Considering Cumulative Damage in URM Buildings for Clustered Seismicity Risk Assessment

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Pablo Garcia de Quevedo Inarritu, Mohsen Kohrangi, Serena Cattari, Sergio Lagomarsino, Paolo Bazzurro
{"title":"Considering Cumulative Damage in URM Buildings for Clustered Seismicity Risk Assessment","authors":"Pablo Garcia de Quevedo Inarritu,&nbsp;Mohsen Kohrangi,&nbsp;Serena Cattari,&nbsp;Sergio Lagomarsino,&nbsp;Paolo Bazzurro","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings are highly susceptible to cumulative damage, as demonstrated by the damage observations collected during and after numerous earthquake sequences. However, most previous numerical studies assessing cumulative damage in URM buildings have failed to fully capture the extent of the phenomenon observed in real events. This article aims to address this gap by applying a newly developed methodology for modeling the accumulation of damage in URM buildings in risk assessment case studies. This methodology quantifies the cumulative damage using an energy- and displacement-based damage index (DI) within a component-based framework. The methodology is validated using data from the URM school building in Visso that sustained severe, progressive damage during the 2016 Central Italy earthquake sequence. Additionally, this DI is employed to develop hazard-consistent, damage-state-dependent fragility curves for five case-study URM buildings through consecutive nonlinear dynamic analyses. The fragility analysis results align with real-world observations, indicating a significant reduction in structural capacity due to cumulative damage. These set of fragility curves are then utilized in a risk assessment exercise. The last part of this study compares the impact on risk estimates when incorporating damage accumulation and earthquake sequences using the proposed methodology versus the conventional approach, which assumes only independent mainshocks affecting buildings in their intact state. The results reveal that the conventional approach underestimates the average annual losses for these five URM buildings in Central Italy by 45%–85%. Although the level of underestimation may vary for other URM buildings in other regions, it is undeniable that the conventional approach consistently underestimates the risk for URM structures by a significant margin.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 4","pages":"1172-1190"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4304","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings are highly susceptible to cumulative damage, as demonstrated by the damage observations collected during and after numerous earthquake sequences. However, most previous numerical studies assessing cumulative damage in URM buildings have failed to fully capture the extent of the phenomenon observed in real events. This article aims to address this gap by applying a newly developed methodology for modeling the accumulation of damage in URM buildings in risk assessment case studies. This methodology quantifies the cumulative damage using an energy- and displacement-based damage index (DI) within a component-based framework. The methodology is validated using data from the URM school building in Visso that sustained severe, progressive damage during the 2016 Central Italy earthquake sequence. Additionally, this DI is employed to develop hazard-consistent, damage-state-dependent fragility curves for five case-study URM buildings through consecutive nonlinear dynamic analyses. The fragility analysis results align with real-world observations, indicating a significant reduction in structural capacity due to cumulative damage. These set of fragility curves are then utilized in a risk assessment exercise. The last part of this study compares the impact on risk estimates when incorporating damage accumulation and earthquake sequences using the proposed methodology versus the conventional approach, which assumes only independent mainshocks affecting buildings in their intact state. The results reveal that the conventional approach underestimates the average annual losses for these five URM buildings in Central Italy by 45%–85%. Although the level of underestimation may vary for other URM buildings in other regions, it is undeniable that the conventional approach consistently underestimates the risk for URM structures by a significant margin.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信