ICDA-S-II index improves early-stage diagnosis of carious lesions among schoolchildren in northern Brazil.

Abstract

The Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth (DMFT) index is widely used for detecting carious lesions, primarily focusing on established cavities, while the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDA-S-II) is designed to identify incipient lesions.

Aim: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the diagnostic effectiveness of the DMFT index compared to the ICDA-S-II criteria designed for early-stage carious lesion diagnosis in schoolchildren from Belém (Brazil).

Materials and method: A cohort of 107 twelve-year-old schoolchildren from Belém (Brazil) underwent dental examinations by three calibrated examiners using the DMFT and ICDA-S-II indices. The ICDA-SII assessment involved prophylaxis, relative isolation, and a standardized drying period. Statistical analyses included ANOVA, chi-squared and G tests.

Results: No statistically significant differences were observed among examiners for either the DMFT (p = 0.699) or the ICDA-S-II (p = 1.000) indices. Gender did not influence results (DMFT: p = 0.697; ICDA-S-II: p = 0.310). Caries-free prevalence differed significantly, at 32% according to DMFT and 2.8% according to ICDA-S-II (p<0.001).

Conclusions: The DMFT index consistently underestimated carious lesions, whereas the ICDA-SII index enhanced the identification of incipient potentially reversible lesions. DMFT and ICDAS-II indices have demonstrated their efficacy in cavity detection, with the most significant distinction arising in ICDAS-II in the identification of early-stage carious lesions.