Treatment failure in osteoporosis: who will experience a new Fracture? TAILOR a retrospective study

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Ilaria Buondonno, Marco Di Stefano, Patrizia D’Amelio
{"title":"Treatment failure in osteoporosis: who will experience a new Fracture? TAILOR a retrospective study","authors":"Ilaria Buondonno,&nbsp;Marco Di Stefano,&nbsp;Patrizia D’Amelio","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-02972-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Osteoporosis treatments reduce fracture risk but cannot fully eliminate it, and the concept of treatment failure (TF) or inadequate clinical response (ICR) remains debated.</p><h3>Aims</h3><p>The TAILOR study aims to assess the prevalence of ICR and TF in osteoporotic women undergoing active drug treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>TAILOR is a retrospective study conducted in an Italian outpatient service. We included 415 patients with at least 12 months of treatment and up to 10 years, examining clinical characteristics predicting TF and ICR. TF was defined as the occurrence of two fragility fractures while on treatment or one fracture plus lack of variation BMD and ICR as the occurrence of a new osteoporotic fracture in treated patients according to previous literature.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventy-two patients experienced fractures during the follow-up, of those, 26 (36%) were classified as TF. The clinical characteristics of patients with fractures were similar to those without, except for a longer postmenopausal period and lower lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD). Postmenopausal period was significantly longer in TF compared to ICR patients. However, no significant differences were found in baseline fractures, prescribed treatments, or fracture-free survival curves with age, postmenopausal period, BMD, and previous treatments. The clinical follow-up was longer in ICR and TF patients.</p><h3>Discussion</h3><p>TAILOR shows a higher prevalence of ICR and TF (17.3%) compared to randomized controlled trials and real-world data, with 36% of fractures during follow-up classified as TF. Clinician decisions often led to changes in antiosteoporosis treatment, particularly in TF cases, though TF diagnosis was rarely cited explicitly in medical records.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>TAILOR emphasizes that common clinical factors do not reliably predict ICR and TF. The findings highlight the complexity of determining an algorithm for the best treatment approach to prevent TF and ICR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-02972-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-02972-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Osteoporosis treatments reduce fracture risk but cannot fully eliminate it, and the concept of treatment failure (TF) or inadequate clinical response (ICR) remains debated.

Aims

The TAILOR study aims to assess the prevalence of ICR and TF in osteoporotic women undergoing active drug treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Methods

TAILOR is a retrospective study conducted in an Italian outpatient service. We included 415 patients with at least 12 months of treatment and up to 10 years, examining clinical characteristics predicting TF and ICR. TF was defined as the occurrence of two fragility fractures while on treatment or one fracture plus lack of variation BMD and ICR as the occurrence of a new osteoporotic fracture in treated patients according to previous literature.

Results

Seventy-two patients experienced fractures during the follow-up, of those, 26 (36%) were classified as TF. The clinical characteristics of patients with fractures were similar to those without, except for a longer postmenopausal period and lower lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD). Postmenopausal period was significantly longer in TF compared to ICR patients. However, no significant differences were found in baseline fractures, prescribed treatments, or fracture-free survival curves with age, postmenopausal period, BMD, and previous treatments. The clinical follow-up was longer in ICR and TF patients.

Discussion

TAILOR shows a higher prevalence of ICR and TF (17.3%) compared to randomized controlled trials and real-world data, with 36% of fractures during follow-up classified as TF. Clinician decisions often led to changes in antiosteoporosis treatment, particularly in TF cases, though TF diagnosis was rarely cited explicitly in medical records.

Conclusion

TAILOR emphasizes that common clinical factors do not reliably predict ICR and TF. The findings highlight the complexity of determining an algorithm for the best treatment approach to prevent TF and ICR.

骨质疏松症治疗失败:谁会再次发生骨折?TAILOR 一项回顾性研究
背景:骨质疏松症治疗降低了骨折风险,但不能完全消除它,治疗失败(TF)或临床反应不足(ICR)的概念仍存在争议。TAILOR研究旨在评估接受积极药物治疗的绝经后骨质疏松症女性中ICR和TF的发生率。方法stailor是一项在意大利门诊进行的回顾性研究。我们纳入了415例至少治疗12个月至10年的患者,检查预测TF和ICR的临床特征。以往文献将TF定义为治疗过程中出现两次脆性骨折,或治疗后出现一次骨折且骨密度和ICR均无变化为新发生骨质疏松性骨折。结果72例患者在随访中发生骨折,其中26例(36%)为TF。骨折患者的临床特征与无骨折患者相似,除了绝经后时间较长和腰椎骨密度(BMD)较低。与ICR患者相比,TF患者的绝经后时间明显更长。然而,基线骨折、处方治疗或无骨折生存曲线与年龄、绝经后时间、骨密度和既往治疗没有显著差异。ICR和TF患者的临床随访时间较长。与随机对照试验和真实数据相比,tailor显示ICR和TF的患病率更高(17.3%),随访期间36%的骨折被归类为TF。临床医生的决定经常导致抗骨质疏松治疗的改变,特别是在TF病例中,尽管TF诊断很少在医疗记录中被明确引用。结论临床常见因素不能可靠地预测ICR和TF。研究结果强调了确定预防TF和ICR的最佳治疗方法的算法的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信