A Missed Opportunity: Humanities in Anatomy Lab.

IF 1.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Emily Beckman, Chad E Childers, Jane Hartsock
{"title":"A Missed Opportunity: Humanities in Anatomy Lab.","authors":"Emily Beckman, Chad E Childers, Jane Hartsock","doi":"10.1007/s10912-025-09937-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A first-year medical student's first patient is already dead. For decades, the cadaver, or body donor, has been the human body on which students first examine, cut, identify, and discover. That the student forms a detachment from the body and the person who once occupied the body, however, initiates a pedagogical series of events that is difficult to undo at best and may be harmful at worst. This process reveals gaps in the anatomical instruction process that present a missed opportunity to educate future physicians in a way that not only maintains their humanity and capacity for empathy but also enhances it. The anatomy lab should be a place where early medical students converse about death and begin to confront their own feelings of discomfort and hesitation. Relying on a metaphor of disappearance, as articulated by Jewson, this paper reframes this problem and offers new ways of improving human anatomy instruction through a brief examination of the history of anatomy in general, the history of the actual human being (body donor) in particular, and the response of the student through humanities-based interventions and content. In what follows, we consider the existing gaps, the possible curricular options for enhanced education, and the potential benefits of incorporating a more robust humanities curriculum in the anatomy laboratory for first-year medical students.</p>","PeriodicalId":45518,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Humanities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-025-09937-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A first-year medical student's first patient is already dead. For decades, the cadaver, or body donor, has been the human body on which students first examine, cut, identify, and discover. That the student forms a detachment from the body and the person who once occupied the body, however, initiates a pedagogical series of events that is difficult to undo at best and may be harmful at worst. This process reveals gaps in the anatomical instruction process that present a missed opportunity to educate future physicians in a way that not only maintains their humanity and capacity for empathy but also enhances it. The anatomy lab should be a place where early medical students converse about death and begin to confront their own feelings of discomfort and hesitation. Relying on a metaphor of disappearance, as articulated by Jewson, this paper reframes this problem and offers new ways of improving human anatomy instruction through a brief examination of the history of anatomy in general, the history of the actual human being (body donor) in particular, and the response of the student through humanities-based interventions and content. In what follows, we consider the existing gaps, the possible curricular options for enhanced education, and the potential benefits of incorporating a more robust humanities curriculum in the anatomy laboratory for first-year medical students.

错失的机会:解剖学实验室的人文学科。
一年级医学生的第一个病人已经死了几十年来,尸体或遗体捐献者一直是学生们首先检查、切割、识别和发现的人体。然而,学生与身体和曾经占据身体的人形成了一种分离,这引发了一系列教学事件,这些事件往好了说很难撤销,往坏了说可能是有害的。这一过程揭示了解剖学教学过程中的漏洞,错失了教育未来医生的机会,这种教育方式不仅保持了他们的人性和移情能力,而且还增强了移情能力。解剖实验室应该是早期医科学生谈论死亡,并开始面对自己的不适和犹豫的地方。根据Jewson所阐述的消失的隐喻,本文重新定义了这个问题,并提供了改进人体解剖学教学的新方法,通过对解剖学历史的简要检查,特别是实际人类(身体捐赠者)的历史,以及学生通过基于人文学科的干预和内容的反应。在下文中,我们将考虑现有的差距,加强教育的可能课程选择,以及在医学一年级学生解剖实验室中纳入更强大的人文课程的潜在好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Humanities
Journal of Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Humanities publishes original papers that reflect its enlarged focus on interdisciplinary inquiry in medicine and medical education. Such inquiry can emerge in the following ways: (1) from the medical humanities, which includes literature, history, philosophy, and bioethics as well as those areas of the social and behavioral sciences that have strong humanistic traditions; (2) from cultural studies, a multidisciplinary activity involving the humanities; women''s, African-American, and other critical studies; media studies and popular culture; and sociology and anthropology, which can be used to examine medical institutions, practice and education with a special focus on relations of power; and (3) from pedagogical perspectives that elucidate what and how knowledge is made and valued in medicine, how that knowledge is expressed and transmitted, and the ideological basis of medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信