A Goal-Concordant Prescribing Conceptual Framework: Implications for Practice and Measurement.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Susan DeSanto-Madeya, Margaret F Clayton, Erik Fromme, Francesca Troiani, Jennifer Tjia
{"title":"A Goal-Concordant Prescribing Conceptual Framework: Implications for Practice and Measurement.","authors":"Susan DeSanto-Madeya, Margaret F Clayton, Erik Fromme, Francesca Troiani, Jennifer Tjia","doi":"10.1097/NJH.0000000000001112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Optimizing medication benefit and minimizing harm through effective and appropriate medication management is emerging as an important strategy in hospice and palliative care. This approach, however, often fails to align patient and family goals for remaining life with clinician priorities. Ascertaining patient and caregiver values and goals and aligning these goals with clinicians' priorities for care is a complex and iterative process. This process requires effective communication between all participants as a patient's illness trajectory moves toward death. The purpose of this article was to present a beginning conceptual framework for clinical consideration and use, as well as an example of a potential measurement framework envisioned from the conceptual framework for future research application. Both frameworks focus on goal-concordant prescribing among seriously ill older adults in home hospice. An environmental scan of existing deprescribing frameworks and approaches to goal ascertainment that inform hospice deprescribing was conducted. Feedback from practicing hospice clinicians engaged in a pilot project implementing a novel goal-concordant prescribing approach, as well as interprofessional clinicians and family caregivers from previous projects, were also used to identify theoretical and clinically relevant gaps in care as well as future research opportunities. The environmental scan and multiproject feedback served as the foundation for the development of the conceptual framework. The suggested communication frameworks for goal-concordant prescribing seek to bridge the gap between the preferences and priorities of the patient and family caregiver, and the risk-benefit considerations brought forth by clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":54807,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"149-155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0000000000001112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimizing medication benefit and minimizing harm through effective and appropriate medication management is emerging as an important strategy in hospice and palliative care. This approach, however, often fails to align patient and family goals for remaining life with clinician priorities. Ascertaining patient and caregiver values and goals and aligning these goals with clinicians' priorities for care is a complex and iterative process. This process requires effective communication between all participants as a patient's illness trajectory moves toward death. The purpose of this article was to present a beginning conceptual framework for clinical consideration and use, as well as an example of a potential measurement framework envisioned from the conceptual framework for future research application. Both frameworks focus on goal-concordant prescribing among seriously ill older adults in home hospice. An environmental scan of existing deprescribing frameworks and approaches to goal ascertainment that inform hospice deprescribing was conducted. Feedback from practicing hospice clinicians engaged in a pilot project implementing a novel goal-concordant prescribing approach, as well as interprofessional clinicians and family caregivers from previous projects, were also used to identify theoretical and clinically relevant gaps in care as well as future research opportunities. The environmental scan and multiproject feedback served as the foundation for the development of the conceptual framework. The suggested communication frameworks for goal-concordant prescribing seek to bridge the gap between the preferences and priorities of the patient and family caregiver, and the risk-benefit considerations brought forth by clinicians.

一个目标一致的处方概念框架:对实践和测量的启示。
通过有效和适当的药物管理来优化药物效益和最小化危害正在成为临终关怀和姑息治疗的重要策略。然而,这种方法往往不能使患者和家庭的剩余生命目标与临床医生的优先事项保持一致。确定患者和护理人员的价值观和目标,并使这些目标与临床医生的护理重点保持一致,是一个复杂而反复的过程。当病人的病情走向死亡时,这个过程需要所有参与者之间的有效沟通。本文的目的是为临床考虑和使用提供一个初步的概念框架,以及从概念框架中设想的用于未来研究应用的潜在测量框架的示例。这两个框架都关注家庭临终关怀中重症老年人的目标一致性处方。对现有的处方框架和目标确定的方法进行环境扫描,以告知临终关怀处方。参与一项试行计划的实务安宁疗护临床医师,以及先前计划的跨专业临床医师和家庭照护者的反馈,也被用来确定理论和临床相关的照护差距,以及未来的研究机会。环境扫描和多项目反馈是概念框架发展的基础。建议的沟通框架目标一致的处方寻求弥合病人和家庭照顾者的偏好和优先事项之间的差距,以及临床医生提出的风险-利益考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing (JHPN) is the official journal of the Hospice & Palliative Nurses Association and is the professional, peer-reviewed journal for nurses in hospice and palliative care settings. Focusing on the clinical, educational and research aspects of care, JHPN offers current and reliable information on end of life nursing. Feature articles in areas such as symptom management, ethics, and futility of care address holistic care across the continuum. Book and article reviews, clinical updates and case studies create a journal that meets the didactic and practical needs of the nurse caring for patients with serious illnesses in advanced stages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信