Medicare in Treacherous Markets: From Community Bake Sales to Private Equity.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
James A Morone
{"title":"Medicare in Treacherous Markets: From Community Bake Sales to Private Equity.","authors":"James A Morone","doi":"10.1215/03616878-11825378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medicare's 60th birthday marks a shocking milestone for social democrats: More than half of all beneficiaries are signed up with private insurance plans that routinely deny payments. This paper flips the focus from the government program itself to the broader health care markets in which Medicare operates. I show how Medicare has lived through four very different health market eras. Each involves new kinds of medical institutions, new financial logics, and new thinking about what markets are and what role they ought to play in the program. First, during the long battle over Medicare, government programs and markets were (quite mistakenly) viewed as simple opposites. Second, in the 1970s, a new view emerged: Competition between HMOs would provide enrollees choice of providers, enhancing quality and lowering costs. Third, in the 1980s, Republicans pressed market choices into Medicare - drawing on rhetorical images from a bygone era; as conservatives were imagining medical markets, corporations arrived, asserted vast controls over medicine, and redirected consumer choice itself -- from selecting health providers to picking between insurance plans. Finally, beginning in the 2000s, private equity poured into health care and, once again, transformed the market. By Medicare's 60th birthday, enrollees found themselves in turbulent new era as health care in America was growing increasingly monetized.</p>","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-11825378","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medicare's 60th birthday marks a shocking milestone for social democrats: More than half of all beneficiaries are signed up with private insurance plans that routinely deny payments. This paper flips the focus from the government program itself to the broader health care markets in which Medicare operates. I show how Medicare has lived through four very different health market eras. Each involves new kinds of medical institutions, new financial logics, and new thinking about what markets are and what role they ought to play in the program. First, during the long battle over Medicare, government programs and markets were (quite mistakenly) viewed as simple opposites. Second, in the 1970s, a new view emerged: Competition between HMOs would provide enrollees choice of providers, enhancing quality and lowering costs. Third, in the 1980s, Republicans pressed market choices into Medicare - drawing on rhetorical images from a bygone era; as conservatives were imagining medical markets, corporations arrived, asserted vast controls over medicine, and redirected consumer choice itself -- from selecting health providers to picking between insurance plans. Finally, beginning in the 2000s, private equity poured into health care and, once again, transformed the market. By Medicare's 60th birthday, enrollees found themselves in turbulent new era as health care in America was growing increasingly monetized.

险恶市场中的医疗保险:从社区烘焙销售到私募股权。
医疗保险60岁生日对社会民主党来说是一个令人震惊的里程碑:超过一半的受益人签署了经常拒绝付款的私人保险计划。本文将重点从政府计划本身转向医疗保险运作的更广泛的医疗保健市场。我展示了医疗保险制度是如何经历了四个截然不同的医疗市场时代的。每一个都涉及到新型的医疗机构,新的金融逻辑,以及对市场是什么以及市场在计划中应该扮演什么角色的新思考。首先,在关于联邦医疗保险(Medicare)的长期斗争中,政府项目和市场被(相当错误地)视为简单的对立面。第二,在20世纪70年代,出现了一种新的观点:hmo之间的竞争将为参保者提供服务提供者的选择,提高质量并降低成本。第三,在上世纪80年代,共和党人利用过去时代的修辞形象,将市场选择强加于联邦医疗保险(Medicare);就在保守派想象医疗市场的时候,企业来了,对药品实行了广泛的控制,并重新引导了消费者的选择——从选择医疗服务提供者到选择保险计划。最后,从21世纪初开始,私募股权开始涌入医疗保健领域,并再次改变了这个市场。到联邦医疗保险60岁生日时,参保者发现自己正处于动荡的新时代,因为美国的医疗保健越来越商业化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A leading journal in its field, and the primary source of communication across the many disciplines it serves, the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law focuses on the initiation, formulation, and implementation of health policy and analyzes the relations between government and health—past, present, and future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信