Effects of pedestal-mounted electric fans on self-reported symptoms and mood-state in older adults exposed to indoor overheating during a simulated heatwave: an exploratory analysis.

Fergus K O'Connor, Gregory W McGarr, Roberto C Harris-Mostert, Pierre Boulay, Ronald J Sigal, Robert D Meade, Glen P Kenny
{"title":"Effects of pedestal-mounted electric fans on self-reported symptoms and mood-state in older adults exposed to indoor overheating during a simulated heatwave: an exploratory analysis.","authors":"Fergus K O'Connor, Gregory W McGarr, Roberto C Harris-Mostert, Pierre Boulay, Ronald J Sigal, Robert D Meade, Glen P Kenny","doi":"10.1139/apnm-2024-0461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent evidence from modelling and laboratory-based studies showed that electric fans are ineffective at meaningfully lowering core temperature in older adults at air temperatures of 36 °C. However, their influence on self-reported environmental symptoms and mood-state during daylong use in hot indoor environments remains unclear. Eighteen older adults (8 females, median (interquartile range); 72 (67-76 years)) completed three randomized 8 h heat exposures (36 °C, 45% relative humidity) with a fan generating air speeds of 0 (no fan, control), 2, or 4 m/s at the front of the body positioned 1 m away. Participants were seated throughout, except for 4 × 10 min periods of simulated activities of daily living (stepping (∼2.25 metabolic equivalents (METs)). Core temperature, mean skin temperature, and heart rate areas under the curve (AUCs, hours 0-8) were calculated to assess cumulative physiological strain. Total Symptom Scores (68-item Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire) as well as Total Mood Disturbance and Energy Index (40-item Profile of Mood States questionnaire) were evaluated at end-heating (adjusted for pre-exposure). Core temperature, mean skin temperatures, and heart rate AUCs were not different between conditions (all <i>p</i> ≥ 0.087). Total Symptom Scores were 0.89-fold [0.81, 0.97] lower with fan use (combined across speeds) compared to no fan (<i>p</i> = 0.009). Energy Index scores were 2.4 points [0.8, 4.0] higher with fan use compared to no fan (<i>p</i> = 0.004). However, mood disturbance was not significantly different between conditions (<i>p</i> = 0.345). Our exploratory analysis show that fans can reduce self-reported symptoms and increase perceived energy levels in older adults in overheated indoor environments, despite no meaningful attenuation of physiological strain. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05695079.</p>","PeriodicalId":93878,"journal":{"name":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2024-0461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent evidence from modelling and laboratory-based studies showed that electric fans are ineffective at meaningfully lowering core temperature in older adults at air temperatures of 36 °C. However, their influence on self-reported environmental symptoms and mood-state during daylong use in hot indoor environments remains unclear. Eighteen older adults (8 females, median (interquartile range); 72 (67-76 years)) completed three randomized 8 h heat exposures (36 °C, 45% relative humidity) with a fan generating air speeds of 0 (no fan, control), 2, or 4 m/s at the front of the body positioned 1 m away. Participants were seated throughout, except for 4 × 10 min periods of simulated activities of daily living (stepping (∼2.25 metabolic equivalents (METs)). Core temperature, mean skin temperature, and heart rate areas under the curve (AUCs, hours 0-8) were calculated to assess cumulative physiological strain. Total Symptom Scores (68-item Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire) as well as Total Mood Disturbance and Energy Index (40-item Profile of Mood States questionnaire) were evaluated at end-heating (adjusted for pre-exposure). Core temperature, mean skin temperatures, and heart rate AUCs were not different between conditions (all p ≥ 0.087). Total Symptom Scores were 0.89-fold [0.81, 0.97] lower with fan use (combined across speeds) compared to no fan (p = 0.009). Energy Index scores were 2.4 points [0.8, 4.0] higher with fan use compared to no fan (p = 0.004). However, mood disturbance was not significantly different between conditions (p = 0.345). Our exploratory analysis show that fans can reduce self-reported symptoms and increase perceived energy levels in older adults in overheated indoor environments, despite no meaningful attenuation of physiological strain. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05695079.

在模拟热浪期间暴露于室内过热的老年人,安装在基座上的电风扇对自我报告症状和情绪状态的影响:一项探索性分析。
最近来自模型和实验室研究的证据表明,在36°C的气温下,电风扇对降低老年人的核心温度无效。然而,在炎热的室内环境中,它们对自我报告的环境症状和情绪状态的影响尚不清楚。18名老年人(8名女性,中位数[四分位数范围];72[67-76岁])完成了三次随机的8小时热暴露(36°C, 45%相对湿度),风扇产生的风速为0(无风扇,对照组),2和4米/秒,位于身体前方1m处。除了4 x 10分钟的模拟日常生活活动(步行[~2.25 METs])外,参与者自始至终都是坐着的。计算核心温度、平均皮肤温度和心率曲线下面积(AUC,小时0-8)来评估累积生理应变。在加热结束时评估总症状得分(68项环境症状问卷)以及总情绪障碍和能量指数(40项情绪状态问卷)(根据暴露前进行调整)。各组核心温度、平均皮肤温度和心率auc无显著差异(P均≥0.087)。与不使用风扇相比,使用风扇(跨速度综合)的总症状评分低0.89倍[0.81,0.97](P=0.009)。与不使用风扇相比,使用风扇的能量指数得分高出2.4分[0.8,4.0](P=0.004)。两组间情绪障碍差异无统计学意义(P=0.345)。我们的探索性分析表明,在过热的室内环境中,风扇可以减少老年人自我报告的症状,增加感知的能量水平,尽管生理压力没有明显的衰减。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信