Conservation of the Atlantic Forest trees through Indigenous sustainability

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Francys Alves Paulino, Orivaldo Nunes Júnior, João Carlos Ferreira de Melo Júnior
{"title":"Conservation of the Atlantic Forest trees through Indigenous sustainability","authors":"Francys Alves Paulino,&nbsp;Orivaldo Nunes Júnior,&nbsp;João Carlos Ferreira de Melo Júnior","doi":"10.1002/fee.2839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Atlantic Forest harbors one of the most diverse and threatened tropical forest biotas worldwide. Recognized as a global biodiversity hotspot, the biome extends along Brazil's Atlantic coast and into eastern Paraguay and northeastern Argentina, spanning a wide range of latitudinal, longitudinal, altitudinal, and climatic gradients. Its flora includes taxa from the Amazon Rainforest, Cerrado gallery forests, and the Andean region, encompassing approximately 25,000 species of vascular plants, 48% of which are endemic and 3400 of which are trees (Oliveira-Filho and Fontes <span>2000</span>).</p><p>The degradation of the Atlantic Forest reflects centuries of human expansion triggered by the arrival of European colonizers in the 16th century CE. Over time, economic cycles, such as those associated with brazilwood, sugarcane, gold, and coffee, as well as urbanization, ranching, and railway/road construction, have severely impacted the forest (Dean <span>2013</span>). Today, much of the Atlantic Forest consists of patches of secondary forests at varying stages of recovery, monoculture plantations of non-native trees, and small forest fragments surrounded by open areas dominated by anthropogenic landscapes (Tabarelli <i>et al</i>. <span>2010</span>). An estimated ~120 million people (70% of Brazil's population) live along Brazil's Atlantic coast, exacerbating pressure on the remaining forest, which currently covers only 12% of its original extent (SOS Mata Atlântica <span>2023</span>). In this context, urban expansion, industrialization, intensive agriculture, and mining not only accelerate deforestation and biodiversity loss but also erode the ancestral knowledge and cultures of Indigenous peoples who have inhabited these lands for millennia.</p><p>Currently, Brazil is home to 305 Indigenous peoples who speak 274 different languages. These groups inhabit territories composed of forests and other associated non-forest systems. The differences exhibited by these communities reflect their sociocultural variety, arising from distinct logics, conceptions, and practices specific to each people and shaped by various historical, social, and environmental contexts (Cunha <i>et al</i>. <span>2022</span>).</p><p>Among the Indigenous peoples coexisting within the Atlantic Forest are the Guarani (Guarani Mbya), Kaingang, Pataxó, Tupinambá, and Tupiniquim. For these groups, nature and biodiversity not only are deeply connected with beliefs, knowledge, history, and culture but also depend on management techniques to better ensure their persistence over time. Embedded within multiple dimensions—social, cultural, political, economic, environmental, philosophical, and spiritual—traditional Indigenous knowledge fosters a sustainable way of relating to nature, land, and biodiversity, contributing to landscape and biodiversity conservation (Cunha <i>et al</i>. <span>2022</span>).</p><p>Indigenous cultural practices are expressed through a diversity of songs, dances, competitions, prayers, mythic narratives, and languages; the development of plant cultivation techniques as well as hunting and fishing technologies; medicinal, taxonomic, soils-, and landscape-based knowledge; and craftsmanship, including basket weaving, ceramics, textiles (Cunha <i>et al</i>. <span>2022</span>), and wooden handicrafts. For millennia, the transgenerational transmission of Indigenous knowledge has shaped landscapes and even influenced the organization of certain biological communities (Maezumi <i>et al</i>. <span>2023</span>), with repercussions on the management of culturally important tree species.</p><p>The historical degradation of the Atlantic Forest is linked with the historical genocide of Indigenous peoples, including forest-dwelling populations. Prior to European arrival, an estimated 3.4 million Indigenous people lived within the Atlantic Forest domain (Cunha <i>et al</i>. <span>2022</span>). After colonization, the widespread mortality among Indigenous populations reduced the original female population by approximately 50% (O'Fallon and Fehren-Schmitz <span>2011</span>).