Supporting New Ways of Working for Social Workers Through High Performance Work Practices: Sustaining Professional Identity

IF 6 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Graeme Currie, Ila Bharatan, Sharanya Mahesh, Robin Miller
{"title":"Supporting New Ways of Working for Social Workers Through High Performance Work Practices: Sustaining Professional Identity","authors":"Graeme Currie,&nbsp;Ila Bharatan,&nbsp;Sharanya Mahesh,&nbsp;Robin Miller","doi":"10.1002/hrm.22271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In our study, we examine implementation of strength-based practice (SBP) that invokes a new way of working for social workers in England. We note two antecedent conditions to support new ways of working. First, hybrid managers, who combine professional and organizational perspectives, act as a conduit for implementation of new ways of working through supporting implementation of high performance work practices (HPWPs). Second, the financial context faced by social care providers influences whether new ways of working, and HPWPs associated with this, aim to improve productivity, or enhance capability and commitment of social workers. We identify three HPWPs that support the new way of working because they align with professional identity of social workers. First, hybrid manager jobs were designed to afford opportunity for recruitment of appropriately able social workers to enact strategic influence over SBP implementation. Second, intervention to support peer-to-peer learning enhanced the ability of social workers to deliver SBP, and also motivated social workers toward SBP implementation because they retained professional autonomy in developing their practice. Third, performance management intervention was developmental rather than judgmental, designed to enhance ability of social workers to deliver SBP. Similar to the peer learning intervention, it remained within control of social workers, hence motivated them to engage with SBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":48310,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Management","volume":"64 2","pages":"503-521"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hrm.22271","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrm.22271","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In our study, we examine implementation of strength-based practice (SBP) that invokes a new way of working for social workers in England. We note two antecedent conditions to support new ways of working. First, hybrid managers, who combine professional and organizational perspectives, act as a conduit for implementation of new ways of working through supporting implementation of high performance work practices (HPWPs). Second, the financial context faced by social care providers influences whether new ways of working, and HPWPs associated with this, aim to improve productivity, or enhance capability and commitment of social workers. We identify three HPWPs that support the new way of working because they align with professional identity of social workers. First, hybrid manager jobs were designed to afford opportunity for recruitment of appropriately able social workers to enact strategic influence over SBP implementation. Second, intervention to support peer-to-peer learning enhanced the ability of social workers to deliver SBP, and also motivated social workers toward SBP implementation because they retained professional autonomy in developing their practice. Third, performance management intervention was developmental rather than judgmental, designed to enhance ability of social workers to deliver SBP. Similar to the peer learning intervention, it remained within control of social workers, hence motivated them to engage with SBP.

Abstract Image

通过高绩效工作实践支持社会工作者的新工作方式:维持职业身份
在我们的研究中,我们研究了基于力量的实践(SBP)的实施,它为英国的社会工作者提供了一种新的工作方式。我们注意到支持新的工作方式的两个先决条件。首先,混合型管理者,他们结合了专业和组织的观点,通过支持高绩效工作实践(HPWPs)的实施,作为实施新工作方式的渠道。其次,社会服务提供者所面临的财务环境影响了新的工作方式,以及与之相关的HPWPs,是否旨在提高生产力,或增强社会工作者的能力和承诺。我们确定了三个支持新工作方式的hpwp,因为它们符合社会工作者的专业身份。首先,混合型经理职位的设计是为了提供招聘适当能力的社会工作者的机会,以制定对SBP实施的战略影响。第二,支持同伴学习的干预提高了社会工作者提供SBP的能力,也激励了社会工作者实施SBP,因为他们在发展实践中保留了专业自主权。第三,绩效管理干预是发展性的,而不是判断性的,旨在提高社会工作者提供SBP的能力。与同伴学习干预类似,它仍然在社会工作者的控制范围内,因此激励他们参与SBP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Covering the broad spectrum of contemporary human resource management, this journal provides academics and practicing managers with the latest concepts, tools, and information for effective problem solving and decision making in this field. Broad in scope, it explores issues of societal, organizational, and individual relevance. Journal articles discuss new theories, new techniques, case studies, models, and research trends of particular significance to practicing HR managers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信