Artificial intelligence quantification and experienced reader computed tomography analysis for differentiating normal from minimally and mildly diseased coronary arteries: an early real-world compatibility study.
Amr Idris, Mahdi Hurreh, Thomas Knickelbine, João L Cavalcante, John R Lesser, Michael D Miedema, Jonathan Urbach, Marc C Newell, Melissa Aquino, Victor Y Cheng
{"title":"Artificial intelligence quantification and experienced reader computed tomography analysis for differentiating normal from minimally and mildly diseased coronary arteries: an early real-world compatibility study.","authors":"Amr Idris, Mahdi Hurreh, Thomas Knickelbine, João L Cavalcante, John R Lesser, Michael D Miedema, Jonathan Urbach, Marc C Newell, Melissa Aquino, Victor Y Cheng","doi":"10.1007/s10554-025-03366-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Differentiating normal from minimally and mildly diseased coronary arteries on coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) is crucial, impacting treatment decisions due to the extremely low coronary artery event risk associated with the former. Artificial intelligence quantitative computed tomographic (AI-QCT) can potentially identify subclinical atherosclerosis in cases deemed normal by reader interpretation. We aimed to evaluate AI-QCT's ability to distinguish reader-determined normal coronary arteries from those with minimal and mild diseased on CCTA. We screened 849 consecutive patients without coronary artery stents or bypass grafts who underwent CCTA and AI-QCT for suspected coronary artery disease between October 2022 and February 2023. Clinical reads were blinded to AI-QCT results. 411 patients (mean age 60, 63% women) with qualifying results were categorized into normal coronary arteries (NORMAL: calcium score of 0 and reader CAD-RADS 0), minimal (MINIMAL: coronary calcium score of ≤ 10, CAD-RADS score of 1, and 1 or 2 segments with plaque), and mild (MILD: coronary calcium score > 10 and < 100, CAD-RADS 1 or 2, and 1-3 segments with plaque) disease based on reader interpretation. AI-QCT results were compared among the categories and Youden index directed area-under-curve (AUC) analysis was employed to determine the optimal total plaque volume threshold distinguishing NORMAL from the other categories. Among the 411 patients, there were 235 NORMAL, 46 MINIMAL, and 130 MILD cases. AI-QCT detected no total plaque in 61/235 (26.0%) NORMAL cases. From NORMAL to MINIMAL to MILD, AI-QCT showed significant stepwise increases in total plaque volume (mean 7.7 mm<sup>3</sup> vs. 22.5 mm<sup>3</sup> vs. 40.5 mm<sup>3</sup>, p < 0.001 all pairwise comparisons) and noncalcified plaque volume (mean 6.7 mm<sup>3</sup> vs. 17.3 mm<sup>3</sup> vs. 24.4 mm<sup>3</sup>, p < 0.01 all pairwise comparisons). An AI-QCT total plaque volume of < 12.3 mm<sup>3</sup> identified 189/235 (80.4%) NORMAL cases and excluded 136/176 (77.3%) MINIMAL and MILD cases, with an AUC of 0.86. AI-QCT revealed significantly higher total plaque volume in reader-determined MINIMAL and MILD compared to NORMAL cases, showing promising concordance with reader interpretation. Our analysis suggests that an AI-QCT total plaque volume of < 12.3 mm<sup>3</sup> may serve as a useful initial cut-off for CCTA likely to be interpreted as normal by an experienced reader.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":"889-898"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-025-03366-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Differentiating normal from minimally and mildly diseased coronary arteries on coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) is crucial, impacting treatment decisions due to the extremely low coronary artery event risk associated with the former. Artificial intelligence quantitative computed tomographic (AI-QCT) can potentially identify subclinical atherosclerosis in cases deemed normal by reader interpretation. We aimed to evaluate AI-QCT's ability to distinguish reader-determined normal coronary arteries from those with minimal and mild diseased on CCTA. We screened 849 consecutive patients without coronary artery stents or bypass grafts who underwent CCTA and AI-QCT for suspected coronary artery disease between October 2022 and February 2023. Clinical reads were blinded to AI-QCT results. 411 patients (mean age 60, 63% women) with qualifying results were categorized into normal coronary arteries (NORMAL: calcium score of 0 and reader CAD-RADS 0), minimal (MINIMAL: coronary calcium score of ≤ 10, CAD-RADS score of 1, and 1 or 2 segments with plaque), and mild (MILD: coronary calcium score > 10 and < 100, CAD-RADS 1 or 2, and 1-3 segments with plaque) disease based on reader interpretation. AI-QCT results were compared among the categories and Youden index directed area-under-curve (AUC) analysis was employed to determine the optimal total plaque volume threshold distinguishing NORMAL from the other categories. Among the 411 patients, there were 235 NORMAL, 46 MINIMAL, and 130 MILD cases. AI-QCT detected no total plaque in 61/235 (26.0%) NORMAL cases. From NORMAL to MINIMAL to MILD, AI-QCT showed significant stepwise increases in total plaque volume (mean 7.7 mm3 vs. 22.5 mm3 vs. 40.5 mm3, p < 0.001 all pairwise comparisons) and noncalcified plaque volume (mean 6.7 mm3 vs. 17.3 mm3 vs. 24.4 mm3, p < 0.01 all pairwise comparisons). An AI-QCT total plaque volume of < 12.3 mm3 identified 189/235 (80.4%) NORMAL cases and excluded 136/176 (77.3%) MINIMAL and MILD cases, with an AUC of 0.86. AI-QCT revealed significantly higher total plaque volume in reader-determined MINIMAL and MILD compared to NORMAL cases, showing promising concordance with reader interpretation. Our analysis suggests that an AI-QCT total plaque volume of < 12.3 mm3 may serve as a useful initial cut-off for CCTA likely to be interpreted as normal by an experienced reader.
在冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(CCTA)上区分正常、轻度病变和轻度病变的冠状动脉是至关重要的,由于前者的冠状动脉事件风险极低,因此会影响治疗决策。人工智能定量计算机断层扫描(AI-QCT)可以潜在地识别亚临床动脉粥样硬化,在读者解释认为正常的情况下。我们的目的是评估AI-QCT区分读者确定的正常冠状动脉与CCTA上轻微病变的冠状动脉的能力。我们筛选了849名在2022年10月至2023年2月期间连续接受CCTA和AI-QCT检查疑似冠状动脉疾病的无冠状动脉支架或旁路移植患者。临床读数与AI-QCT结果不相关。411名患者(平均年龄60岁,63%的女性),合格的结果分为正常冠状动脉(正常:钙得分0和读者CAD-RADS 0),最小(最小:冠状动脉钙评分≤10日CAD-RADS得分1和1或2段斑块),和温和的(温和:冠状动脉钙评分> 10和3和22.5 mm3 mm3 vs 40.5, p 3和17.3 mm3 mm3 vs 24.4, p 3确定189/235(80.4%)正常情况下,排除136/176(77.3%)最小的和温和的情况下,AUC的0.86。AI-QCT显示,与正常病例相比,读取器确定的MINIMAL和MILD患者的总斑块体积明显更高,显示出与读取器解释的良好一致性。我们的分析表明,AI-QCT总斑块体积为3可以作为CCTA的一个有用的初始临界值,有经验的读者可能会认为这是正常的。