</p><p>The impacts of climate change, including but not limited to biodiversity loss, extreme weather, and food insecurity, continue to occur despite increasing attention to the role of forests in the mitigation thereof (Hossain <span>2021</span>). The ongoing transformation of forest landscapes through tree removal and intentional burning erodes natural ecosystems, promoting agricultural expansion and economic exploitation of wood for fuel and timber. Consequently and cumulatively, these threats impact both biodiversity and humans, as forests provide food, medicine, and cultural resources for local communities. By stabilizing rivers and watersheds, forests also help to minimize floods and soil erosion (Pistora <span>2024</span>).</p><p>Anthropic pressures on the Atlantic Forest have increased substantially in recent decades, intensifying the impacts on already vulnerable traditional communities, often forcing their displacement (Pistora <span>2024</span>). In Brazil, weak environmental governance and policy implementation serve to imperil the Atlantic Forest even more. Corruption, economic pressures from large industries, and inadequate enforcement hinder effective protection of Indigenous territories and biodiversity conservation areas (SOS Mata Atlântica <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Finding viable and sustainable solutions to mitigate climate-change effects, such as forest preservation (Pistora <span>2024</span>; Hossain <span>2021</span>), will require integrating Western science with traditional Indigenous knowledge and promoting public policies focused on the creation of reserves, protection of Indigenous territories, and ecological restoration. Thus, there is an urgent need to discuss conservation alternatives and the prudent use of available natural resources (Hossain <span>2021</span>; Gazing Wolf <i>et al</i>. <span>2024</span>), with special attention on forest conservation, Indigenous knowledge, and sustainability.</p><p>Indigenous peoples already play a fundamental role in the sustainable management of their territories, and Indigenous knowledge could become a new paradigm for biological conservation, reframing human actions historically rooted in Eurocentrism (Gazing Wolf <i>et al</i>. <span>2024</span>). Among scientists, there is growing consensus about the critical role that local Indigenous knowledge plays in discovering, cataloging, and conserving biodiversity. It is essential that Indigenous knowledge becomes a model that, through societal changes, allows the establishment of Indigenous-led spaces to promote full dialogue between diverse forms of knowledge, including Western science. This approach should grant equal value to Indigenous perspectives not only in fostering discovery and problem solving but also in addressing gaps in biodiversity discovery, documentation, and conservation (Gazing Wolf <i>et al</i>. <span>2024</span>; Guimarães <i>et al</i>. <span>2024</span>). Initiatives to maintain forested areas through practices that integrate cultural traditions with wood conservation measures, such as Indigenous territorial planning by the Guarani Mbya in southern Brazil, are promising.</p><p>Indigenous ways of being and living, expressed through a balanced and sustainable relationship with the land, can drive regional and international collaborations to combat deforestation and conserve the Atlantic Forest. This represents a possible path to mitigate climate change, one that emphasizes the need for the participation of Indigenous peoples in decision-making processes within governance bodies to formulate climate and environmental policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2839","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.2839","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Atlantic Forest harbors one of the most diverse and threatened tropical forest biotas worldwide. Recognized as a global biodiversity hotspot, the biome extends along Brazil's Atlantic coast and into eastern Paraguay and northeastern Argentina, spanning a wide range of latitudinal, longitudinal, altitudinal, and climatic gradients. Its flora includes taxa from the Amazon Rainforest, Cerrado gallery forests, and the Andean region, encompassing approximately 25,000 species of vascular plants, 48% of which are endemic and 3400 of which are trees (Oliveira-Filho and Fontes 2000).

