Influence of Different Application Methods of Crude Lipopolysaccharides on Plant Growth, Productivity and on the Control of Tomato Bacterial Leaf Spot and Powdery Mildew
Valdeir Nunes Carvalho, Rosicléia da Silva, Rômulo Pedro Macêdo Lima, Aldemir Chaim, Bernardo de Almeida Halfeld-Vieira
{"title":"Influence of Different Application Methods of Crude Lipopolysaccharides on Plant Growth, Productivity and on the Control of Tomato Bacterial Leaf Spot and Powdery Mildew","authors":"Valdeir Nunes Carvalho, Rosicléia da Silva, Rômulo Pedro Macêdo Lima, Aldemir Chaim, Bernardo de Almeida Halfeld-Vieira","doi":"10.1111/jph.70048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) are structural components of gram-negative bacteria that potentially induce innate immune responses in plants. A previous study demonstrated that an LPS acts as an elicitor, triggering systemic resistance against bacterial spot in tomato caused by <i>Xanthomonas euvesicatoria</i> pv. <i>perforans</i>. However, its long-term impact on plant growth, disease control and productivity remained unclear. The first experiment determined the optimal concentration of the crude LPS for effective bacterial spot control without deleterious effects on plants. The second experiment evaluated LPS application methods and timings that provide balanced benefits for plant growth, productivity and control of bacterial spot and powdery mildew. Additionally, the involvement of polyphenoloxidase and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) in disease resistance was also investigated through gene expression assays. Results estimated 7.3 μg/mL as the optimal dose for minimising disease severity without compromising chlorophyll content. At least one application in the vegetative stage, using either electrostatic spraying or soil dispensing, yielded the most balanced outcomes for plant growth, productivity and disease control. Electrostatic spraying provided an average reduction in severity of 60% for bacterial spot and 32% for powdery mildew, while soil dispensing provided 58% and 28%, respectively. These treatments also promoted increased <i>PAL</i> gene expression, suggesting that this enzyme is involved in the resistance response.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phytopathology","volume":"173 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jph.70048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) are structural components of gram-negative bacteria that potentially induce innate immune responses in plants. A previous study demonstrated that an LPS acts as an elicitor, triggering systemic resistance against bacterial spot in tomato caused by Xanthomonas euvesicatoria pv. perforans. However, its long-term impact on plant growth, disease control and productivity remained unclear. The first experiment determined the optimal concentration of the crude LPS for effective bacterial spot control without deleterious effects on plants. The second experiment evaluated LPS application methods and timings that provide balanced benefits for plant growth, productivity and control of bacterial spot and powdery mildew. Additionally, the involvement of polyphenoloxidase and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) in disease resistance was also investigated through gene expression assays. Results estimated 7.3 μg/mL as the optimal dose for minimising disease severity without compromising chlorophyll content. At least one application in the vegetative stage, using either electrostatic spraying or soil dispensing, yielded the most balanced outcomes for plant growth, productivity and disease control. Electrostatic spraying provided an average reduction in severity of 60% for bacterial spot and 32% for powdery mildew, while soil dispensing provided 58% and 28%, respectively. These treatments also promoted increased PAL gene expression, suggesting that this enzyme is involved in the resistance response.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Phytopathology publishes original and review articles on all scientific aspects of applied phytopathology in agricultural and horticultural crops. Preference is given to contributions improving our understanding of the biotic and abiotic determinants of plant diseases, including epidemics and damage potential, as a basis for innovative disease management, modelling and forecasting. This includes practical aspects and the development of methods for disease diagnosis as well as infection bioassays.
Studies at the population, organism, physiological, biochemical and molecular genetic level are welcome. The journal scope comprises the pathology and epidemiology of plant diseases caused by microbial pathogens, viruses and nematodes.
Accepted papers should advance our conceptual knowledge of plant diseases, rather than presenting descriptive or screening data unrelated to phytopathological mechanisms or functions. Results from unrepeated experimental conditions or data with no or inappropriate statistical processing will not be considered. Authors are encouraged to look at past issues to ensure adherence to the standards of the journal.