Carbon reduction and co-benefits through nature-based solution at a large petrochemical contaminated site in Beijing: Policy implications for China

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Xiaoyan Li, Shijie Wang, Maosheng Zhong, Lin Jiang, Wenyu Zhang, Jihong Li
{"title":"Carbon reduction and co-benefits through nature-based solution at a large petrochemical contaminated site in Beijing: Policy implications for China","authors":"Xiaoyan Li, Shijie Wang, Maosheng Zhong, Lin Jiang, Wenyu Zhang, Jihong Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The contaminated land remediation industry in China has experienced explosive growth in recent years. However, traditional remediation strategies that typically require high energy and resource inputs are faced with major challenges under China’s 2060 carbon neutrality goal. Here, we provide an environmental sustainability assessment of the remediation of a large petrochemical site, particularly from carbon emissions, using life cycle assessment and calculation of the net ecosystem carbon budget; the results showed that the two traditional remediation strategies had carbon emissions of 6.08 × 10<sup>8</sup> and 1.10 × 10<sup>8</sup> kg CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent (CO<sub>2</sub> eq) respectively, and nature-based solution (NbS) reduced carbon emissions to 1.80×10<sup>6</sup> kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq, corresponding to 99.8% and 98.6% reductions, respectively. Furthermore, if considering the remediation of a total of 302 petrochemical facilities in China, the estimated carbon emissions were 5.53×10<sup>11</sup> and 9.99×10<sup>10</sup> kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq based on the two traditional remediation strategies; however, net carbon storage in the NbS could be up to 5.58 × 10<sup>8</sup> kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq if only 30% of the petrochemical-contaminated sites would adopt NbS strategies. Finally, challenges for adopting NbS strategies in China are discussed, and sustainable remediation framework and policy recommendation for implementing NbS are suggested. Our findings not only underscore the feasibility and effectiveness of NbS strategies but also provide valuable insights for sustainable management of contaminated sites in China.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145172","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The contaminated land remediation industry in China has experienced explosive growth in recent years. However, traditional remediation strategies that typically require high energy and resource inputs are faced with major challenges under China’s 2060 carbon neutrality goal. Here, we provide an environmental sustainability assessment of the remediation of a large petrochemical site, particularly from carbon emissions, using life cycle assessment and calculation of the net ecosystem carbon budget; the results showed that the two traditional remediation strategies had carbon emissions of 6.08 × 108 and 1.10 × 108 kg CO2 equivalent (CO2 eq) respectively, and nature-based solution (NbS) reduced carbon emissions to 1.80×106 kg CO2 eq, corresponding to 99.8% and 98.6% reductions, respectively. Furthermore, if considering the remediation of a total of 302 petrochemical facilities in China, the estimated carbon emissions were 5.53×1011 and 9.99×1010 kg CO2 eq based on the two traditional remediation strategies; however, net carbon storage in the NbS could be up to 5.58 × 108 kg CO2 eq if only 30% of the petrochemical-contaminated sites would adopt NbS strategies. Finally, challenges for adopting NbS strategies in China are discussed, and sustainable remediation framework and policy recommendation for implementing NbS are suggested. Our findings not only underscore the feasibility and effectiveness of NbS strategies but also provide valuable insights for sustainable management of contaminated sites in China.

Abstract Image

近年来,中国的污染土地修复行业经历了爆炸式增长。然而,在中国 2060 年实现碳中和的目标下,通常需要高能耗和高资源投入的传统修复策略面临着重大挑战。在此,我们采用生命周期评估和计算生态系统净碳预算的方法,对一个大型石化基地的修复进行了环境可持续性评估,特别是从碳排放方面进行了评估;结果表明,两种传统修复策略的碳排放量分别为 6.08×108 和 1.10×108 千克二氧化碳当量(CO2 eq),而基于自然的解决方案(NbS)可将碳排放量降至 1.80×106 千克二氧化碳当量,分别减少了 99.8%和 98.6%。此外,如果考虑到中国总共 302 个石化设施的修复,基于两种传统修复策略的碳排放量估计分别为 5.53×1011 和 9.99×1010 kg CO2 eq;然而,如果只有 30% 的石化污染场地采用 NbS 策略,则 NbS 的净碳储存量可达 5.58 × 108 kg CO2 eq。最后,讨论了在中国采用 NbS 策略所面临的挑战,并提出了实施 NbS 的可持续修复框架和政策建议。我们的研究结果不仅证明了 NbS 策略的可行性和有效性,还为中国污染场地的可持续管理提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信