Prevalence and associations of kinesiophobia with patient-reported outcomes and mobility measures in axial spondyloarthritis.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
David Kiefer, Juergen Braun, Uta Kiltz, Niklas Kolle, Lucia Schneider, Ioana Andreica, Bjoern Buehring, Philipp Sewerin, Imke Redeker, Styliani Tsiami, Susanne Herbold, Xenofon Baraliakos
{"title":"Prevalence and associations of kinesiophobia with patient-reported outcomes and mobility measures in axial spondyloarthritis.","authors":"David Kiefer, Juergen Braun, Uta Kiltz, Niklas Kolle, Lucia Schneider, Ioana Andreica, Bjoern Buehring, Philipp Sewerin, Imke Redeker, Styliani Tsiami, Susanne Herbold, Xenofon Baraliakos","doi":"10.1016/j.jbspin.2025.105873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate prevalence and associations of kinesiophobia on patients with axSpA, and its relation to global functioning and health, disease activity, function, spinal mobility and physical activity in comparison to healthy controls (HC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional, observational study in which consecutive axSpA-patients with axSpA (n=100) and 20 healthy controls (HC) were examined by the Tampa scale of kinesiophobia (TSK), and the Fear avoidance belief questionnaire (FABQ). Patient reported outcomes and objective assessments of disease activity physical function, global health and functioning as well as the BASMI, the AS physical performance index (ASPI), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Epionics SPINE (ES) measurements, including range of motion (RoM) and kinematics (RoK) were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AxSpA-patients showed higher TSK (25.5±6.8 vs 14.0±5.1) and FABQ scores (40.1±22. vs 3.1±6.9) compared to HC, all p≤0.001. Categorical analyses of kinesio-phobia levels revealed that patients with higher levels performed significantly worse in ASPI and SPPB tasks, and they also showed impairments in BASMI and ES measures. TSK and FABQ scores correlated with ASAS HI (r=0.45 and r=0.52) and BASFI (r=0.38 and r=0.44), but not with ASPI, SPPB and RoK. Weak correlations were found for BASMI (r=0.24 and r=0.38) and BASDAI (both r=0.35).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Kinesiophobia seems to be a clinically relevant problem of axSpA-patients, since the mobility of patients with moderate to high TSK and FABQ scores was much more impaired in this study. Of interest, the level of kinesiophobia showed stronger correlations with physical function, global functioning and health than with mobility and PA.</p>","PeriodicalId":54902,"journal":{"name":"Joint Bone Spine","volume":" ","pages":"105873"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Bone Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2025.105873","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate prevalence and associations of kinesiophobia on patients with axSpA, and its relation to global functioning and health, disease activity, function, spinal mobility and physical activity in comparison to healthy controls (HC).

Methods: Cross-sectional, observational study in which consecutive axSpA-patients with axSpA (n=100) and 20 healthy controls (HC) were examined by the Tampa scale of kinesiophobia (TSK), and the Fear avoidance belief questionnaire (FABQ). Patient reported outcomes and objective assessments of disease activity physical function, global health and functioning as well as the BASMI, the AS physical performance index (ASPI), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Epionics SPINE (ES) measurements, including range of motion (RoM) and kinematics (RoK) were collected.

Results: AxSpA-patients showed higher TSK (25.5±6.8 vs 14.0±5.1) and FABQ scores (40.1±22. vs 3.1±6.9) compared to HC, all p≤0.001. Categorical analyses of kinesio-phobia levels revealed that patients with higher levels performed significantly worse in ASPI and SPPB tasks, and they also showed impairments in BASMI and ES measures. TSK and FABQ scores correlated with ASAS HI (r=0.45 and r=0.52) and BASFI (r=0.38 and r=0.44), but not with ASPI, SPPB and RoK. Weak correlations were found for BASMI (r=0.24 and r=0.38) and BASDAI (both r=0.35).

Conclusion: Kinesiophobia seems to be a clinically relevant problem of axSpA-patients, since the mobility of patients with moderate to high TSK and FABQ scores was much more impaired in this study. Of interest, the level of kinesiophobia showed stronger correlations with physical function, global functioning and health than with mobility and PA.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Joint Bone Spine
Joint Bone Spine 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.90%
发文量
184
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Bimonthly e-only international journal, Joint Bone Spine publishes in English original research articles and all the latest advances that deal with disorders affecting the joints, bones, and spine and, more generally, the entire field of rheumatology. All submitted manuscripts to the journal are subjected to rigorous peer review by international experts: under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision. (Surgical techniques and work focusing specifically on orthopedic surgery are not within the scope of the journal.)Joint Bone Spine is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey platforms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信