Mechanism of land trusteeship promoting farmers’ collective action: A study based on social–ecological systems framework

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Yiqing Su , Qiaoyuan Huang , Quanfeng Shu , Yahua Wang , Xiaoxing Qi
{"title":"Mechanism of land trusteeship promoting farmers’ collective action: A study based on social–ecological systems framework","authors":"Yiqing Su ,&nbsp;Qiaoyuan Huang ,&nbsp;Quanfeng Shu ,&nbsp;Yahua Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaoxing Qi","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Enhancing farmers' collective action amid ongoing transformations in land management practices is crucial for achieving rural revitalization. In this study, a social–ecological system analytical framework is constructed to examine the mechanisms through which land trusteeship influences the collective action of farmers in the Chinese context. Land trusteeship was found to encompass three processes of socialization of farmland use, management process, and output, reflecting a broader concept of socialized farmland operation. By using survey data collected in 2023, from 1809 households across 122 villages in 19 Chinese provinces, ordered probit regression, instrumental variable methods, restricted cubic spline regression, and mediation effect models were employed. The findings indicate that: (1) Land trusteeship significantly and positively impacts farmers' collective action. (2) Increasing the scale of land trusteeship does not constrain farmers’ collective action, and results are consistent across various models, samples, and dependent variables. (3) Land trusteeship promotes collective action by enhancing village leadership and fostering the development of cooperative organizations. These findings provide a new perspective on collective action related to land management practices and offer theoretical insights for agricultural transition economies seeking to advance agricultural modernization. Future innovations in land trusteeship should focus on accelerating technological upgrades, optimizing agricultural production conditions, and implementing policy measures to guide diverse stakeholders, including farmers, village leaders, and market entities, to collaborate in rural governance and development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 103622"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725000622","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enhancing farmers' collective action amid ongoing transformations in land management practices is crucial for achieving rural revitalization. In this study, a social–ecological system analytical framework is constructed to examine the mechanisms through which land trusteeship influences the collective action of farmers in the Chinese context. Land trusteeship was found to encompass three processes of socialization of farmland use, management process, and output, reflecting a broader concept of socialized farmland operation. By using survey data collected in 2023, from 1809 households across 122 villages in 19 Chinese provinces, ordered probit regression, instrumental variable methods, restricted cubic spline regression, and mediation effect models were employed. The findings indicate that: (1) Land trusteeship significantly and positively impacts farmers' collective action. (2) Increasing the scale of land trusteeship does not constrain farmers’ collective action, and results are consistent across various models, samples, and dependent variables. (3) Land trusteeship promotes collective action by enhancing village leadership and fostering the development of cooperative organizations. These findings provide a new perspective on collective action related to land management practices and offer theoretical insights for agricultural transition economies seeking to advance agricultural modernization. Future innovations in land trusteeship should focus on accelerating technological upgrades, optimizing agricultural production conditions, and implementing policy measures to guide diverse stakeholders, including farmers, village leaders, and market entities, to collaborate in rural governance and development.

Abstract Image

土地托管促进农民集体行动的机制:基于社会生态系统框架的研究
在土地管理实践不断变革的背景下,加强农民集体行动对实现乡村振兴至关重要。本研究构建社会生态系统分析框架,考察中国土地托管制度对农民集体行动的影响机制。研究发现,土地托管包含农地使用社会化、管理社会化和产出社会化三个过程,反映了更广泛的农地社会化经营概念。利用2023年中国19个省122个村1809户调查数据,采用有序probit回归、工具变量法、限制三次样条回归和中介效应模型。研究结果表明:(1)土地托管制度显著正向影响农民集体行动。(2)增加土地托管规模并不会约束农民的集体行动,且结果在不同模型、样本和因变量之间是一致的。(3)土地托管制度通过加强村庄领导和促进合作组织的发展,促进集体行动。这些发现为研究与土地管理实践相关的集体行动提供了新的视角,并为寻求推进农业现代化的农业转型经济体提供了理论见解。未来土地托管的创新应着眼于加快技术升级,优化农业生产条件,实施政策措施,引导包括农民、村领导和市场主体在内的利益相关者在农村治理和发展中进行合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信