61 ± 1.03 log CFU/coupon and 5.90 ± 0.57 log CFU/coupon on canvas and Cordura®, respectively. PAA resulted in L. monocytogenes reductions of 2.63±0.56 and 3.92±0.81 log CFU/coupon and Salmonella reductions of 3.68±0.79 and 3.21±1.14 log CFU/coupon on canvas and Cordura®, respectively. Chlorine and steam were less effective with reductions of <3 log CFU/coupon for both pathogens and materials. While no difference in L. monocytogenes reduction was observed between materials by treatment, Salmonella reductions on Cordura® were significantly higher than reductions on canvas after treatments with IPAQuats (1.62 log CFU/coupon; 95% CI=1.19, 2.05) and steam (0.84 log CFU/coupon; 95% CI=0.42, 1.28). Results provide recommendations for produce growers on effective sanitation of harvest bags.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.