Aaron E. Heap, Trent D. Penman, Lauren T. Bennett, Thomas A. Fairman
{"title":"Short-interval fires homogenise the structure of diverse temperate forests","authors":"Aaron E. Heap, Trent D. Penman, Lauren T. Bennett, Thomas A. Fairman","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Changing fire regimes can drive significant transformations in forest landscapes, including shifts to alternative stable states. However, these states have rarely been quantitatively described, limiting understanding of impacts on ecosystem services, biodiversity, and fire behaviour. Using aerial LiDAR data, we quantified multiple structural attributes of ‘reference’ and ‘alternative’ forest states across three structurally diverse forest types, dominated by either obligate seeder or resprouter eucalypt trees. Alternative forest states which have persisted for at least 70 years, arose from short-interval wildfires in the early 20th century; while return intervals of reference states were considered within the ecological tolerance. Results indicate significant transformation across all three forest types. Alternative states were structurally distinct and more homogeneous than reference states. Homogenisation was evident in mean and maximum canopy height, light penetration index, rumple index, and LiDAR leaf area index. Depending on forest type, percentage cover of large overstory trees was significantly lower in alternative states (4–7 %) compared with reference states (39–50 %). Mean height was between 71 % and 78 % lower, and maximum height 52–60 % lower than reference states. Measures of horizontal structural heterogeneity including rumple index (canopy ‘roughness’) and foliage height diversity were lower, suggesting a simplified canopy surface in alternative states, with scattered emergent overstory trees, and decreased vertical differentiation of strata. Moreover, the LiDAR-derived leaf area index and light penetration index indicated a more open environment than reference states. Our findings suggest short-interval wildfires drive widespread and persistent homogenisation of forest structure, potentially degrading ecosystem functions that support biodiversity and ecosystem services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"584 ","pages":"Article 122580"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037811272500088X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Changing fire regimes can drive significant transformations in forest landscapes, including shifts to alternative stable states. However, these states have rarely been quantitatively described, limiting understanding of impacts on ecosystem services, biodiversity, and fire behaviour. Using aerial LiDAR data, we quantified multiple structural attributes of ‘reference’ and ‘alternative’ forest states across three structurally diverse forest types, dominated by either obligate seeder or resprouter eucalypt trees. Alternative forest states which have persisted for at least 70 years, arose from short-interval wildfires in the early 20th century; while return intervals of reference states were considered within the ecological tolerance. Results indicate significant transformation across all three forest types. Alternative states were structurally distinct and more homogeneous than reference states. Homogenisation was evident in mean and maximum canopy height, light penetration index, rumple index, and LiDAR leaf area index. Depending on forest type, percentage cover of large overstory trees was significantly lower in alternative states (4–7 %) compared with reference states (39–50 %). Mean height was between 71 % and 78 % lower, and maximum height 52–60 % lower than reference states. Measures of horizontal structural heterogeneity including rumple index (canopy ‘roughness’) and foliage height diversity were lower, suggesting a simplified canopy surface in alternative states, with scattered emergent overstory trees, and decreased vertical differentiation of strata. Moreover, the LiDAR-derived leaf area index and light penetration index indicated a more open environment than reference states. Our findings suggest short-interval wildfires drive widespread and persistent homogenisation of forest structure, potentially degrading ecosystem functions that support biodiversity and ecosystem services.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.