The degradation of the Atlantic Forest reflects centuries of human expansion triggered by the arrival of European colonizers in the 16th century CE. Over time, economic cycles, such as those associated with brazilwood, sugarcane, gold, and coffee, as well as urbanization, ranching, and railway/road construction, have severely impacted the forest (Dean 2013). Today, much of the Atlantic Forest consists of patches of secondary forests at varying stages of recovery, monoculture plantations of non-native trees, and small forest fragments surrounded by open areas dominated by anthropogenic landscapes (Tabarelli et al2010). An estimated ~120 million people (70% of Brazil's population) live along Brazil's Atlantic coast, exacerbating pressure on the remaining forest, which currently covers only 12% of its original extent (SOS Mata Atlântica 2023). In this context, urban expansion, industrialization, intensive agriculture, and mining not only accelerate deforestation and biodiversity loss but also erode the ancestral knowledge and cultures of Indigenous peoples who have inhabited these lands for millennia.

Currently, Brazil is home to 305 Indigenous peoples who speak 274 different languages. These groups inhabit territories composed of forests and other associated non-forest systems. The differences exhibited by these communities reflect their sociocultural variety, arising from distinct logics, conceptions, and practices specific to each people and shaped by various historical, social, and environmental contexts (Cunha et al2022).

Among the Indigenous peoples coexisting within the Atlantic Forest are the Guarani (Guarani Mbya), Kaingang, Pataxó, Tupinambá, and Tupiniquim. For these groups, nature and biodiversity not only are deeply connected with beliefs, knowledge, history, and culture but also depend on management techniques to better ensure their persistence over time. Embedded within multiple dimensions—social, cultural, political, economic, environmental, philosophical, and spiritual—traditional Indigenous knowledge fosters a sustainable way of relating to nature, land, and biodiversity, contributing to landscape and biodiversity conservation (Cunha et al2022).

Indigenous cultural practices are expressed through a diversity of songs, dances, competitions, prayers, mythic narratives, and languages; the development of plant cultivation techniques as well as hunting and fishing technologies; medicinal, taxonomic, soils-, and landscape-based knowledge; and craftsmanship, including basket weaving, ceramics, textiles (Cunha et al2022), and wooden handicrafts. For millennia, the transgenerational transmission of Indigenous knowledge has shaped landscapes and even influenced the organization of certain biological communities (Maezumi et al2023), with repercussions on the management of culturally important tree species.

The historical degradation of the Atlantic Forest is linked with the historical genocide of Indigenous peoples, including forest-dwelling populations. Prior to European arrival, an estimated 3.4 million Indigenous people lived within the Atlantic Forest domain (Cunha et al2022). After colonization, the widespread mortality among Indigenous populations reduced the original female population by approximately 50% (O'Fallon and Fehren-Schmitz 2011).

The impacts of climate change, including but not limited to biodiversity loss, extreme weather, and food insecurity, continue to occur despite increasing attention to the role of forests in the mitigation thereof (Hossain 2021). The ongoing transformation of forest landscapes through tree removal and intentional burning erodes natural ecosystems, promoting agricultural expansion and economic exploitation of wood for fuel and timber. Consequently and cumulatively, these threats impact both biodiversity and humans, as forests provide food, medicine, and cultural resources for local communities. By stabilizing rivers and watersheds, forests also help to minimize floods and soil erosion (Pistora 2024).

Anthropic pressures on the Atlantic Forest have increased substantially in recent decades, intensifying the impacts on already vulnerable traditional communities, often forcing their displacement (Pistora 2024). In Brazil, weak environmental governance and policy implementation serve to imperil the Atlantic Forest even more. Corruption, economic pressures from large industries, and inadequate enforcement hinder effective protection of Indigenous territories and biodiversity conservation areas (SOS Mata Atlântica 2023).

Finding viable and sustainable solutions to mitigate climate-change effects, such as forest preservation (Pistora 2024; Hossain 2021), will require integrating Western science with traditional Indigenous knowledge and promoting public policies focused on the creation of reserves, protection of Indigenous territories, and ecological restoration. Thus, there is an urgent need to discuss conservation alternatives and the prudent use of available natural resources (Hossain 2021; Gazing Wolf et al2024), with special attention on forest conservation, Indigenous knowledge, and sustainability.

