Assessing diagnostic accuracy of congenital syphilis using penicillin administration data through the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
International Journal of STD & AIDS Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1177/09564624251324981
John M Flores, Natalie Grills, Jason M Kane, Lilly Cheng Immergluck, Nikki Kasal, Madan Kumar, Allison Bartlett
{"title":"Assessing diagnostic accuracy of congenital syphilis using penicillin administration data through the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database.","authors":"John M Flores, Natalie Grills, Jason M Kane, Lilly Cheng Immergluck, Nikki Kasal, Madan Kumar, Allison Bartlett","doi":"10.1177/09564624251324981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundGiven the most recent report of the nationwide rise of congenital syphilis (CS), with over a 773% increase from 2012 to 2021 per the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, we sought to utilize penicillin administration and ICD-10 billing data as proxies to assess the accuracy of diagnosis of congenital syphilis among major tertiary care pediatric hospitals.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study drawing data from 49 major tertiary children's hospitals in the United States sought to determine whether administration of penicillin in infants 30 days or younger, excluding other common infectious diseases treated with the medication, correlated with recently reported congenital syphilis epidemiologic data.Results2290 infants met inclusion criteria and received penicillin therapy, excluding infants with the most common secondary infections treated with penicillin, with 1123 (49.3%) of those included not having a syphilis diagnosis made. Of the neonates with a coded diagnosis of CS, (1107/1162) 95.3% received more than 1 day of penicillin therapy, and those not coded for CS that received more than 1 day of penicillin therapy was 37.9% (428/1128).ConclusionsOur findings found a significant number of infants who had penicillin administration and laboratory and procedural workup performed suggestive of congenital syphilis consideration, without a congenital syphilis diagnosis billed. This may reflect an underestimation of what is notably a growing nationwide pandemic. By addressing the screening and treatment needs of patients with CS, we can help to address some of the socioeconomic inequities in pediatric and maternal healthcare, and further accurately characterize the extent of this increasingly prevalent disease process.</p>","PeriodicalId":14408,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","volume":" ","pages":"475-486"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624251324981","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundGiven the most recent report of the nationwide rise of congenital syphilis (CS), with over a 773% increase from 2012 to 2021 per the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, we sought to utilize penicillin administration and ICD-10 billing data as proxies to assess the accuracy of diagnosis of congenital syphilis among major tertiary care pediatric hospitals.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study drawing data from 49 major tertiary children's hospitals in the United States sought to determine whether administration of penicillin in infants 30 days or younger, excluding other common infectious diseases treated with the medication, correlated with recently reported congenital syphilis epidemiologic data.Results2290 infants met inclusion criteria and received penicillin therapy, excluding infants with the most common secondary infections treated with penicillin, with 1123 (49.3%) of those included not having a syphilis diagnosis made. Of the neonates with a coded diagnosis of CS, (1107/1162) 95.3% received more than 1 day of penicillin therapy, and those not coded for CS that received more than 1 day of penicillin therapy was 37.9% (428/1128).ConclusionsOur findings found a significant number of infants who had penicillin administration and laboratory and procedural workup performed suggestive of congenital syphilis consideration, without a congenital syphilis diagnosis billed. This may reflect an underestimation of what is notably a growing nationwide pandemic. By addressing the screening and treatment needs of patients with CS, we can help to address some of the socioeconomic inequities in pediatric and maternal healthcare, and further accurately characterize the extent of this increasingly prevalent disease process.

通过儿童卫生信息系统(PHIS)数据库使用青霉素给药数据评估先天性梅毒的诊断准确性。
背景:根据疾病控制和预防中心的最新报告,从2012年到2021年,先天性梅毒(CS)在全国范围内上升了773%以上,我们试图利用青霉素给药和ICD-10计费数据作为代理,评估主要三级保健儿科医院先天性梅毒诊断的准确性。方法:本回顾性队列研究收集了来自美国49家主要三级儿童医院的数据,旨在确定30天或以下的婴儿(不包括其他常见传染病)使用青霉素是否与最近报道的先天性梅毒流行病学数据相关。结果:2290名婴儿符合纳入标准并接受了青霉素治疗,排除了用青霉素治疗的最常见继发性感染的婴儿,其中1123名(49.3%)未被诊断为梅毒。编码诊断为CS的新生儿中,(1107/1162)95.3%接受了1天以上的青霉素治疗,未编码为CS的新生儿接受了1天以上的青霉素治疗的占37.9%(428/1128)。结论:我们的研究结果发现,相当多的婴儿接受了青霉素治疗,并进行了实验室和程序检查,提示有先天性梅毒的考虑,而没有先天性梅毒的诊断。这可能反映了对一场明显日益严重的全国性流行病的低估。通过解决CS患者的筛查和治疗需求,我们可以帮助解决儿科和孕产妇保健中的一些社会经济不平等问题,并进一步准确地描述这种日益流行的疾病进程的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of STD & AIDS provides a clinically oriented forum for investigating and treating sexually transmissible infections, HIV and AIDS. Publishing original research and practical papers, the journal contains in-depth review articles, short papers, case reports, audit reports, CPD papers and a lively correspondence column. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信