Analytical solutions for safety performance of bell-spigot jointed ductile iron pipelines under various normal fault-pipe crossing positions

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Qingshu Chen , Xiaogang Qin , Pengpeng Ni , Mingge Ye , Jianfeng Li
{"title":"Analytical solutions for safety performance of bell-spigot jointed ductile iron pipelines under various normal fault-pipe crossing positions","authors":"Qingshu Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaogang Qin ,&nbsp;Pengpeng Ni ,&nbsp;Mingge Ye ,&nbsp;Jianfeng Li","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2025.106507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Safety assessment of ductile iron (DI) pipelines under fault rupture is a crucial aspect for underground pipeline design. Previous studies delved into the response of DI pipelines to strike-slip faults, but all existing theoretical methods for DI pipelines under strike-slip faults are not suitable for normal fault conditions due to the difference in soil resistance distribution. In this study, analytical solutions considering asymmetric soil resistance and pipe deflection are developed to analyze the behavior of DI pipelines under normal faulting. Results indicate that DI pipelines with a longer segment length are more vulnerable to pipe bending damage, while exhibiting a lower sensitivity to joint rotation failure. For the conditions of pipe segment length <em>L</em> = 1.5 m at all burial depths and <em>L</em> = 3 m at a shallow burial depth, when the fault-pipe crossing position shifts from a joint to a quarter of the segment length (<em>rp</em> = 0 ∼ 0.25), DI pipelines are more prone to joint rotation failure. However, in the cases of <em>L</em> = 3 m at a moderate to deep burial depth and <em>L</em> = 6 m at all burial depths, the most unfavorable position is <em>rp</em> = 0.75, dominated by the mode of pipe bending failure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 106507"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825001452","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Safety assessment of ductile iron (DI) pipelines under fault rupture is a crucial aspect for underground pipeline design. Previous studies delved into the response of DI pipelines to strike-slip faults, but all existing theoretical methods for DI pipelines under strike-slip faults are not suitable for normal fault conditions due to the difference in soil resistance distribution. In this study, analytical solutions considering asymmetric soil resistance and pipe deflection are developed to analyze the behavior of DI pipelines under normal faulting. Results indicate that DI pipelines with a longer segment length are more vulnerable to pipe bending damage, while exhibiting a lower sensitivity to joint rotation failure. For the conditions of pipe segment length L = 1.5 m at all burial depths and L = 3 m at a shallow burial depth, when the fault-pipe crossing position shifts from a joint to a quarter of the segment length (rp = 0 ∼ 0.25), DI pipelines are more prone to joint rotation failure. However, in the cases of L = 3 m at a moderate to deep burial depth and L = 6 m at all burial depths, the most unfavorable position is rp = 0.75, dominated by the mode of pipe bending failure.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
454
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信