Two birds with one stone: sustainable smart spectrophotometric methods for concurrent determination of silodosin and mirabegron: application to dosage forms and greenness assessment

IF 4.3 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Khalid M. Badr El-Din, Sayed M. Derayea, Ahmed S. Ahmed, Mohamed Oraby, Mohamed A. Abdelshakour
{"title":"Two birds with one stone: sustainable smart spectrophotometric methods for concurrent determination of silodosin and mirabegron: application to dosage forms and greenness assessment","authors":"Khalid M. Badr El-Din,&nbsp;Sayed M. Derayea,&nbsp;Ahmed S. Ahmed,&nbsp;Mohamed Oraby,&nbsp;Mohamed A. Abdelshakour","doi":"10.1186/s13065-025-01411-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A new combination of silodosin and mirabegron has recently obtained approval in the Indian market for addressing the benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms associated with overactive bladder syndrome. In this study, we present four validated UV-spectrophotometric methods that rely on straightforward mathematical calculations for the quick and simultaneous assay of MRB and SLD in commercial tablets and synthetic mixes without the need for prior separation. The suggested methods include dual-wavelength, induced dual-wavelength, ratio difference, and area under the curve. These methods were effectively used to determine SLD and MRB simultaneously in combinations with severe spectrum overlap, showing excellent recoveries free from interference from pharmaceutical excipients. The proposed approaches were assessed and validated following the guidelines set forth by the International Conference for Harmonization (ICH). The methods exhibited linear ranges of 1–20 μg mL<sup>−1</sup> and 1–25 μg mL<sup>−1</sup> for SLD and MRB, respectively. Their environmental friendliness was assessed using the Analytical Greenness Calculator (AGREE) and The Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) tools, demonstrating their supremacy in terms of greenness compared to the reported chromatographic method. There were no appreciable variations in accuracy or precision between the reported chromatographic method and statistical comparisons based on t- and F values. Consequently, these suggested methods are deemed effective in routine analysis of SLD and MRB, serving as cost-effective alternatives in quality control laboratories lacking expensive chromatographic instruments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":496,"journal":{"name":"BMC Chemistry","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bmcchem.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13065-025-01411-7","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13065-025-01411-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A new combination of silodosin and mirabegron has recently obtained approval in the Indian market for addressing the benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms associated with overactive bladder syndrome. In this study, we present four validated UV-spectrophotometric methods that rely on straightforward mathematical calculations for the quick and simultaneous assay of MRB and SLD in commercial tablets and synthetic mixes without the need for prior separation. The suggested methods include dual-wavelength, induced dual-wavelength, ratio difference, and area under the curve. These methods were effectively used to determine SLD and MRB simultaneously in combinations with severe spectrum overlap, showing excellent recoveries free from interference from pharmaceutical excipients. The proposed approaches were assessed and validated following the guidelines set forth by the International Conference for Harmonization (ICH). The methods exhibited linear ranges of 1–20 μg mL−1 and 1–25 μg mL−1 for SLD and MRB, respectively. Their environmental friendliness was assessed using the Analytical Greenness Calculator (AGREE) and The Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI) tools, demonstrating their supremacy in terms of greenness compared to the reported chromatographic method. There were no appreciable variations in accuracy or precision between the reported chromatographic method and statistical comparisons based on t- and F values. Consequently, these suggested methods are deemed effective in routine analysis of SLD and MRB, serving as cost-effective alternatives in quality control laboratories lacking expensive chromatographic instruments.

一石二鸟:同时测定西洛多辛和米拉贝琼的可持续智能分光光度法:在剂型和绿色评估中的应用
西洛多辛和米拉贝琼的新组合最近获得了印度市场的批准,用于治疗与膀胱过度活动综合征相关的良性前列腺增生症状。在本研究中,我们介绍了四种经过验证的紫外分光光度法,这些方法依赖于简单的数学计算,可快速同时检测商品片剂和合成混合物中的 MRB 和 SLD,而无需事先分离。建议的方法包括双波长法、诱导双波长法、比值差法和曲线下面积法。这些方法被有效地用于同时测定具有严重光谱重叠的组合中的 SLD 和 MRB,并显示出优异的回收率,不受药用辅料的干扰。根据国际协调会议(ICH)制定的指导方针,对所提出的方法进行了评估和验证。SLD 和 MRB 方法的线性范围分别为 1-20 μg mL-1 和 1-25 μg mL-1。使用分析绿色度计算器(AGREE)和绿色分析程序指数(GAPI)工具对这两种方法的环保性进行了评估,结果表明与已报道的色谱法相比,这两种方法的环保性更胜一筹。报告的色谱法与基于 t 值和 F 值的统计比较在准确度和精密度方面没有明显差异。因此,这些建议的方法在 SLD 和 MRB 的常规分析中被认为是有效的,在缺乏昂贵色谱仪器的质量控制实验室中可作为具有成本效益的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Chemistry
BMC Chemistry Chemistry-General Chemistry
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
92
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Chemistry, formerly known as Chemistry Central Journal, is now part of the BMC series journals family. Chemistry Central Journal has served the chemistry community as a trusted open access resource for more than 10 years – and we are delighted to announce the next step on its journey. In January 2019 the journal has been renamed BMC Chemistry and now strengthens the BMC series footprint in the physical sciences by publishing quality articles and by pushing the boundaries of open chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信