{"title":"Consistency-based diagnosis using data-driven residuals and limited training data","authors":"Arman Mohammadi, Mattias Krysander, Daniel Jung","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2025.106283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effective fault diagnosis is crucial for improving the durability and reliability of automotive systems. Developing a diagnostic system with desirable fault isolability requires an accurate model and/or representative training data covering all possible faults. One promising approach involves using physics-based neural network residuals, known as grey-box models. These networks, designed to represent the system’s nominal behavior and trained on fault-free data, are particularly advantageous when training data from faults are scarce. By incorporating causal relationships derived from physical insight, grey-box models retain the structural fault sensitivity of model-based residuals, enabling consistency-based diagnosis decision logic. However, despite their high accuracy in supervised learning benchmarks, neural networks often struggle with misclassification due to out of distribution data, a significant concern in diagnostic applications where false alarms are costly. This study highlights the importance of uncertainty quantification in neural network-based regression models and examines the interplay between different types of uncertainty in diagnostics. To address both epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties and achieve desirable fault isolation, the study applies adaptive thresholds and a measure for testing the validity of the residuals. Additionally, it proposes a consistency-based diagnosis framework using data-driven residuals, with its effectiveness demonstrated on an aftertreatment system of a heavy-duty truck under various drive cycles and fault scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50615,"journal":{"name":"Control Engineering Practice","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 106283"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066125000462","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Effective fault diagnosis is crucial for improving the durability and reliability of automotive systems. Developing a diagnostic system with desirable fault isolability requires an accurate model and/or representative training data covering all possible faults. One promising approach involves using physics-based neural network residuals, known as grey-box models. These networks, designed to represent the system’s nominal behavior and trained on fault-free data, are particularly advantageous when training data from faults are scarce. By incorporating causal relationships derived from physical insight, grey-box models retain the structural fault sensitivity of model-based residuals, enabling consistency-based diagnosis decision logic. However, despite their high accuracy in supervised learning benchmarks, neural networks often struggle with misclassification due to out of distribution data, a significant concern in diagnostic applications where false alarms are costly. This study highlights the importance of uncertainty quantification in neural network-based regression models and examines the interplay between different types of uncertainty in diagnostics. To address both epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties and achieve desirable fault isolation, the study applies adaptive thresholds and a measure for testing the validity of the residuals. Additionally, it proposes a consistency-based diagnosis framework using data-driven residuals, with its effectiveness demonstrated on an aftertreatment system of a heavy-duty truck under various drive cycles and fault scenarios.
期刊介绍:
Control Engineering Practice strives to meet the needs of industrial practitioners and industrially related academics and researchers. It publishes papers which illustrate the direct application of control theory and its supporting tools in all possible areas of automation. As a result, the journal only contains papers which can be considered to have made significant contributions to the application of advanced control techniques. It is normally expected that practical results should be included, but where simulation only studies are available, it is necessary to demonstrate that the simulation model is representative of a genuine application. Strictly theoretical papers will find a more appropriate home in Control Engineering Practice''s sister publication, Automatica. It is also expected that papers are innovative with respect to the state of the art and are sufficiently detailed for a reader to be able to duplicate the main results of the paper (supplementary material, including datasets, tables, code and any relevant interactive material can be made available and downloaded from the website). The benefits of the presented methods must be made very clear and the new techniques must be compared and contrasted with results obtained using existing methods. Moreover, a thorough analysis of failures that may happen in the design process and implementation can also be part of the paper.
The scope of Control Engineering Practice matches the activities of IFAC.
Papers demonstrating the contribution of automation and control in improving the performance, quality, productivity, sustainability, resource and energy efficiency, and the manageability of systems and processes for the benefit of mankind and are relevant to industrial practitioners are most welcome.