Individual differences in anxious apprehension and anxious arousal alter resting-state network structure and connectivity

Q3 Psychology
Stacie L. Warren , Whitney N. Geller , Brian Droncheff , Kevin Liu
{"title":"Individual differences in anxious apprehension and anxious arousal alter resting-state network structure and connectivity","authors":"Stacie L. Warren ,&nbsp;Whitney N. Geller ,&nbsp;Brian Droncheff ,&nbsp;Kevin Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jadr.2025.100895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pathological anxiety is commonly treated as a unitary construct, manifesting as various clinical subtypes. However, there is a growing consensus that anxiety has at least two unique dimensions, anxious arousal and anxious apprehension. Nevertheless, their distinguishable neurobiological mechanisms are unclear. Here, we take a transdiagnostic approach to disentangle network-level functional and structural disturbances at rest, a state when some anxiety symptoms may be most apparent.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>53 adults experiencing a range of anxiety and/or depressive symptoms completed resting-state fMRI. Resting-state networks were identified by independent components analysis. Dual-regression tested anxious arousal and anxious apprehension derived within-network connectivity differences while controlling for depression. FSLNets tested differences in between-network functional connectivity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Anxious apprehension was associated with expansion of the default and somatomotor networks, while anxious arousal was associated with hyperconnectivity in the salience, limbic, frontoparietal, and default networks. Anxious apprehension was also associated with increased connectivity between the default and salience networks as well as decreased connectivity between the dorsal attention and limbic networks.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Evaluating a larger sample size and longer resting-state scans can better ensure reproducibility of results. The cross-sectional design limits conclusions about the temporal dynamics of anxious apprehension and anxious arousal and functional connectivity alterations observed in the present study.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Results suggest that anxious apprehension and anxious arousal have distinguishable neurobiological mechanisms that contribute to maladaptive differences in threat evaluation, stress response, and self-referential thought. These findings enhance our understanding of anxiety's nosology and pathophysiology, informing potential mechanisms for intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100895"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Affective Disorders Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915325000253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pathological anxiety is commonly treated as a unitary construct, manifesting as various clinical subtypes. However, there is a growing consensus that anxiety has at least two unique dimensions, anxious arousal and anxious apprehension. Nevertheless, their distinguishable neurobiological mechanisms are unclear. Here, we take a transdiagnostic approach to disentangle network-level functional and structural disturbances at rest, a state when some anxiety symptoms may be most apparent.

Methods

53 adults experiencing a range of anxiety and/or depressive symptoms completed resting-state fMRI. Resting-state networks were identified by independent components analysis. Dual-regression tested anxious arousal and anxious apprehension derived within-network connectivity differences while controlling for depression. FSLNets tested differences in between-network functional connectivity.

Results

Anxious apprehension was associated with expansion of the default and somatomotor networks, while anxious arousal was associated with hyperconnectivity in the salience, limbic, frontoparietal, and default networks. Anxious apprehension was also associated with increased connectivity between the default and salience networks as well as decreased connectivity between the dorsal attention and limbic networks.

Limitations

Evaluating a larger sample size and longer resting-state scans can better ensure reproducibility of results. The cross-sectional design limits conclusions about the temporal dynamics of anxious apprehension and anxious arousal and functional connectivity alterations observed in the present study.

Conclusions

Results suggest that anxious apprehension and anxious arousal have distinguishable neurobiological mechanisms that contribute to maladaptive differences in threat evaluation, stress response, and self-referential thought. These findings enhance our understanding of anxiety's nosology and pathophysiology, informing potential mechanisms for intervention.
焦虑不安和焦虑唤醒的个体差异会改变静息态网络结构和连通性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
134 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信