The Evolution of Medicare: Challenges, Responses, and Prospects.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sherry Glied, Richard Frank, Brendan Lui
{"title":"The Evolution of Medicare: Challenges, Responses, and Prospects.","authors":"Sherry Glied, Richard Frank, Brendan Lui","doi":"10.1215/03616878-11830274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Medicare program has provided a near-universal source of health care coverage for America's elderly since 1965. Over its 60-year history, the program has evolved to cover a greater share of the population and pay for an increasing share of the nation's health care bills. As Medicare has grown, so too have its challenges. The traditional Medicare program has failed to keep pace with a rapidly changing health care sector and demographic shifts. Constrained by its own benefit design, Medicare has allowed privately-contracted health plans (Medigap, Medicare Advantage) to provide much needed yet inadequate remedies to the program's shortcomings. After briefly recounting Medicare's origins, we discuss how the program's founding statutes have hindered its ability to respond to new and growing challenges along the dimensions of cost-sharing, cost containment, and benefit design. We then propose a three-pronged approach to reforming Medicare's benefit structure. We argue that a simplified enrollment process, a single benefit that brings together the program's constituent parts (Part A, Part B, and Part D), and a new organizational structure for care delivery based on the program's experience with Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), will together create a robust foundation that can sustain the Medicare program into the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-11830274","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Medicare program has provided a near-universal source of health care coverage for America's elderly since 1965. Over its 60-year history, the program has evolved to cover a greater share of the population and pay for an increasing share of the nation's health care bills. As Medicare has grown, so too have its challenges. The traditional Medicare program has failed to keep pace with a rapidly changing health care sector and demographic shifts. Constrained by its own benefit design, Medicare has allowed privately-contracted health plans (Medigap, Medicare Advantage) to provide much needed yet inadequate remedies to the program's shortcomings. After briefly recounting Medicare's origins, we discuss how the program's founding statutes have hindered its ability to respond to new and growing challenges along the dimensions of cost-sharing, cost containment, and benefit design. We then propose a three-pronged approach to reforming Medicare's benefit structure. We argue that a simplified enrollment process, a single benefit that brings together the program's constituent parts (Part A, Part B, and Part D), and a new organizational structure for care delivery based on the program's experience with Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), will together create a robust foundation that can sustain the Medicare program into the future.

医疗保险的演变:挑战、反应和前景。
自1965年以来,医疗保险计划为美国老年人提供了近乎普遍的医疗保险。在其60年的历史中,该计划已经发展到覆盖更大比例的人口,并支付越来越多的国家医疗保健费用。随着医疗保险的发展,它面临的挑战也在增加。传统的医疗保险计划已经无法跟上快速变化的医疗保健部门和人口变化的步伐。受自身福利设计的限制,联邦医疗保险允许私人签约的健康计划(Medigap, Medicare Advantage)为该计划的缺陷提供急需但不足的补救措施。在简要叙述了医疗保险的起源之后,我们讨论了该计划的创始法规如何阻碍了它在成本分担、成本控制和福利设计方面应对新的和日益增长的挑战的能力。然后,我们提出了一个三管齐下的方法来改革医疗保险的福利结构。我们认为,简化的登记流程,将项目组成部分(a部分、B部分和D部分)整合在一起的单一福利,以及基于项目与负责任的医疗机构(ACOs)合作经验的新的医疗服务组织结构,将共同创造一个坚实的基础,使医疗保险项目能够持续到未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A leading journal in its field, and the primary source of communication across the many disciplines it serves, the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law focuses on the initiation, formulation, and implementation of health policy and analyzes the relations between government and health—past, present, and future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信