Effectiveness, safety and efficiency of next-day discharge versus a 3-day hospital stay after primary total hip arthroplasty.

Q3 Medicine
Juan Carlos Ferragut Bria, Francisco Antonio Miralles Muñoz, Fernando Sendra Miralles, Enrique Ruiz Piñana, Blanca González Navarro, María Flores Vizcaya Moreno
{"title":"Effectiveness, safety and efficiency of next-day discharge versus a 3-day hospital stay after primary total hip arthroplasty.","authors":"Juan Carlos Ferragut Bria, Francisco Antonio Miralles Muñoz, Fernando Sendra Miralles, Enrique Ruiz Piñana, Blanca González Navarro, María Flores Vizcaya Moreno","doi":"10.1016/j.recot.2025.02.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some studies have proposed reducing unnecessary hospitalization days after total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery to just a single overnight stay with discharge the morning after surgery. However, the available evidence on patient safety is of poor quality. The main objective was to analyze patient safety after discharge from the hospital the morning after THA surgery (rapid discharge), comparing it with the standard 3-day postoperative stay.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective, non-randomized comparative study was designed to compare two consecutive cohorts over time. The first cohort included patients with a postoperative stay of 3 days, while the second cohort had discharge the morning after surgery. The study evaluated the rate of complications and adverse events both postoperatively and after hospital discharge, as well as pain control using the visual analog scale, functional outcome using the Harris hip scale, patient satisfaction, and economic cost.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rates of unexpected visits to the emergency room, early complications, readmissions, and reinterventions were similar in both groups, with no significant differences. The functional outcome was also similar in both groups, but the rapid discharge group experienced earlier recovery and significant financial savings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rapid discharge, the morning after surgery, is a safe, effective and efficient procedure for primary THA in the majority of patients, with respect to a 3-day stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":39664,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2025.02.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Some studies have proposed reducing unnecessary hospitalization days after total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery to just a single overnight stay with discharge the morning after surgery. However, the available evidence on patient safety is of poor quality. The main objective was to analyze patient safety after discharge from the hospital the morning after THA surgery (rapid discharge), comparing it with the standard 3-day postoperative stay.

Material and methods: A prospective, non-randomized comparative study was designed to compare two consecutive cohorts over time. The first cohort included patients with a postoperative stay of 3 days, while the second cohort had discharge the morning after surgery. The study evaluated the rate of complications and adverse events both postoperatively and after hospital discharge, as well as pain control using the visual analog scale, functional outcome using the Harris hip scale, patient satisfaction, and economic cost.

Results: The rates of unexpected visits to the emergency room, early complications, readmissions, and reinterventions were similar in both groups, with no significant differences. The functional outcome was also similar in both groups, but the rapid discharge group experienced earlier recovery and significant financial savings.

Conclusion: Rapid discharge, the morning after surgery, is a safe, effective and efficient procedure for primary THA in the majority of patients, with respect to a 3-day stay.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
审稿时长
51 weeks
期刊介绍: Es una magnífica revista para acceder a los mejores artículos de investigación en la especialidad y los casos clínicos de mayor interés. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad, y está incluida en prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信