Novel biophysical skin biomarkers discriminate topical anti-inflammatory treatments based on their potential for local adverse effects

Simon G. Danby, Stephen Matcher, Robert Byers, Rosie Taylor, Sura Sahib, Paul Andrew, Kirsty Brown, Linda Kay, Carl Wright, Abi Pinnock, John Chittock, Mengqiu Duan, Amy Cha, Roni Adiri, Chuanbo Zang, John Werth, Michael J. Cork
{"title":"Novel biophysical skin biomarkers discriminate topical anti-inflammatory treatments based on their potential for local adverse effects","authors":"Simon G. Danby,&nbsp;Stephen Matcher,&nbsp;Robert Byers,&nbsp;Rosie Taylor,&nbsp;Sura Sahib,&nbsp;Paul Andrew,&nbsp;Kirsty Brown,&nbsp;Linda Kay,&nbsp;Carl Wright,&nbsp;Abi Pinnock,&nbsp;John Chittock,&nbsp;Mengqiu Duan,&nbsp;Amy Cha,&nbsp;Roni Adiri,&nbsp;Chuanbo Zang,&nbsp;John Werth,&nbsp;Michael J. Cork","doi":"10.1002/jvc2.540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Topical corticosteroids (TCS) are efficacious treatments for inflammatory skin conditions, however, there is a risk of adverse effects; understanding how best to use these treatments is an unmet research priority shared by patients and healthcare professionals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To develop non-invasive biomarkers of local adverse effects to facilitate the optimisation of topical therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An observer-blind randomised within-subject controlled trial in atopic dermatitis patients was undertaken (NCT04194814) comparing betamethasone valerate 0.1% cream (BMV) to a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory treatment, crisaborole 2% ointment (CRB). Participants underwent 4 weeks twice-daily treatment with CRB on one forearm and BMV on the other (left/right randomised). Skin properties were assessed on days 1, 15, 29 of treatment and again on day 57, including imaging of skin microstructure using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR)-Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopic assessment of stratum corneum molecular structure. The primary outcome was the difference in the change in epidermal thickness from days 1 to 29.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-seven participants received the first dose, of which 32 completed the study (all 37 were included in the analysis). Pathologic epidermal thinning at day 29 was significantly greater (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) at sites treated with BMV (−31.66; 95% confidence interval: −35.31, −28.01 µm) compared to CRB (−13.76; −17.42, −10.10 µm). From a panel of exploratory biomarkers, superficial plexus depth and stratum corneum carboxyl group levels had the greatest ability to discriminate the effects of the TCS treatment (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>BMV induced 2.3x more pathologic epidermal thinning than CRB after 4 weeks of treatment, suggesting that CRB may be more appropriate for longer-term, proactive-based, treatment strategies where the risks of adverse effects are greatest. By monitoring treatment effects using OCT and ATR-FTIR spectroscopy, two new non-invasive biomarkers of skin health have been identified with the potential to help optimise future safe treatment strategies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":94325,"journal":{"name":"JEADV clinical practice","volume":"4 1","pages":"103-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jvc2.540","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEADV clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jvc2.540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Topical corticosteroids (TCS) are efficacious treatments for inflammatory skin conditions, however, there is a risk of adverse effects; understanding how best to use these treatments is an unmet research priority shared by patients and healthcare professionals.

Objectives

To develop non-invasive biomarkers of local adverse effects to facilitate the optimisation of topical therapy.

Methods

An observer-blind randomised within-subject controlled trial in atopic dermatitis patients was undertaken (NCT04194814) comparing betamethasone valerate 0.1% cream (BMV) to a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory treatment, crisaborole 2% ointment (CRB). Participants underwent 4 weeks twice-daily treatment with CRB on one forearm and BMV on the other (left/right randomised). Skin properties were assessed on days 1, 15, 29 of treatment and again on day 57, including imaging of skin microstructure using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR)-Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopic assessment of stratum corneum molecular structure. The primary outcome was the difference in the change in epidermal thickness from days 1 to 29.

Results

Thirty-seven participants received the first dose, of which 32 completed the study (all 37 were included in the analysis). Pathologic epidermal thinning at day 29 was significantly greater (p < 0.0001) at sites treated with BMV (−31.66; 95% confidence interval: −35.31, −28.01 µm) compared to CRB (−13.76; −17.42, −10.10 µm). From a panel of exploratory biomarkers, superficial plexus depth and stratum corneum carboxyl group levels had the greatest ability to discriminate the effects of the TCS treatment (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

BMV induced 2.3x more pathologic epidermal thinning than CRB after 4 weeks of treatment, suggesting that CRB may be more appropriate for longer-term, proactive-based, treatment strategies where the risks of adverse effects are greatest. By monitoring treatment effects using OCT and ATR-FTIR spectroscopy, two new non-invasive biomarkers of skin health have been identified with the potential to help optimise future safe treatment strategies.

Abstract Image

背景 外用皮质类固醇(TCS)是治疗炎症性皮肤病的有效方法,但也有产生不良反应的风险;了解如何最好地使用这些疗法是患者和医疗保健专业人员共同关心的一个尚未实现的研究重点。 目标 开发局部不良反应的非侵入性生物标志物,以促进局部疗法的优化。 方法 在特应性皮炎患者中开展了一项观察盲随机对照试验(NCT04194814),将0.1%戊酸倍他米松乳膏(BMV)与一种非甾体抗炎疗法--2%crisaborole软膏(CRB)进行比较。参试者在一只前臂上使用 CRB,另一只前臂上使用 BMV(左/右随机),每天两次,为期 4 周。在治疗的第 1 天、第 15 天、第 29 天和第 57 天再次评估皮肤特性,包括使用光学相干断层扫描 (OCT) 和衰减全反射 (ATR) - 傅立叶变换红外光谱评估角质层分子结构。主要结果是第 1 天到第 29 天表皮厚度变化的差异。 结果 37 名参与者接受了第一剂治疗,其中 32 人完成了研究(所有 37 人都纳入了分析)。与 CRB(-13.76;-17.42,-10.10 µm)相比,BMV(-31.66;95% 置信区间:-35.31,-28.01 µm)治疗部位在第 29 天的病理表皮厚度明显增加(p < 0.0001)。在一组探索性生物标志物中,浅表神经丛深度和角质层羧基水平区分 TCS 治疗效果的能力最强(p < 0.0001)。 结论 4 周治疗后,BMV 诱导的病理性表皮变薄是 CRB 的 2.3 倍,这表明 CRB 可能更适合长期、主动的治疗策略,因为在这种治疗策略中,不良反应的风险最大。通过使用 OCT 和 ATR-FTIR 光谱监测治疗效果,我们发现了两种新的非侵入性皮肤健康生物标志物,它们有望帮助优化未来的安全治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信