Associative learning in pairs tends to reduce individual differences in performance: An experiment with zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata)

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Noa Danthony, Esther M Lanaspa Pérez, Frédérique Dubois
{"title":"Associative learning in pairs tends to reduce individual differences in performance: An experiment with zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata)","authors":"Noa Danthony,&nbsp;Esther M Lanaspa Pérez,&nbsp;Frédérique Dubois","doi":"10.1016/j.beproc.2025.105170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The maintenance of individual differences in cognitive performance is puzzling given that cognitive performance is frequently correlated with fitness components. Cognitive performances are typically measured under laboratory conditions, in which individuals cannot observe others. Under natural conditions, however, observational learning would allow individuals with poorer cognitive abilities to improve their performance by copying the choices of more skilled individuals. Learning in groups would thus reduce differences in individual performance and, as such, might contribute to maintaining variability in cognitive abilities. Here, we carried out an experiment with zebra finches (<em>Taeniopygia guttata</em>) that were subjected to 3 associative learning tests, differing in terms of access to and complexity of public information. We found that the difference in learning performance between the fast and slow learners in the individual learning task was no longer significant when the slow learners had access to public information, but only if they received the same reward as their partner when choosing the same option. Thus, our study confirms that zebra finches tend to copy others’ decisions that perform better, and hence strongly suggests that individual variation in cognitive performance, when tested in isolation, may not accurately reflect actual foraging success in a natural social setting. In species that forage in groups and use social information, our findings thus might contribute to explaining i) the maintenance of individual differences in cognitive abilities, and ii) why cognitive performances are not necessarily used as mate choice criteria. To better understand the evolution of animal cognition, future studies will thus need to identify which are the relevant cognitive abilities on which selection may act and measure individuals’ cognitive performance in their natural environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8746,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Processes","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 105170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Processes","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635725000324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The maintenance of individual differences in cognitive performance is puzzling given that cognitive performance is frequently correlated with fitness components. Cognitive performances are typically measured under laboratory conditions, in which individuals cannot observe others. Under natural conditions, however, observational learning would allow individuals with poorer cognitive abilities to improve their performance by copying the choices of more skilled individuals. Learning in groups would thus reduce differences in individual performance and, as such, might contribute to maintaining variability in cognitive abilities. Here, we carried out an experiment with zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) that were subjected to 3 associative learning tests, differing in terms of access to and complexity of public information. We found that the difference in learning performance between the fast and slow learners in the individual learning task was no longer significant when the slow learners had access to public information, but only if they received the same reward as their partner when choosing the same option. Thus, our study confirms that zebra finches tend to copy others’ decisions that perform better, and hence strongly suggests that individual variation in cognitive performance, when tested in isolation, may not accurately reflect actual foraging success in a natural social setting. In species that forage in groups and use social information, our findings thus might contribute to explaining i) the maintenance of individual differences in cognitive abilities, and ii) why cognitive performances are not necessarily used as mate choice criteria. To better understand the evolution of animal cognition, future studies will thus need to identify which are the relevant cognitive abilities on which selection may act and measure individuals’ cognitive performance in their natural environment.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioural Processes
Behavioural Processes 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioural Processes is dedicated to the publication of high-quality original research on animal behaviour from any theoretical perspective. It welcomes contributions that consider animal behaviour from behavioural analytic, cognitive, ethological, ecological and evolutionary points of view. This list is not intended to be exhaustive, and papers that integrate theory and methodology across disciplines are particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信