How to improve cardiovascular risk assessment in type 1 diabetes? The role of vascular age and arterial stiffness.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Dariusz Naskret, Michal Kulecki, Mikolaj Kaminski, Dominika Kasprzak, Pawel Lachowski, Justyna Flotynska, Iwona Anderko, Bartosz Lasowski, Dorota Zozulinska-Ziolkiewicz, Aleksandra Uruska
{"title":"How to improve cardiovascular risk assessment in type 1 diabetes? The role of vascular age and arterial stiffness.","authors":"Dariusz Naskret, Michal Kulecki, Mikolaj Kaminski, Dominika Kasprzak, Pawel Lachowski, Justyna Flotynska, Iwona Anderko, Bartosz Lasowski, Dorota Zozulinska-Ziolkiewicz, Aleksandra Uruska","doi":"10.20452/pamw.16956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Traditional cardiovascular risk (CVR) models may underestimate risk in this population, especially in high-risk countries. Vascular age (VA) and arterial stiffness (AS) are emerging as potential markers for improving CVR assessment.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigated the association between VA, AS, and the modified Steno Type 1 Risk Engine (ST1RE) score in adults with T1DM.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We included 109 T1DM adults, aged 18-50 years, with at least five years of disease duration. None had been diagnosed with cardiovascular disease or hypertension. VA was calculated using carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), while AS was assessed by 24-hour measurement of aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). We compared the standard ST1RE score, based on chronological age, with a modified ST1RE score based on VA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study participants had a median age of 32.4 (25.5-38.6) years and a diabetes duration of 14.0 (10.0-20.0) years. Using VA in the modified ST1RE score reclassified 32.1% of participants into a higher CVR category. The median CVR for the modified ST1RE was 9.68 (4.61-20.08)%, compared to 4.74 (3.24-8.12)% using the standard score. The modified ST1RE score was positively associated with PWV, OR 2.37 (95% CI: 1.46-3.84) p = 0.004, adjusting for sex, BMI, and at least one diabetic complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing VA and AS in clinical practice could enhance risk assessment in T1DM individuals, especially in high-risk populations. Further validation in larger cohorts is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":49680,"journal":{"name":"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej-Polish Archives of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej-Polish Archives of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.16956","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Traditional cardiovascular risk (CVR) models may underestimate risk in this population, especially in high-risk countries. Vascular age (VA) and arterial stiffness (AS) are emerging as potential markers for improving CVR assessment.

Objectives: This study investigated the association between VA, AS, and the modified Steno Type 1 Risk Engine (ST1RE) score in adults with T1DM.

Patients and methods: We included 109 T1DM adults, aged 18-50 years, with at least five years of disease duration. None had been diagnosed with cardiovascular disease or hypertension. VA was calculated using carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), while AS was assessed by 24-hour measurement of aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV). We compared the standard ST1RE score, based on chronological age, with a modified ST1RE score based on VA.

Results: Study participants had a median age of 32.4 (25.5-38.6) years and a diabetes duration of 14.0 (10.0-20.0) years. Using VA in the modified ST1RE score reclassified 32.1% of participants into a higher CVR category. The median CVR for the modified ST1RE was 9.68 (4.61-20.08)%, compared to 4.74 (3.24-8.12)% using the standard score. The modified ST1RE score was positively associated with PWV, OR 2.37 (95% CI: 1.46-3.84) p = 0.004, adjusting for sex, BMI, and at least one diabetic complication.

Conclusions: Implementing VA and AS in clinical practice could enhance risk assessment in T1DM individuals, especially in high-risk populations. Further validation in larger cohorts is necessary.

如何改进1型糖尿病心血管风险评估?血管年龄和动脉硬度的作用。
导读:心血管疾病是1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者死亡的主要原因。传统的心血管风险(CVR)模型可能低估了这一人群的风险,特别是在高风险国家。血管年龄(VA)和动脉硬度(AS)正在成为改善CVR评估的潜在指标。目的:本研究探讨成人T1DM患者VA、AS和改良Steno 1型风险引擎(ST1RE)评分之间的关系。患者和方法:我们纳入了109例T1DM成人,年龄18-50岁,病程至少5年。没有人被诊断出患有心血管疾病或高血压。通过颈动脉内膜-中膜厚度(cIMT)计算VA,通过24小时主动脉脉冲波速度(PWV)测量评估AS。我们比较了基于实足年龄的标准ST1RE评分与基于va的修改后的ST1RE评分。结果:研究参与者的中位年龄为32.4(25.5-38.6)岁,糖尿病病程为14.0(10.0-20.0)年。在修改后的ST1RE评分中使用VA将32.1%的参与者重新分类为更高的CVR类别。改良ST1RE的中位CVR为9.68(4.61-20.08)%,而使用标准评分的中位CVR为4.74(3.24-8.12)%。修正后的ST1RE评分与PWV呈正相关,经性别、BMI和至少一种糖尿病并发症校正后,OR为2.37 (95% CI: 1.46-3.84) p = 0.004。结论:在临床实践中实施VA和AS可以提高T1DM患者的风险评估,特别是在高危人群中。需要在更大的队列中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Polish Archives of Internal Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed periodical issued monthly in English as an official journal of the Polish Society of Internal Medicine. The journal is designed to publish articles related to all aspects of internal medicine, both clinical and basic science, provided they have practical implications. Polish Archives of Internal Medicine appears monthly in both print and online versions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信