Odour transfer in membrane energy exchangers for ventilation: An investigation on sensory perception and design implications

IF 7.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Peng Liu , Mathea Lie Tærum , Maria Justo Alonso , Anneli Halfvardsson , Hans Martin Mathisen
{"title":"Odour transfer in membrane energy exchangers for ventilation: An investigation on sensory perception and design implications","authors":"Peng Liu ,&nbsp;Mathea Lie Tærum ,&nbsp;Maria Justo Alonso ,&nbsp;Anneli Halfvardsson ,&nbsp;Hans Martin Mathisen","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Membrane energy exchangers (MEEs) are increasingly utilized for their ability to maintain adequate ventilation rates that ensure good indoor air quality in an energy efficient manner. Their capability to transfer moisture reduces humidity loads in hot, humid climates and prevents frost formation inside heat exchangers in cold climates. Nevertheless, odour transfer through semi-permeable membranes has been largely overlooked assuming negligible effect without robust scientific evidence. Recent studies have revealed that the commonly used tracer gas method for heat recovery systems is inadequate for assessing odour transfer in MEEs. This study developed three MEEs using additive manufacturing. While maintaining identical dimensions, the MEEs incorporated different membranes with distinct pore sizes and moisture transfer abilities. Untrained sensory panels, comprising 20–25 participants, assessed odour perception in a laboratory environment. Six representative odour sources commonly encountered in real-world scenarios, along with three blank controls, were evaluated. The results show that high-intensity odours, such as salami, posed significant challenges for all tested MEEs, with dissatisfaction rates ranging from 72 % to 95 %. MEE-1, with the highest humidity transfer resistance (143.3 s/m), demonstrated the best odour mitigation performance. The other two MEEs showed comparable sensory outcomes despite MEE-2′s higher humidity transfer resistance. No consistent correlation was identified between moisture transfer resistance and odour transfer resistance, indicating that odour selectivity cannot be reliably benchmarked based solely on moisture transfer properties. These findings highlight the need for further investigation into the factors influencing odour transfer and the importance of tailoring MEE designs for specific odour profiles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"274 ","pages":"Article 112795"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036013232500277X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Membrane energy exchangers (MEEs) are increasingly utilized for their ability to maintain adequate ventilation rates that ensure good indoor air quality in an energy efficient manner. Their capability to transfer moisture reduces humidity loads in hot, humid climates and prevents frost formation inside heat exchangers in cold climates. Nevertheless, odour transfer through semi-permeable membranes has been largely overlooked assuming negligible effect without robust scientific evidence. Recent studies have revealed that the commonly used tracer gas method for heat recovery systems is inadequate for assessing odour transfer in MEEs. This study developed three MEEs using additive manufacturing. While maintaining identical dimensions, the MEEs incorporated different membranes with distinct pore sizes and moisture transfer abilities. Untrained sensory panels, comprising 20–25 participants, assessed odour perception in a laboratory environment. Six representative odour sources commonly encountered in real-world scenarios, along with three blank controls, were evaluated. The results show that high-intensity odours, such as salami, posed significant challenges for all tested MEEs, with dissatisfaction rates ranging from 72 % to 95 %. MEE-1, with the highest humidity transfer resistance (143.3 s/m), demonstrated the best odour mitigation performance. The other two MEEs showed comparable sensory outcomes despite MEE-2′s higher humidity transfer resistance. No consistent correlation was identified between moisture transfer resistance and odour transfer resistance, indicating that odour selectivity cannot be reliably benchmarked based solely on moisture transfer properties. These findings highlight the need for further investigation into the factors influencing odour transfer and the importance of tailoring MEE designs for specific odour profiles.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Building and Environment
Building and Environment 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
23.00%
发文量
1130
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信