Developing a new sustainable rating system for assessing construction projects using BWM

IF 5.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Mahmoud Alsharkawy , Ahmed Hamdy , Mohamed Marzouk
{"title":"Developing a new sustainable rating system for assessing construction projects using BWM","authors":"Mahmoud Alsharkawy ,&nbsp;Ahmed Hamdy ,&nbsp;Mohamed Marzouk","doi":"10.1016/j.clet.2025.100920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research presents a methodology for assessing the contractor's abidance towards preserving the environment during the construction phase. This goal is achieved by the indication of the most prevalent factors. Based on a thorough literature review and experts' review, a list of forty factors is presented, which are grouped into nine categories. These categories are: Solid Waste Management; Water Management; Energy Efficiency; Pollutants Control; Traffic Management; Site Arrangement; Procurement; Awareness Leverage &amp; Education; and Social Governance. Firstly, a two-step questionnaire survey is conducted in this research to review and assess the factors list extracted from the literature review. Upon completing the questionnaire survey, statistical analysis is applied, including the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test, Exploratory Factors Analysis (EFA), and the Cronbach's Alpha test for reliability, resulting in thirty-two final factors list after eliminating eight factors. Using the weights calculated by the Best-Worst Method (BWM) and the assessment benchmarks set for each factor, the environmental scoring sheet is generated along with the overall scoring evaluation thresholds to indicate the holistic environmental performance grade. Finally, the application of the proposed research methodology is presented by applying the scoring tool through a case study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34618,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100920"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790825000436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research presents a methodology for assessing the contractor's abidance towards preserving the environment during the construction phase. This goal is achieved by the indication of the most prevalent factors. Based on a thorough literature review and experts' review, a list of forty factors is presented, which are grouped into nine categories. These categories are: Solid Waste Management; Water Management; Energy Efficiency; Pollutants Control; Traffic Management; Site Arrangement; Procurement; Awareness Leverage & Education; and Social Governance. Firstly, a two-step questionnaire survey is conducted in this research to review and assess the factors list extracted from the literature review. Upon completing the questionnaire survey, statistical analysis is applied, including the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test, Exploratory Factors Analysis (EFA), and the Cronbach's Alpha test for reliability, resulting in thirty-two final factors list after eliminating eight factors. Using the weights calculated by the Best-Worst Method (BWM) and the assessment benchmarks set for each factor, the environmental scoring sheet is generated along with the overall scoring evaluation thresholds to indicate the holistic environmental performance grade. Finally, the application of the proposed research methodology is presented by applying the scoring tool through a case study.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleaner Engineering and Technology
Cleaner Engineering and Technology Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信