Altered litter quality drives changes in litter decomposition following implementation of a regenerative measure in Dutch peat meadows

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sanne E. Bethe , James T. Weedon , Julia Marinissen , Matty P. Berg , Mariet M. Hefting
{"title":"Altered litter quality drives changes in litter decomposition following implementation of a regenerative measure in Dutch peat meadows","authors":"Sanne E. Bethe ,&nbsp;James T. Weedon ,&nbsp;Julia Marinissen ,&nbsp;Matty P. Berg ,&nbsp;Mariet M. Hefting","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The majority of NW European peatlands are degraded due to conventional grassland-based livestock farming (i.e. lowered groundwater levels, high nutrient inputs and high mowing frequencies) leading to increased CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and soil nutrient levels, and reduced biodiversity. Creating regenerative ditch borders along drainage ditches that surround agricultural fields could ameliorate some of these negative effects. We investigated the effects of ditch border type (conventional vs. regenerative) on litter decomposition (standardized litter using Tea Bag Index, and locally collected leaf and root litter), vegetation composition, litter quality, and soil characteristics along transects that extended from the water's edge into the adjoining field (40 cm, 80 cm, 360 cm and 640 cm) in a peat polder in North Holland, the Netherlands. The decomposition rate of standardized litter was unaffected by ditch border type, however the stabilization factor was 43% and 35% lower in regenerative ditch borders at 40 cm and 80 cm from the water's edge, respectively. Leaf litter collected from regenerative borders decomposed 75% slower than leaf litter from conventional borders. Regenerative soils were higher in organic matter content, carbon and nitrogen content, and soil moisture content, and lower in bulk density and soil compaction. This pattern was related with a lower decomposition rate and stabilization of standardized litter. Changes in litter decomposition are predominantly driven by a lower leaf litter quality produced at regenerative borders. Efforts to reduce carbon emissions should therefore focus on reducing decomposition rates by creating conditions that stimulate plant species producing litter of a lower quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"378 ","pages":"Article 124725"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725007017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The majority of NW European peatlands are degraded due to conventional grassland-based livestock farming (i.e. lowered groundwater levels, high nutrient inputs and high mowing frequencies) leading to increased CO2 emissions and soil nutrient levels, and reduced biodiversity. Creating regenerative ditch borders along drainage ditches that surround agricultural fields could ameliorate some of these negative effects. We investigated the effects of ditch border type (conventional vs. regenerative) on litter decomposition (standardized litter using Tea Bag Index, and locally collected leaf and root litter), vegetation composition, litter quality, and soil characteristics along transects that extended from the water's edge into the adjoining field (40 cm, 80 cm, 360 cm and 640 cm) in a peat polder in North Holland, the Netherlands. The decomposition rate of standardized litter was unaffected by ditch border type, however the stabilization factor was 43% and 35% lower in regenerative ditch borders at 40 cm and 80 cm from the water's edge, respectively. Leaf litter collected from regenerative borders decomposed 75% slower than leaf litter from conventional borders. Regenerative soils were higher in organic matter content, carbon and nitrogen content, and soil moisture content, and lower in bulk density and soil compaction. This pattern was related with a lower decomposition rate and stabilization of standardized litter. Changes in litter decomposition are predominantly driven by a lower leaf litter quality produced at regenerative borders. Efforts to reduce carbon emissions should therefore focus on reducing decomposition rates by creating conditions that stimulate plant species producing litter of a lower quality.

Abstract Image

由于传统的草地畜牧业(即地下水位降低、高养分输入和高修剪频率),西北欧的大部分泥炭地都已退化,导致二氧化碳排放量和土壤养分含量增加,生物多样性减少。沿着环绕农田的排水沟创建再生沟边可以改善其中的一些负面影响。我们在荷兰北荷兰的一个泥炭圩中,沿着从水边延伸到毗邻田地的横断面(40 厘米、80 厘米、360 厘米和 640 厘米),研究了沟边类型(传统型与再生型)对枯落物分解(使用茶袋指数的标准化枯落物,以及当地收集的叶和根枯落物)、植被组成、枯落物质量和土壤特性的影响。标准化枯落物的分解率不受沟边类型的影响,但在距水边 40 厘米和 80 厘米的再生沟边,稳定因子分别降低了 43% 和 35%。从再生畦收集的落叶的分解速度比从传统畦收集的落叶慢 75%。再生土壤的有机质含量、碳和氮含量以及土壤水分含量较高,而容重和土壤紧实度较低。这种模式与标准化落叶的分解率和稳定性较低有关。枯落物分解的变化主要是由再生边界产生的较低质量的枯落叶引起的。因此,减少碳排放的工作应侧重于通过创造条件,刺激产生较低质量枯落叶的植物物种来降低分解率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信