LC-DAD: A tool from the past to identify isomers of new psychoactives substances. Application to chloromethcathinones

IF 1.8 Q4 TOXICOLOGY
Pauline Baradian , Camille Chatenay , Guillaume Hoizey , Laurent Fanton , Charline Bottinelli
{"title":"LC-DAD: A tool from the past to identify isomers of new psychoactives substances. Application to chloromethcathinones","authors":"Pauline Baradian ,&nbsp;Camille Chatenay ,&nbsp;Guillaume Hoizey ,&nbsp;Laurent Fanton ,&nbsp;Charline Bottinelli","doi":"10.1016/j.toxac.2025.01.068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To formally identify the isomers of chloromethcathinone (x-CMC).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>General toxicological unknown screening performed on peripheral blood of a man found dead at home in a context of chemsex revealed x-CMC on gas chromatography (GC) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) using the Cayman commercial library. To formally identify the isomer, commercial standards of 3-CMC and 4-CMC were obtained and integrated in homemade spectrum libraries (mass and UV) by analyzing them using screening methods: GC-MS (after acetylation) and liquid chromatography (LC) coupled to diode array detection incremented to a mass spectrometer (DAD/MS), plus targeted methods dedicated to new psychoactive substances (NPSs) by tandem mass spectrometry: GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS. These methods are in daily use in laboratories in forensic contexts (determination of cause of death, drug abuse). Apolar columns were used for all methods. The conditions of the various methods have been previously published (Bottinelli, Toxac, 2017,29,123–129; Epain, Int Legal Med, 2024, 138, 1813–1820).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Whatever the MS method and whether the compound was acetylated or not (GC), an identical spectrum was observed for 3-CMC and 4-CMC. The specific m/z ions selected for GC-MS were 111, 139 and 239. For GC-MS/MS, the transitions were 138.9<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->110.9, 138.9<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->75.0 and 112.9<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->75.0, and for LC-MS/MS 197.9<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->145.0 and 197.9<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->180.0. Under the chromatographic conditions tested, an identical retention time (RT) was observed for the two isomers using GC-MS and GC-MS/MS, making them completely indistinguishable, despite many temperature gradient tests. However, the LC methods obtained distinct RTs: 3.73<!--> <!-->min and 3.52<!--> <!-->min for 3-CMC and 4-CMC, respectively, on LC-MS/MS. As well as being discriminated by RT, 3-CMC (6.32<!--> <!-->min) and 4-CMC (6.54<!--> <!-->min) were clearly distinguishable on LC-DAD/MS by their absorption spectra. Absorbance maxima were observed at wavelengths of 210 and 250<!--> <!-->nm for 3-CMC and 197 and 262<!--> <!-->nm for 4-CMC. Concerning isomer identification in the postmortem case described here, 3-CMC was formally identified by LC-DAD/MS and then quantified (33.7 ng/mL) in the peripheral blood by LC-MS/MS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In some cases, it is difficult to distinguish NPS isomers. It is generally expected that compounds with similar structures will react similarly under given analytic conditions. Therefore, it was initially suspected that the x-CMC isomers would behave identically to the x-MMC isomers: i.e., differentiable by RT on GC and undistinguishable on LC-MS/MS. The difference in these structures lies in the presence of a chlorine atom (CMC) replacing a methyl group (MMC). On LC, a chloride group allows additional interaction with the stationary phase, and thus facilitates isomer separation. On GC, the position of a chloride group, which has a higher molar mass than a methyl group, has less influence on isomer separation. In the absence of commercial standards, the LC-DAD/MS method alone made it possible to formally distinguish CMC isomers by their UV spectrum, as previously demonstrated for MMC isomers (Bottinelli, Toxac, 2017, 29, 123–129). In first-line analysis in toxicological unknown screening, LC-DAD/MS allowed immediate distinction in the cases analyzed. Quantification could be carried out secondarily using a specific LC-MS/MS method with greater sensitivity and accurate reproducible quantification. In 2023, six cases of 3-CMC, and no cases of 4-CMC, were identified in the laboratory, all in contexts of chemsex.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23170,"journal":{"name":"Toxicologie Analytique et Clinique","volume":"37 1","pages":"Page S45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicologie Analytique et Clinique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235200782500068X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To formally identify the isomers of chloromethcathinone (x-CMC).

Method

General toxicological unknown screening performed on peripheral blood of a man found dead at home in a context of chemsex revealed x-CMC on gas chromatography (GC) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) using the Cayman commercial library. To formally identify the isomer, commercial standards of 3-CMC and 4-CMC were obtained and integrated in homemade spectrum libraries (mass and UV) by analyzing them using screening methods: GC-MS (after acetylation) and liquid chromatography (LC) coupled to diode array detection incremented to a mass spectrometer (DAD/MS), plus targeted methods dedicated to new psychoactive substances (NPSs) by tandem mass spectrometry: GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS. These methods are in daily use in laboratories in forensic contexts (determination of cause of death, drug abuse). Apolar columns were used for all methods. The conditions of the various methods have been previously published (Bottinelli, Toxac, 2017,29,123–129; Epain, Int Legal Med, 2024, 138, 1813–1820).

Results

Whatever the MS method and whether the compound was acetylated or not (GC), an identical spectrum was observed for 3-CMC and 4-CMC. The specific m/z ions selected for GC-MS were 111, 139 and 239. For GC-MS/MS, the transitions were 138.9 > 110.9, 138.9 > 75.0 and 112.9 > 75.0, and for LC-MS/MS 197.9 > 145.0 and 197.9 > 180.0. Under the chromatographic conditions tested, an identical retention time (RT) was observed for the two isomers using GC-MS and GC-MS/MS, making them completely indistinguishable, despite many temperature gradient tests. However, the LC methods obtained distinct RTs: 3.73 min and 3.52 min for 3-CMC and 4-CMC, respectively, on LC-MS/MS. As well as being discriminated by RT, 3-CMC (6.32 min) and 4-CMC (6.54 min) were clearly distinguishable on LC-DAD/MS by their absorption spectra. Absorbance maxima were observed at wavelengths of 210 and 250 nm for 3-CMC and 197 and 262 nm for 4-CMC. Concerning isomer identification in the postmortem case described here, 3-CMC was formally identified by LC-DAD/MS and then quantified (33.7 ng/mL) in the peripheral blood by LC-MS/MS.

Conclusion

In some cases, it is difficult to distinguish NPS isomers. It is generally expected that compounds with similar structures will react similarly under given analytic conditions. Therefore, it was initially suspected that the x-CMC isomers would behave identically to the x-MMC isomers: i.e., differentiable by RT on GC and undistinguishable on LC-MS/MS. The difference in these structures lies in the presence of a chlorine atom (CMC) replacing a methyl group (MMC). On LC, a chloride group allows additional interaction with the stationary phase, and thus facilitates isomer separation. On GC, the position of a chloride group, which has a higher molar mass than a methyl group, has less influence on isomer separation. In the absence of commercial standards, the LC-DAD/MS method alone made it possible to formally distinguish CMC isomers by their UV spectrum, as previously demonstrated for MMC isomers (Bottinelli, Toxac, 2017, 29, 123–129). In first-line analysis in toxicological unknown screening, LC-DAD/MS allowed immediate distinction in the cases analyzed. Quantification could be carried out secondarily using a specific LC-MS/MS method with greater sensitivity and accurate reproducible quantification. In 2023, six cases of 3-CMC, and no cases of 4-CMC, were identified in the laboratory, all in contexts of chemsex.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
33.30%
发文量
393
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信