Evaluation of Diagnoses According to ICD-10 and ICPC-2 in Family Medicine Practice: A Retrospective Study

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Olgun Göktaş
{"title":"Evaluation of Diagnoses According to ICD-10 and ICPC-2 in Family Medicine Practice: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Olgun Göktaş","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/7146424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Introduction:</b> After the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, briefly ICD (ICD-10), the World Health Organization (WHO) accepted the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC-2) as a reason for encounter classification of diagnoses in primary healthcare services. The study aimed to assess the degree of alignment between diagnoses encoded with the ICD-10 and, those coded using the ICPC-2.</p>\n <p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> We collected the diagnoses coded with the ICD-10 of 42,782 patients registered in the Uludağ University Family Health Center, Bursa, Turkey. The ICD-10 codes were converted to ICPC-2 codes with the program in the family medicine information registration system. Diagnoses in the database were analyzed. <i>p</i> values less than 0.05 were considered significant in the study. Analyses were made with the SPSS 25.0 package program.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Of the 42,782 diagnoses with codes in ICD-10, a total of 218 diagnoses (0.51%) did not have an equivalent in ICPC-2. On the other hand, it was determined that a total of 463 diagnoses (1.08%) in ICD-10 had 2 or more codes in ICPC-2.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> According to our results in family medicine practice, the equivalents of ICD-10 and ICPC-2 codes were different in number and percentage. It is ideal for individual health and research that the diagnosis codes in family medicine are the same as the codes in other secondary and tertiary care clinics. Since health requires holisticity, we recommend that both classifications be integrated and revised to be globally understandable and provide complementary coding in different clinical applications.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/7146424","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/7146424","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: After the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, briefly ICD (ICD-10), the World Health Organization (WHO) accepted the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC-2) as a reason for encounter classification of diagnoses in primary healthcare services. The study aimed to assess the degree of alignment between diagnoses encoded with the ICD-10 and, those coded using the ICPC-2.

Materials and Methods: We collected the diagnoses coded with the ICD-10 of 42,782 patients registered in the Uludağ University Family Health Center, Bursa, Turkey. The ICD-10 codes were converted to ICPC-2 codes with the program in the family medicine information registration system. Diagnoses in the database were analyzed. p values less than 0.05 were considered significant in the study. Analyses were made with the SPSS 25.0 package program.

Results: Of the 42,782 diagnoses with codes in ICD-10, a total of 218 diagnoses (0.51%) did not have an equivalent in ICPC-2. On the other hand, it was determined that a total of 463 diagnoses (1.08%) in ICD-10 had 2 or more codes in ICPC-2.

Conclusion: According to our results in family medicine practice, the equivalents of ICD-10 and ICPC-2 codes were different in number and percentage. It is ideal for individual health and research that the diagnosis codes in family medicine are the same as the codes in other secondary and tertiary care clinics. Since health requires holisticity, we recommend that both classifications be integrated and revised to be globally understandable and provide complementary coding in different clinical applications.

家庭医学实践中ICD-10和ICPC-2诊断评价的回顾性研究
简介:继国际疾病和相关健康问题统计分类(ICD-10)之后,世界卫生组织(WHO)接受了国际初级保健分类(ICPC-2)作为初级卫生保健服务诊断遇到分类的理由。该研究旨在评估用ICD-10编码的诊断与使用ICPC-2编码的诊断之间的一致性程度。材料和方法:我们收集了在土耳其布尔萨乌卢达乌大学家庭健康中心登记的42,782例患者的ICD-10编码诊断。在家庭医学信息登记系统中使用程序将ICD-10代码转换为ICPC-2代码。对数据库中的诊断进行分析。P值小于0.05认为研究显著。采用SPSS 25.0软件包进行分析。结果:在包含ICD-10编码的42,782例诊断中,共有218例(0.51%)诊断在ICPC-2中没有对应的编码。另一方面,在ICD-10中共有463例诊断(1.08%)在ICPC-2中有2个或更多的编码。结论:根据我们在家庭医学实践中的结果,ICD-10和ICPC-2编码在数量和百分比上存在差异。家庭医学的诊断代码与其他二级和三级保健诊所的代码相同,这对个人健康和研究是理想的。由于卫生需要整体性,我们建议对这两种分类进行整合和修订,使其在全球范围内可理解,并在不同的临床应用中提供补充编码。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信