A systematic review of isotretinoin and its contraindications in peanut, soybean and cashew nut allergies

Naayema Hussaini, Nabihah Hussaini, Jousef Bakir, Rabeea Mirza, Rubina Fatima
{"title":"A systematic review of isotretinoin and its contraindications in peanut, soybean and cashew nut allergies","authors":"Naayema Hussaini,&nbsp;Nabihah Hussaini,&nbsp;Jousef Bakir,&nbsp;Rabeea Mirza,&nbsp;Rubina Fatima","doi":"10.1002/jvc2.536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Should oral isotretinoin be considered contraindicated in patients with peanut, soybean, and cashew allergies? A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library up to July 2023 was conducted to identify randomised control trials (RCTs), cohort studies, case reports, and cross-sectional studies investigating if isotretinoin should be contraindicated in patients with various allergies including peanut, soybean, and cashew allergies. Primary outcomes explored included relapse, adverse effects, and safety profiles of oral isotretinoin at varying doses. Secondary outcomes included efficacy as well as economic considerations. The quality of studies, including risk of bias, was assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations). A total of eight studies were included. The majority of studies suggested that isotretinoin should not be considered inadvisable. In cases with peanut allergies, minimal adverse effects were noted with various dosages of isotretinoin and prolonged treatment duration. In cases with soybean allergies, similar results and conclusions were obtained to the cases with peanut allergies, however the number of studies were not of similar value to those of peanut allergies. Comparison between studies was challenging due to differing methods of assessment, subjective interpretation of severity and duration of follow-up. This review highlights the need for an adequately powered RCT, to decipher whether isotretinoin should not be given to patients with peanut, soybean or cashew allergies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94325,"journal":{"name":"JEADV clinical practice","volume":"4 1","pages":"42-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jvc2.536","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEADV clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jvc2.536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Should oral isotretinoin be considered contraindicated in patients with peanut, soybean, and cashew allergies? A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library up to July 2023 was conducted to identify randomised control trials (RCTs), cohort studies, case reports, and cross-sectional studies investigating if isotretinoin should be contraindicated in patients with various allergies including peanut, soybean, and cashew allergies. Primary outcomes explored included relapse, adverse effects, and safety profiles of oral isotretinoin at varying doses. Secondary outcomes included efficacy as well as economic considerations. The quality of studies, including risk of bias, was assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations). A total of eight studies were included. The majority of studies suggested that isotretinoin should not be considered inadvisable. In cases with peanut allergies, minimal adverse effects were noted with various dosages of isotretinoin and prolonged treatment duration. In cases with soybean allergies, similar results and conclusions were obtained to the cases with peanut allergies, however the number of studies were not of similar value to those of peanut allergies. Comparison between studies was challenging due to differing methods of assessment, subjective interpretation of severity and duration of follow-up. This review highlights the need for an adequately powered RCT, to decipher whether isotretinoin should not be given to patients with peanut, soybean or cashew allergies.

Abstract Image

花生、大豆和腰果过敏患者是否应禁用口服异维A酸?我们对 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆截至 2023 年 7 月的文献进行了系统性检索,以确定随机对照试验 (RCT)、队列研究、病例报告和横断面研究,调查异维A酸是否应作为花生、大豆和腰果等各种过敏症患者的禁忌症。探讨的主要结果包括复发、不良反应以及不同剂量口服异维A酸的安全性。次要结果包括疗效和经济因素。研究质量(包括偏倚风险)采用 GRADE(建议、评估、发展和评价分级)进行评估。共纳入八项研究。大多数研究表明,不应认为异维A酸不可取。在对花生过敏的病例中,使用不同剂量的异维A酸和延长治疗时间后,不良反应极小。在对大豆过敏的病例中,获得的结果和结论与对花生过敏的病例相似,但研究的数量与对花生过敏的研究价值不相上下。由于评估方法、对严重程度的主观解释和随访时间的长短不同,对不同研究进行比较具有挑战性。本综述强调,需要进行充分有效的 RCT 研究,以确定花生、大豆或腰果过敏患者是否不应服用异维A酸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信