Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone in Type 2 Diabetes: A Pooled Analysis of Trials of Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease.

IF 16.6
Diabetes care Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.2337/dc24-1873
John W Ostrominski, Brian L Claggett, Zi Michael Miao, Gerasimos Filippatos, Akshay S Desai, Pardeep S Jhund, Alasdair Henderson, Meike Brinker, Patrick Schloemer, Prabhakar Viswanathan, Andrea Lage, Katja Rohwedder, Carolyn S P Lam, Michele Senni, Sanjiv J Shah, Adriaan A Voors, Faiez Zannad, Peter Rossing, Luis M Ruilope, Stefan D Anker, Bertram Pitt, Rajiv Agarwal, John J V McMurray, Scott D Solomon, Muthiah Vaduganathan
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone in Type 2 Diabetes: A Pooled Analysis of Trials of Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease.","authors":"John W Ostrominski, Brian L Claggett, Zi Michael Miao, Gerasimos Filippatos, Akshay S Desai, Pardeep S Jhund, Alasdair Henderson, Meike Brinker, Patrick Schloemer, Prabhakar Viswanathan, Andrea Lage, Katja Rohwedder, Carolyn S P Lam, Michele Senni, Sanjiv J Shah, Adriaan A Voors, Faiez Zannad, Peter Rossing, Luis M Ruilope, Stefan D Anker, Bertram Pitt, Rajiv Agarwal, John J V McMurray, Scott D Solomon, Muthiah Vaduganathan","doi":"10.2337/dc24-1873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of finerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and either chronic kidney disease (CKD) or heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In this prespecified participant-level pooled analysis of all phase III clinical trials evaluating finerenone versus placebo conducted to date (FINE-HEART), the safety and efficacy of finerenone was evaluated among participants with a history of T2D. Treatment effects on the primary outcome of cardiovascular death and other secondary outcomes were evaluated according to baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and glucose-lowering therapy (GLT) regimen using stratified Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 18,991 FINE-HEART participants, 15,365 (80.9%) had T2D and available HbA1c at baseline (mean age, 66 ± 10 years; 32% women; mean HbA1c, 7.6 ± 1.4%). The most common GLT regimens were insulin alone (n = 2,652), insulin and metformin (n = 2,005), metformin alone (n = 1,616), metformin and sulfonylurea (n = 1,039), and \"other\" (n = 8,117), including sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA). Over a median follow-up of 2.9 years, treatment effects of finerenone versus placebo on cardiovascular death were consistent across baseline HbA1c (Pinteraction = 0.75) and GLT regimen (Pinteraction = 0.46). Finerenone consistently reduced the kidney composite outcome, HF hospitalization, major adverse cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality, irrespective of baseline HbA1c and GLT regimen. Treatment effects of finerenone were also consistent across number of background GLTs and irrespective of concomitant treatment with a SGLT2i or GLP-1RA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Finerenone consistently reduced morbidity and mortality in individuals with T2D across a broad range of glycemia and glucose-lowering regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":"745-755"},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-1873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of finerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and either chronic kidney disease (CKD) or heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

Research design and methods: In this prespecified participant-level pooled analysis of all phase III clinical trials evaluating finerenone versus placebo conducted to date (FINE-HEART), the safety and efficacy of finerenone was evaluated among participants with a history of T2D. Treatment effects on the primary outcome of cardiovascular death and other secondary outcomes were evaluated according to baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and glucose-lowering therapy (GLT) regimen using stratified Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: Of 18,991 FINE-HEART participants, 15,365 (80.9%) had T2D and available HbA1c at baseline (mean age, 66 ± 10 years; 32% women; mean HbA1c, 7.6 ± 1.4%). The most common GLT regimens were insulin alone (n = 2,652), insulin and metformin (n = 2,005), metformin alone (n = 1,616), metformin and sulfonylurea (n = 1,039), and "other" (n = 8,117), including sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA). Over a median follow-up of 2.9 years, treatment effects of finerenone versus placebo on cardiovascular death were consistent across baseline HbA1c (Pinteraction = 0.75) and GLT regimen (Pinteraction = 0.46). Finerenone consistently reduced the kidney composite outcome, HF hospitalization, major adverse cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality, irrespective of baseline HbA1c and GLT regimen. Treatment effects of finerenone were also consistent across number of background GLTs and irrespective of concomitant treatment with a SGLT2i or GLP-1RA.

Conclusions: Finerenone consistently reduced morbidity and mortality in individuals with T2D across a broad range of glycemia and glucose-lowering regimens.

芬尼酮治疗2型糖尿病的疗效和安全性:一项心力衰竭和慢性肾脏疾病试验的汇总分析
目的:评价非甾体矿物皮质激素受体拮抗剂芬尼酮在2型糖尿病(T2D)、慢性肾病(CKD)或心力衰竭(HF)伴轻度射血分数降低(HFmrEF)或保留射血分数(HFpEF)患者中的疗效和安全性。研究设计和方法:在这项预先指定的参与者水平的汇总分析中,对迄今为止进行的所有评估芬尼酮与安慰剂的III期临床试验(FINE-HEART)进行了评估,芬尼酮的安全性和有效性在有T2D病史的参与者中进行了评估。根据基线糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和降糖治疗(GLT)方案,使用分层Cox比例风险模型评估治疗对心血管死亡主要结局和其他次要结局的影响。结果:在18991名FINE-HEART参与者中,15365名(80.9%)在基线时患有T2D和可用HbA1c(平均年龄66±10岁;32%的女性;平均HbA1c, 7.6±1.4%)。最常见的GLT方案是单独使用胰岛素(n = 2652),胰岛素和二甲双胍(n = 2005),单用二甲双胍(n = 1616),二甲双胍和磺脲类(n = 1039),以及“其他”(n = 8117),包括钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)和胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)。在中位随访2.9年期间,芬尼酮与安慰剂对心血管死亡的治疗效果在基线HbA1c (p相互作用= 0.75)和GLT方案(p相互作用= 0.46)中是一致的。无论基线HbA1c和GLT方案如何,芬尼酮均可降低肾脏综合预后、HF住院、主要不良心血管事件和全因死亡率。芬烯酮的治疗效果在背景glt的数量上也是一致的,与SGLT2i或GLP-1RA的联合治疗无关。结论:芬尼酮在广泛的降糖和降糖方案中持续降低T2D患者的发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信