Associative learning in pairs tends to reduce individual differences in performance: An experiment with zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata)

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Noa Danthony, Esther M Lanaspa Pérez, Frédérique Dubois
{"title":"Associative learning in pairs tends to reduce individual differences in performance: An experiment with zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata)","authors":"Noa Danthony,&nbsp;Esther M Lanaspa Pérez,&nbsp;Frédérique Dubois","doi":"10.1016/j.beproc.2025.105170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The maintenance of individual differences in cognitive performance is puzzling given that cognitive performance is frequently correlated with fitness components. Cognitive performances are typically measured under laboratory conditions, in which individuals cannot observe others. Under natural conditions, however, observational learning would allow individuals with poorer cognitive abilities to improve their performance by copying the choices of more skilled individuals. Learning in groups would thus reduce differences in individual performance and, as such, might contribute to maintaining variability in cognitive abilities. Here, we carried out an experiment with zebra finches (<em>Taeniopygia guttata</em>) that were subjected to 3 associative learning tests, differing in terms of access to and complexity of public information. We found that the difference in learning performance between the fast and slow learners in the individual learning task was no longer significant when the slow learners had access to public information, but only if they received the same reward as their partner when choosing the same option. Thus, our study confirms that zebra finches tend to copy others’ decisions that perform better, and hence strongly suggests that individual variation in cognitive performance, when tested in isolation, may not accurately reflect actual foraging success in a natural social setting. In species that forage in groups and use social information, our findings thus might contribute to explaining i) the maintenance of individual differences in cognitive abilities, and ii) why cognitive performances are not necessarily used as mate choice criteria. To better understand the evolution of animal cognition, future studies will thus need to identify which are the relevant cognitive abilities on which selection may act and measure individuals’ cognitive performance in their natural environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8746,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Processes","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 105170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Processes","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635725000324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The maintenance of individual differences in cognitive performance is puzzling given that cognitive performance is frequently correlated with fitness components. Cognitive performances are typically measured under laboratory conditions, in which individuals cannot observe others. Under natural conditions, however, observational learning would allow individuals with poorer cognitive abilities to improve their performance by copying the choices of more skilled individuals. Learning in groups would thus reduce differences in individual performance and, as such, might contribute to maintaining variability in cognitive abilities. Here, we carried out an experiment with zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) that were subjected to 3 associative learning tests, differing in terms of access to and complexity of public information. We found that the difference in learning performance between the fast and slow learners in the individual learning task was no longer significant when the slow learners had access to public information, but only if they received the same reward as their partner when choosing the same option. Thus, our study confirms that zebra finches tend to copy others’ decisions that perform better, and hence strongly suggests that individual variation in cognitive performance, when tested in isolation, may not accurately reflect actual foraging success in a natural social setting. In species that forage in groups and use social information, our findings thus might contribute to explaining i) the maintenance of individual differences in cognitive abilities, and ii) why cognitive performances are not necessarily used as mate choice criteria. To better understand the evolution of animal cognition, future studies will thus need to identify which are the relevant cognitive abilities on which selection may act and measure individuals’ cognitive performance in their natural environment.
成对的联想学习倾向于减少个体表现差异:对斑胸草雀的实验
鉴于认知表现经常与健康成分相关,认知表现的个体差异的维持令人困惑。认知表现通常是在实验室条件下测量的,在实验室条件下,个体无法观察他人。然而,在自然条件下,观察学习将允许认知能力较差的个体通过模仿更熟练的个体的选择来提高他们的表现。因此,群体学习将减少个体表现的差异,因此,可能有助于保持认知能力的可变性。在这里,我们用斑胸草雀(Taeniopygia guttata)进行了一项实验,这些斑胸草雀接受了3项联想学习测试,这些测试在获取公共信息的途径和复杂性方面有所不同。我们发现,当慢学习者能够接触到公共信息时,在个体学习任务中,快学习者和慢学习者之间的学习表现差异不再显著,但只有当他们在选择相同的选项时获得与同伴相同的奖励时,这种差异才显著。因此,我们的研究证实,斑胸草雀倾向于模仿其他鸟类做出更好的决定,因此强烈表明,当单独测试时,认知表现的个体差异可能无法准确反映自然社会环境中实际的觅食成功。在群体觅食和利用社会信息的物种中,我们的发现可能有助于解释1)认知能力的个体差异的维持,以及2)为什么认知表现不一定被用作择偶标准。为了更好地理解动物认知的进化,未来的研究将需要确定哪些是与选择相关的认知能力,并测量个体在自然环境中的认知表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioural Processes
Behavioural Processes 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioural Processes is dedicated to the publication of high-quality original research on animal behaviour from any theoretical perspective. It welcomes contributions that consider animal behaviour from behavioural analytic, cognitive, ethological, ecological and evolutionary points of view. This list is not intended to be exhaustive, and papers that integrate theory and methodology across disciplines are particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信