Effectiveness, safety and efficiency of next-day discharge versus a 3-day hospital stay after primary total hip arthroplasty.

Q3 Medicine
Juan Carlos Ferragut Bria, Francisco Antonio Miralles Muñoz, Fernando Sendra Miralles, Enrique Ruiz Piñana, Blanca González Navarro, María Flores Vizcaya Moreno
{"title":"Effectiveness, safety and efficiency of next-day discharge versus a 3-day hospital stay after primary total hip arthroplasty.","authors":"Juan Carlos Ferragut Bria, Francisco Antonio Miralles Muñoz, Fernando Sendra Miralles, Enrique Ruiz Piñana, Blanca González Navarro, María Flores Vizcaya Moreno","doi":"10.1016/j.recot.2025.02.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some studies have proposed reducing unnecessary hospitalization days after total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery to just a single overnight stay with discharge the morning after surgery. However, the available evidence on patient safety is of poor quality. The main objective was to analyze patient safety after discharge from the hospital the morning after THA surgery (rapid discharge), comparing it with the standard 3-day postoperative stay.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective, non-randomized comparative study was designed to compare two consecutive cohorts over time. The first cohort included patients with a postoperative stay of 3 days, while the second cohort had discharge the morning after surgery. The study evaluated the rate of complications and adverse events both postoperatively and after hospital discharge, as well as pain control using the visual analog scale, functional outcome using the Harris hip scale, patient satisfaction, and economic cost.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rates of unexpected visits to the emergency room, early complications, readmissions, and reinterventions were similar in both groups, with no significant differences. The functional outcome was also similar in both groups, but the rapid discharge group experienced earlier recovery and significant financial savings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rapid discharge, the morning after surgery, is a safe, effective and efficient procedure for primary THA in the majority of patients, with respect to a 3-day stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":39664,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2025.02.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Some studies have proposed reducing unnecessary hospitalization days after total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery to just a single overnight stay with discharge the morning after surgery. However, the available evidence on patient safety is of poor quality. The main objective was to analyze patient safety after discharge from the hospital the morning after THA surgery (rapid discharge), comparing it with the standard 3-day postoperative stay.

Material and methods: A prospective, non-randomized comparative study was designed to compare two consecutive cohorts over time. The first cohort included patients with a postoperative stay of 3 days, while the second cohort had discharge the morning after surgery. The study evaluated the rate of complications and adverse events both postoperatively and after hospital discharge, as well as pain control using the visual analog scale, functional outcome using the Harris hip scale, patient satisfaction, and economic cost.

Results: The rates of unexpected visits to the emergency room, early complications, readmissions, and reinterventions were similar in both groups, with no significant differences. The functional outcome was also similar in both groups, but the rapid discharge group experienced earlier recovery and significant financial savings.

Conclusion: Rapid discharge, the morning after surgery, is a safe, effective and efficient procedure for primary THA in the majority of patients, with respect to a 3-day stay.

初次全髋关节置换术后第二天出院与3天住院的有效性、安全性和效率。
背景:一些研究建议减少全髋关节置换术(THA)术后不必要的住院天数,仅住院一晚,术后早晨出院。然而,现有的关于患者安全的证据质量很差。主要目的是分析THA术后早晨(快速出院)患者出院后的安全性,并将其与标准的术后3天住院时间进行比较。材料和方法:设计了一项前瞻性、非随机对照研究,比较两个连续的队列。第一组患者术后住院3天,第二组患者术后早上出院。该研究评估了术后和出院后并发症和不良事件的发生率,以及使用视觉模拟量表的疼痛控制,使用Harris髋关节量表的功能结局,患者满意度和经济成本。结果:两组患者的急诊室意外就诊率、早期并发症、再入院率和再干预率相似,无显著差异。两组的功能结果也相似,但快速出院组恢复得更早,节省了大量资金。结论:对于大多数患者来说,术后早晨快速出院是一种安全、有效和高效的方法,住院时间为3天。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
审稿时长
51 weeks
期刊介绍: Es una magnífica revista para acceder a los mejores artículos de investigación en la especialidad y los casos clínicos de mayor interés. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad, y está incluida en prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信