{"title":"Effect of explicit literacy instruction on letter-sound correspondence acquisition for a child with cerebral palsy who uses AAC eye gaze.","authors":"Jessica G Caron, Nicole Ryan, Salena Babb, Christine Holyfield, Meghan O'Brien","doi":"10.1080/07434618.2025.2466166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This pilot study examines the effectiveness of an adapted literacy intervention focused on the acquisition of seven letter-sound correspondences (LSC) with a child with cerebral palsy who uses high-tech eye-gaze to communicate. A single case multiple probes across letter-sounds design was used. The independent variable was explicit instruction with materials that were adapted on the participant's AAC device. Instruction was provided by a trained graduate student. The dependent variable was the child's accuracy in identifying the correct letter from a high-tech eye-gaze grid of four letters, when provided with the letter-sound by the graduate student. Results indicated that the implementation of the literacy instruction by the graduate clinician was effective in teaching seven LSCs to the child with cerebral palsy who uses high-tech eye-gaze to communicate and participate in instruction. The participant demonstrated gains for all targeted LSCs and positive trends continued after the intervention was introduced through replications of each new LSC. Average gain scores ranged from +60% to +90%. Calculation of IRD was 1.0 across all LSCs, indicative of a very large effect. The student's gains in this pilot study indicate the promise of adapted literacy instruction for individuals with severe speech and motor impairments, who use alternative access to participate in literacy instruction. More literacy research is needed for learners who use AAC and alternative access methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":49234,"journal":{"name":"Augmentative and Alternative Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Augmentative and Alternative Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2025.2466166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This pilot study examines the effectiveness of an adapted literacy intervention focused on the acquisition of seven letter-sound correspondences (LSC) with a child with cerebral palsy who uses high-tech eye-gaze to communicate. A single case multiple probes across letter-sounds design was used. The independent variable was explicit instruction with materials that were adapted on the participant's AAC device. Instruction was provided by a trained graduate student. The dependent variable was the child's accuracy in identifying the correct letter from a high-tech eye-gaze grid of four letters, when provided with the letter-sound by the graduate student. Results indicated that the implementation of the literacy instruction by the graduate clinician was effective in teaching seven LSCs to the child with cerebral palsy who uses high-tech eye-gaze to communicate and participate in instruction. The participant demonstrated gains for all targeted LSCs and positive trends continued after the intervention was introduced through replications of each new LSC. Average gain scores ranged from +60% to +90%. Calculation of IRD was 1.0 across all LSCs, indicative of a very large effect. The student's gains in this pilot study indicate the promise of adapted literacy instruction for individuals with severe speech and motor impairments, who use alternative access to participate in literacy instruction. More literacy research is needed for learners who use AAC and alternative access methods.
期刊介绍:
As the official journal of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC), Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) publishes scientific articles related to the field of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) that report research concerning assessment, treatment, rehabilitation, and education of people who use or have the potential to use AAC systems; or that discuss theory, technology, and systems development relevant to AAC. The broad range of topic included in the Journal reflects the development of this field internationally. Manuscripts submitted to AAC should fall within one of the following categories, AND MUST COMPLY with associated page maximums listed on page 3 of the Manuscript Preparation Guide.
Research articles (full peer review), These manuscripts report the results of original empirical research, including studies using qualitative and quantitative methodologies, with both group and single-case experimental research designs (e.g, Binger et al., 2008; Petroi et al., 2014).
Technical, research, and intervention notes (full peer review): These are brief manuscripts that address methodological, statistical, technical, or clinical issues or innovations that are of relevance to the AAC community and are designed to bring the research community’s attention to areas that have been minimally or poorly researched in the past (e.g., research note: Thunberg et al., 2016; intervention notes: Laubscher et al., 2019).