Development of an automated sorptive extraction system for trace analysis in water

IF 5.2 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Frank Jacobs , Dr. Klaus Kerpen , Dr. Eike Kleine-Benne , PD Dr. Ursula Telgheder
{"title":"Development of an automated sorptive extraction system for trace analysis in water","authors":"Frank Jacobs ,&nbsp;Dr. Klaus Kerpen ,&nbsp;Dr. Eike Kleine-Benne ,&nbsp;PD Dr. Ursula Telgheder","doi":"10.1016/j.sampre.2025.100156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) is an established microextraction technique developed in the early 2000s. It has gained widespread use in laboratories around the world, but always had one drawback in that it was a manual sample preparation technique. The newly developed system presented in this study aims to combine the well-known characteristics of SBSE with fully automated sample preparation. The presented system is based on a novel sample probe design, which uses the same dimensions and materials of sorbent phase as the commercially available Gerstel Twister® SBSE technology. To test the performance of this system, pesticides were extracted from pure water as well as river water. Limits of detection (4.5 ng/L to 53.6 ng/L) and quantification (15.7 ng/L to 327.6 ng/L) as well as standard method deviation (3.2 % to 37.6 %) were determined for 21 pesticides based on DIN EN ISO 27,108, part of the water framework directive (WFR). Standard addition was used to quantify pesticides in river water matrix. To check the performance of the new development, it was compared to established methods like manual SBSE, thin film micro extraction (TFME) and SPME-Arrow. The results are comparable between automated sorptive extraction (ASE) and SBSE (average of 84 % compared to automated system), as expected. Performance compared to TFME (65 %) and SPME-Arrow (3 %) was significantly better, especially to the latter. These results show that the automated sorptive extraction system developed in this paper is competitive with already established techniques.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100052,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Sample Preparation","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100156"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Sample Preparation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582025000099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) is an established microextraction technique developed in the early 2000s. It has gained widespread use in laboratories around the world, but always had one drawback in that it was a manual sample preparation technique. The newly developed system presented in this study aims to combine the well-known characteristics of SBSE with fully automated sample preparation. The presented system is based on a novel sample probe design, which uses the same dimensions and materials of sorbent phase as the commercially available Gerstel Twister® SBSE technology. To test the performance of this system, pesticides were extracted from pure water as well as river water. Limits of detection (4.5 ng/L to 53.6 ng/L) and quantification (15.7 ng/L to 327.6 ng/L) as well as standard method deviation (3.2 % to 37.6 %) were determined for 21 pesticides based on DIN EN ISO 27,108, part of the water framework directive (WFR). Standard addition was used to quantify pesticides in river water matrix. To check the performance of the new development, it was compared to established methods like manual SBSE, thin film micro extraction (TFME) and SPME-Arrow. The results are comparable between automated sorptive extraction (ASE) and SBSE (average of 84 % compared to automated system), as expected. Performance compared to TFME (65 %) and SPME-Arrow (3 %) was significantly better, especially to the latter. These results show that the automated sorptive extraction system developed in this paper is competitive with already established techniques.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信