Indigenous peoples already play a fundamental role in the sustainable management of their territories, and Indigenous knowledge could become a new paradigm for biological conservation, reframing human actions historically rooted in Eurocentrism (Gazing Wolf et al2024). Among scientists, there is growing consensus about the critical role that local Indigenous knowledge plays in discovering, cataloging, and conserving biodiversity. It is essential that Indigenous knowledge becomes a model that, through societal changes, allows the establishment of Indigenous-led spaces to promote full dialogue between diverse forms of knowledge, including Western science. This approach should grant equal value to Indigenous perspectives not only in fostering discovery and problem solving but also in addressing gaps in biodiversity discovery, documentation, and conservation (Gazing Wolf et al2024; Guimarães et al2024). Initiatives to maintain forested areas through practices that integrate cultural traditions with wood conservation measures, such as Indigenous territorial planning by the Guarani Mbya in southern Brazil, are promising.

Indigenous ways of being and living, expressed through a balanced and sustainable relationship with the land, can drive regional and international collaborations to combat deforestation and conserve the Atlantic Forest. This represents a possible path to mitigate climate change, one that emphasizes the need for the participation of Indigenous peoples in decision-making processes within governance bodies to formulate climate and environmental policies.

通过土著可持续性保护大西洋森林树木
大西洋森林拥有世界上最多样化和最受威胁的热带森林生物之一。作为公认的全球生物多样性热点,该生物群沿着巴西的大西洋海岸延伸到巴拉圭东部和阿根廷东北部,跨越了广泛的纬度、纵向、高度和气候梯度。它的植物群包括来自亚马逊雨林、塞拉多走廊森林和安第斯地区的分类群,包括大约25,000种维管植物,其中48%是特有的,其中3400种是树木(Oliveira-Filho和Fontes 2000)。大西洋森林的退化反映了公元16世纪欧洲殖民者的到来引发的几个世纪的人类扩张。随着时间的推移,经济周期,例如与巴西木材、甘蔗、黄金和咖啡相关的经济周期,以及城市化、牧场和铁路/公路建设,严重影响了森林(Dean 2013)。今天,大部分大西洋森林由处于不同恢复阶段的次生林斑块、非原生树木的单一种植人工林以及被人为景观主导的开放区域包围的小森林碎片组成(Tabarelli et al. 2010)。据估计,约有1.2亿人(占巴西人口的70%)生活在巴西的大西洋沿岸,这加剧了对剩余森林的压力,目前仅覆盖其原始面积的12% (SOS Mata atlntica 2023)。在这种背景下,城市扩张、工业化、集约化农业和采矿不仅加速了森林砍伐和生物多样性的丧失,而且侵蚀了居住在这些土地上数千年的土著人民的祖先知识和文化。目前,巴西有305个土著民族,他们说274种不同的语言。这些群体居住在由森林和其他相关的非森林系统组成的领土上。这些社区所表现出的差异反映了他们的社会文化多样性,这些多样性源于每个人特有的独特逻辑、概念和实践,并受到各种历史、社会和环境背景的影响(Cunha et al. 2022)。在大西洋森林中共存的土著民族有瓜拉尼人(瓜拉尼Mbya)、Kaingang、Pataxó、tupinamb<e:1>和Tupiniquim。对这些群体来说,自然和生物多样性不仅与信仰、知识、历史和文化密切相关,而且还依赖于管理技术,以更好地确保它们随着时间的推移而持续下去。传统土著知识根植于社会、文化、政治、经济、环境、哲学和精神等多个维度,促进了与自然、土地和生物多样性的可持续联系,有助于景观和生物多样性保护(Cunha et al. 2022)。