Initial Experience with the Pipeline Vantage Flow Diverter for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jonathan Cortese, Sherief Ghozy, Parya Valizadeh, Alireza Hasanzadeh, Melika Amoukhteh, Payam Jannatdoust, Amir Hassankhani, Ali Ahmadzade, Dan Adrian Popica, David F Kallmes, Ramanathan Kadirvel
{"title":"Initial Experience with the Pipeline Vantage Flow Diverter for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jonathan Cortese, Sherief Ghozy, Parya Valizadeh, Alireza Hasanzadeh, Melika Amoukhteh, Payam Jannatdoust, Amir Hassankhani, Ali Ahmadzade, Dan Adrian Popica, David F Kallmes, Ramanathan Kadirvel","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Pipeline Vantage Flow diverter (Vantage) is the latest generation of Pipeline flow diverters introducing Cobalt-chronium drawn-filled tubing and 48 to 68 wires.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We report the initial safety and efficacy of Vantage in treating intracranial aneurysms in the published literature.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to established protocols. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web-of-Science, and Embase databases up to December 2023. Original studies reporting treatment outcomes for intracranial aneurysms using Vantage in more than five patients were included.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Pooled data from 5 studies (373 patients, 418 aneurysms) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Outcomes of interest were: technical success, occlusion rates, complication outcomes and mortality.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>A technical success rate of 99.2% (95% CI: 98.29%-100%) was found. In unruptured cases, success rate was 378/383 (99.6%) versus 17/20 (85.0%) in ruptured cases (<i>P</i> < .01). Complete occlusion rate was 74.3% (95% CI: 67.43%-80.59%), with no significant difference between ruptured and unruptured cases (<i>P</i> = 0.72); median of follow up 6 months. Overall mortality rate was 1.2% (95% CI: 0.01%-3.64%), significantly higher in ruptured (18.6%; 95% CI: 5.13%-36.26%) versus unruptured cases (0.23%; 95% CI: 0%-1.36%) (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Hemorrhagic complications occurred at 1% (95% CI: 0%-3.36%) pooled rate. Thromboembolic complications were reported at 6.1% (95% CI: 2.60%-10.73%), decreasing to 4.35% (95% CI: 1.91%-7.54%) after excluding one outlier study.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Only five studies, some with small number of patients, were included in this meta-analysis which may limit the generalizability of our findings. The absence of long term follow-up also limits the assessment of treatment durability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this meta-analysis, we found that Vantage initial experience is similar to previous version of the Pipeline Embolization Device in terms of safety and efficacy for treatment of intracranial aneurysms, in particular unruptured aneurysms. Further prospective and comparative studies with patient outcome data specific to aneurysm location are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of Vantage.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"510-516"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Pipeline Vantage Flow diverter (Vantage) is the latest generation of Pipeline flow diverters introducing Cobalt-chronium drawn-filled tubing and 48 to 68 wires.

Purpose: We report the initial safety and efficacy of Vantage in treating intracranial aneurysms in the published literature.

Data sources: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to established protocols. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web-of-Science, and Embase databases up to December 2023. Original studies reporting treatment outcomes for intracranial aneurysms using Vantage in more than five patients were included.

Study selection: Pooled data from 5 studies (373 patients, 418 aneurysms) were analyzed.

Data analysis: Outcomes of interest were: technical success, occlusion rates, complication outcomes and mortality.

Data synthesis: A technical success rate of 99.2% (95% CI: 98.29%-100%) was found. In unruptured cases, success rate was 378/383 (99.6%) versus 17/20 (85.0%) in ruptured cases (P < .01). Complete occlusion rate was 74.3% (95% CI: 67.43%-80.59%), with no significant difference between ruptured and unruptured cases (P = 0.72); median of follow up 6 months. Overall mortality rate was 1.2% (95% CI: 0.01%-3.64%), significantly higher in ruptured (18.6%; 95% CI: 5.13%-36.26%) versus unruptured cases (0.23%; 95% CI: 0%-1.36%) (P < 0.01). Hemorrhagic complications occurred at 1% (95% CI: 0%-3.36%) pooled rate. Thromboembolic complications were reported at 6.1% (95% CI: 2.60%-10.73%), decreasing to 4.35% (95% CI: 1.91%-7.54%) after excluding one outlier study.

Limitations: Only five studies, some with small number of patients, were included in this meta-analysis which may limit the generalizability of our findings. The absence of long term follow-up also limits the assessment of treatment durability.

Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, we found that Vantage initial experience is similar to previous version of the Pipeline Embolization Device in terms of safety and efficacy for treatment of intracranial aneurysms, in particular unruptured aneurysms. Further prospective and comparative studies with patient outcome data specific to aneurysm location are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of Vantage.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信