Printability prediction of food formulations for 3D printing using a Gaussian process regression model

IF 5.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Rubén Maldonado-Rosas , Mariel Alfaro-Ponce , Enrique Cuan-Urquizo , Viridiana Tejada-Ortigoza
{"title":"Printability prediction of food formulations for 3D printing using a Gaussian process regression model","authors":"Rubén Maldonado-Rosas ,&nbsp;Mariel Alfaro-Ponce ,&nbsp;Enrique Cuan-Urquizo ,&nbsp;Viridiana Tejada-Ortigoza","doi":"10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2025.112534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of the study was to address the research gap in printability prediction for nutritious formulations in Food 3D Printing. To this end, a predictive model to reduce trial-and-error operations was developed for formulation optimization. Printability characterization assessments were employed based on 2D and 3D tests to forecast the printability of formulations using a machine learning (ML) strategy. Starch concentration and printing temperature of formulations were used as predictors of printability. The predictive model was developed based on different feature extraction methods combined with Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) algorithms. In addition, a complementary laboratory validation was performed to determine a comparative percentage error between the GPR model predictions and the experimental measurements from an additional dataset. The GPR model was able to predict printability, reaching a RMSE value between 0.013 and 0.48%. Which means the model fit the data with accuracy, providing a reliable tool for formulation optimization. The laboratory validation demonstrated close values to those obtained by the model, further confirming its effectiveness. The comparative percentage errors from the laboratory validation varied between assessments and formulations, with percentage errors as low as 0.01%. The model, with its ability to predict the printability of formulations with different starch compositions and printing temperatures, could be a valuable tool in the food industry. It could assist in examining both the quality of 3D-printed structures and the adaptation of these formulations and printers for producing food products with customized sensory and nutritional profiles, opening up new possibilities for food production and customization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":359,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Engineering","volume":"395 ","pages":"Article 112534"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026087742500069X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to address the research gap in printability prediction for nutritious formulations in Food 3D Printing. To this end, a predictive model to reduce trial-and-error operations was developed for formulation optimization. Printability characterization assessments were employed based on 2D and 3D tests to forecast the printability of formulations using a machine learning (ML) strategy. Starch concentration and printing temperature of formulations were used as predictors of printability. The predictive model was developed based on different feature extraction methods combined with Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) algorithms. In addition, a complementary laboratory validation was performed to determine a comparative percentage error between the GPR model predictions and the experimental measurements from an additional dataset. The GPR model was able to predict printability, reaching a RMSE value between 0.013 and 0.48%. Which means the model fit the data with accuracy, providing a reliable tool for formulation optimization. The laboratory validation demonstrated close values to those obtained by the model, further confirming its effectiveness. The comparative percentage errors from the laboratory validation varied between assessments and formulations, with percentage errors as low as 0.01%. The model, with its ability to predict the printability of formulations with different starch compositions and printing temperatures, could be a valuable tool in the food industry. It could assist in examining both the quality of 3D-printed structures and the adaptation of these formulations and printers for producing food products with customized sensory and nutritional profiles, opening up new possibilities for food production and customization.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Engineering
Journal of Food Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
5.50%
发文量
275
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research and review papers on any subject at the interface between food and engineering, particularly those of relevance to industry, including: Engineering properties of foods, food physics and physical chemistry; processing, measurement, control, packaging, storage and distribution; engineering aspects of the design and production of novel foods and of food service and catering; design and operation of food processes, plant and equipment; economics of food engineering, including the economics of alternative processes. Accounts of food engineering achievements are of particular value.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信