土著文化习俗通过多种多样的歌曲、舞蹈、比赛、祈祷、神话叙述和语言来表达;植物栽培技术和渔猎技术的发展;医学、分类学、土壤和景观知识;手工艺,包括编织篮子、陶瓷、纺织品(Cunha et al. 2022)和木制手工艺品。数千年来,土著知识的跨代传播塑造了景观,甚至影响了某些生物群落的组织(Maezumi et al. 2023),对文化上重要树种的管理产生了影响。大西洋森林的历史退化与历史上对土著人民,包括森林居民的种族灭绝有关。在欧洲人到来之前,估计有340万土著居民生活在大西洋森林地区(Cunha et al. 2022)。殖民化后,土著人口中普遍存在的死亡率使原始女性人口减少了约50% (O'Fallon和Fehren-Schmitz 2011)。气候变化的影响,包括但不限于生物多样性丧失、极端天气和粮食不安全,继续发生,尽管人们越来越关注森林在缓解这些影响方面的作用(Hossain 2021)。通过砍伐树木和故意焚烧正在改变森林景观,侵蚀了自然生态系统,促进了农业扩张和木材燃料和木材的经济开发。由于森林为当地社区提供食物、医药和文化资源,这些威胁累积起来对生物多样性和人类都产生了影响。通过稳定河流和流域,森林还有助于减少洪水和土壤侵蚀(Pistora 2024)。近几十年来,大西洋森林的人为压力大幅增加,加剧了对本已脆弱的传统社区的影响,往往迫使他们流离失所(Pistora 2024)。在巴西,薄弱的环境治理和政策执行对大西洋森林的危害更大。 腐败、大型企业的经济压力以及执法不力阻碍了对土著领土和生物多样性保护区的有效保护(SOS Mata atlntica 2023)。寻找可行和可持续的解决方案来减轻气候变化的影响,例如森林保护(Pistora 2024;Hossain 2021),将需要将西方科学与传统的土著知识相结合,并促进以建立保护区、保护土著领土和生态恢复为重点的公共政策。因此,迫切需要讨论保护替代方案和谨慎使用现有自然资源(Hossain 2021;凝视沃尔夫等人(2024),特别关注森林保护,土著知识和可持续性。土著人民已经在其领土的可持续管理中发挥了重要作用,土著知识可能成为生物保护的新范式,重塑历史上植根于欧洲中心主义的人类行为(凝视沃尔夫等人,2024)。在科学家中,越来越多的人认为当地土著知识在发现、编目和保护生物多样性方面发挥着关键作用。土著知识必须成为一种模式,通过社会变革,允许建立土著主导的空间,以促进包括西方科学在内的各种知识形式之间的充分对话。这种方法应该给予土著观点同等的价值,不仅在促进发现和解决问题方面,而且在解决生物多样性发现、记录和保护方面的差距方面(凝视沃尔夫等人,2024;guimar<e:1>等人,2024)。通过将文化传统与木材保护措施相结合的做法来维护森林地区的倡议,如巴西南部瓜拉尼Mbya的土著领土规划,是有希望的。通过与土地的平衡和可持续关系表达的土著生存和生活方式,可以推动区域和国际合作,打击毁林和保护大西洋森林。这是减缓气候变化的一条可能途径,强调需要土著人民参与治理机构内制定气候和环境政策的决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
18.30
自引率
1.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is a publication by the Ecological Society of America that focuses on the significance of ecology and environmental science in various aspects of research and problem-solving. The journal covers topics such as biodiversity conservation, ecosystem preservation, natural resource management, public policy, and other related areas. The publication features a range of content, including peer-reviewed articles, editorials, commentaries, letters, and occasional special issues and topical series. It releases ten issues per year, excluding January and July. ESA members receive both print and electronic copies of the journal, while institutional subscriptions are also available. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is highly regarded in the field, as indicated by its ranking in the 2021 Journal Citation Reports by Clarivate Analytics. The journal is ranked 4th out of 174 in ecology journals and 11th out of 279 in environmental sciences journals. Its impact factor for 2021 is reported as 13.789, which further demonstrates its influence and importance in the scientific community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信