Emotions are perceived differently from posed and spontaneous facial expressions.

IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Emotion Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1037/emo0001473
Yong-Qi Cong, Lidya Yurdum, Agneta Fischer, Disa Sauter
{"title":"Emotions are perceived differently from posed and spontaneous facial expressions.","authors":"Yong-Qi Cong, Lidya Yurdum, Agneta Fischer, Disa Sauter","doi":"10.1037/emo0001473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A widely used experimental paradigm in psychological research and clinical assessments involves identifying emotions from facial expressions, typically using posed expressions as stimuli. Perceptions of such stimuli are assumed to mirror those of naturally occurring emotional expressions. However, this assumption has been questioned because the perceptual equivalence of posed and spontaneous expressions has not been empirically established. To address this, we directly compared perceptual judgments of posed and spontaneous facial expressions produced by the same expressers in three preregistered studies. A total of 2,408 perceivers judged the emotions displayed in 1,244 dynamic facial expressions of eight emotions (anger, disgust, fear, sadness, joy, pride, compassion, and love). Consistent with our main hypothesis, emotions were much better recognized from posed compared to spontaneous expressions, by both Western (Study 1, <i>N</i> = 470) and non-Western perceivers (Study 2, <i>N</i> = 438). This pattern was replicated in a cross-cultural context in Study 3 (<i>N</i> = 1,500). Furthermore, in all three studies, we observed a \"negativity bias\" with only posed expressions. Specifically, negative emotions were better recognized than positive emotions from posed expressions, while the opposite was true for spontaneous expressions, such that positive emotions were better recognized than negative emotions. Our findings present clear evidence that perceptions of posed and spontaneous facial expressions meaningfully differ, and raise questions about the generalizability of findings from existing research that uses posed emotional expressions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1605-1621"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001473","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A widely used experimental paradigm in psychological research and clinical assessments involves identifying emotions from facial expressions, typically using posed expressions as stimuli. Perceptions of such stimuli are assumed to mirror those of naturally occurring emotional expressions. However, this assumption has been questioned because the perceptual equivalence of posed and spontaneous expressions has not been empirically established. To address this, we directly compared perceptual judgments of posed and spontaneous facial expressions produced by the same expressers in three preregistered studies. A total of 2,408 perceivers judged the emotions displayed in 1,244 dynamic facial expressions of eight emotions (anger, disgust, fear, sadness, joy, pride, compassion, and love). Consistent with our main hypothesis, emotions were much better recognized from posed compared to spontaneous expressions, by both Western (Study 1, N = 470) and non-Western perceivers (Study 2, N = 438). This pattern was replicated in a cross-cultural context in Study 3 (N = 1,500). Furthermore, in all three studies, we observed a "negativity bias" with only posed expressions. Specifically, negative emotions were better recognized than positive emotions from posed expressions, while the opposite was true for spontaneous expressions, such that positive emotions were better recognized than negative emotions. Our findings present clear evidence that perceptions of posed and spontaneous facial expressions meaningfully differ, and raise questions about the generalizability of findings from existing research that uses posed emotional expressions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

情绪的感知不同于摆姿势和自发的面部表情。
心理学研究和临床评估中广泛使用的实验范式涉及从面部表情中识别情绪,通常使用姿势表情作为刺激。对这种刺激的感知被认为反映了自然发生的情感表达。然而,这一假设受到了质疑,因为姿势和自发表达的感知等效性尚未得到实证证实。为了解决这个问题,我们在三个预先注册的研究中直接比较了同一表达者对摆姿势和自发面部表情的感知判断。共有2408名感知者对1244种动态面部表情中的8种情绪(愤怒、厌恶、恐惧、悲伤、喜悦、骄傲、同情和爱)进行判断。与我们的主要假设一致,西方(研究1,N = 470)和非西方感知者(研究2,N = 438)都能更好地识别来自摆姿势的情绪,而不是自发的表情。在研究3中,这种模式在跨文化背景下得到了重复(N = 1500)。此外,在所有三项研究中,我们都观察到只有摆姿势的表情才会产生“消极偏见”。具体来说,从摆姿势的表情中,消极情绪比积极情绪更容易被识别,而从自发的表情中,则相反,即积极情绪比消极情绪更容易被识别。我们的研究结果提供了明确的证据,表明对摆姿势和自然面部表情的感知有意义的不同,并对现有研究中使用摆姿势情绪表达的结果的普遍性提出了质疑。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emotion
Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
325
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Emotion publishes significant contributions to the study of emotion from a wide range of theoretical traditions and research domains. The journal includes articles that advance knowledge and theory about all aspects of emotional processes, including reports of substantial empirical studies, scholarly reviews, and major theoretical articles. Submissions from all domains of emotion research are encouraged, including studies focusing on cultural, social, temperament and personality, cognitive, developmental, health, or biological variables that affect or are affected by emotional functioning. Both laboratory and field studies are appropriate for the journal, as are neuroimaging studies of emotional processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信