Trimming the fat: Identifying 15 underlying concepts from 26 in the social skills domain

IF 6.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Roxanne L. Ross, Allison A. Toth, Eric D. Heggestad, George C. Banks
{"title":"Trimming the fat: Identifying 15 underlying concepts from 26 in the social skills domain","authors":"Roxanne L. Ross,&nbsp;Allison A. Toth,&nbsp;Eric D. Heggestad,&nbsp;George C. Banks","doi":"10.1002/job.2846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A large number of concepts have been proposed to describe social skills and explain social goal attainment. In this work, we identified dozens of such concepts, which have been studied for many decades across a wide variety of social science disciplines. It has been suggested that the social skills literature lacks parsimony and conceptual clarity. We take stock of these challenges and describe their origins. We identify three conceptual limitations that impede progress studying social skills and social goal attainment: redundancy (i.e., jangle fallacy), conflation (i.e., haphazard mixing of different conceptual types), and drift (i.e., jingle fallacy). We used best practices for concept revision and development, assisted by the use of machine learning, to undertake domain-level conceptual clarification, analyzing 756 definitions across six decades of research. This process led us to propose 15 core social skills-related concepts (a 42% reduction). These concepts were located within the social skills framework to begin to depict how they might relate to one another during the pursuit of social goals. This paper contributes to theory by decluttering, organizing, and simplifying the messy and redundant social skills literature and, by doing so, improves theoretical clarity. We close by suggesting areas for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":"46 3","pages":"466-485"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/job.2846","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.2846","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A large number of concepts have been proposed to describe social skills and explain social goal attainment. In this work, we identified dozens of such concepts, which have been studied for many decades across a wide variety of social science disciplines. It has been suggested that the social skills literature lacks parsimony and conceptual clarity. We take stock of these challenges and describe their origins. We identify three conceptual limitations that impede progress studying social skills and social goal attainment: redundancy (i.e., jangle fallacy), conflation (i.e., haphazard mixing of different conceptual types), and drift (i.e., jingle fallacy). We used best practices for concept revision and development, assisted by the use of machine learning, to undertake domain-level conceptual clarification, analyzing 756 definitions across six decades of research. This process led us to propose 15 core social skills-related concepts (a 42% reduction). These concepts were located within the social skills framework to begin to depict how they might relate to one another during the pursuit of social goals. This paper contributes to theory by decluttering, organizing, and simplifying the messy and redundant social skills literature and, by doing so, improves theoretical clarity. We close by suggesting areas for future research.

Abstract Image

人们提出了大量概念来描述社会技能和解释社会目标的实现。在这项工作中,我们确定了数十个这样的概念,这些概念已经在广泛的社会科学学科中研究了数十年。有人认为,社会技能文献缺乏解析性和概念清晰度。我们对这些挑战进行了总结,并描述了它们的起源。我们指出了阻碍社会技能和社会目标实现研究取得进展的三个概念局限性:冗余(即谬误)、混淆(即不同概念类型的随意混合)和漂移(即谬误)。我们利用概念修订和发展的最佳实践,并在机器学习的辅助下,进行了领域级的概念澄清,分析了六十年研究中的 756 个定义。通过这一过程,我们提出了 15 个与社交技能相关的核心概念(减少了 42%)。这些概念被定位在社会技能框架内,开始描绘它们在追求社会目标的过程中如何相互关联。本文对杂乱冗余的社会技能文献进行了整理、组织和简化,从而提高了理论的清晰度。最后,我们对未来的研究领域提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: The Journal of Organizational Behavior aims to publish empirical reports and theoretical reviews of research in the field of organizational behavior, wherever in the world that work is conducted. The journal will focus on research and theory in all topics associated with organizational behavior within and across individual, group and organizational levels of analysis, including: -At the individual level: personality, perception, beliefs, attitudes, values, motivation, career behavior, stress, emotions, judgment, and commitment. -At the group level: size, composition, structure, leadership, power, group affect, and politics. -At the organizational level: structure, change, goal-setting, creativity, and human resource management policies and practices. -Across levels: decision-making, performance, job satisfaction, turnover and absenteeism, diversity, careers and career development, equal opportunities, work-life balance, identification, organizational culture and climate, inter-organizational processes, and multi-national and cross-national issues. -Research methodologies in studies of organizational behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信